Microsoft Vista

[Dukem]

I have Vista loaded on a removable drive on my home PC so I can experiment with it and keep my original configured XPpro system as my everyday use OS.(That and my wife hates it when I change everything just when she gets used to it!) I have found out several things while testing Vista:
1. It doen't like to be in a multiple boot environment.
2. It is a resource hog
3. Make sure programs are compatable before loading - if possible
4. There are (too) many tweeks that can make it faster
5. I'll wait for about a year before I make it my standard OS (If at all!)

[MrCMYK]

well, vista's SP1 is out now. I am setting up a system and loading my aps. Takes a little bit getting used to, I am surprised to see soo much stuff still running on beta drivers... man, its been a stinking year! Oh well, I guess I should have known, we still don't have the Fiery drivers for all the current models either.

so far, my card reader is the only casualty for hardware. Software is weeding out the stuff I haven't used regularly

[techathens]

Stick With Xp Or Xp Pro Or Even 2000!

[fausto1981]

Yeap, Same here

sticking with XP Pro after experimenting for a minute.

[MrCMYK]

well, I have been playing w/ vista for a while now... I get several " windows, run.dll, outlook, explorer, windows update stopped working" error messages a day.

Me thinks its time to roll back to XP.

the "Vista Sucks" video is right, it just plane sucks.

Uncle Bill, you are on my VISTA list ;-)

[djbass]

I laugh when I read most of this because 99.9% of it is utter toss.

Vista is a very stable and well rounded OS. It is not buggy, still in beta, a resource hog or the spawn of satin.

My home system has been running it since release and it is been rock solid for the majority of that period. There were some performance/stability issues in the first couple of months but that wasn't Vista's fault, rather the driver vendors for still having beta drivers at Vista's launch.

It is true that it consumes more memory than XP does but for the most part that is a good thing as its part of the prefetching feature and improves the more you use your PC, it also dynamically allocates more memory to programs as needed.

I have about 8 months ago purchased a laptop preloaded with Vista for service work and have not encountered any compatibility problems for the most part.

Vista doesn't suck, its just different, and the sooner people learn its not just a prettier XP but a whole new OS the better.

[wingnut132]

I agree with djbass, I was beta testing it since the get go, have 3 new systems with vista and a couple of upgraded sytems from xp, all works fine with no issues never crashed and I did try when beta testing, vista is alot nicer than xp, just wait until windows 7 comes out people will still bitch. You have to move on and come out of the dark ages.

[MrCMYK]

I do like a lot of the features...

but after being on the computer for 20 min today...

when i logged in, I was greated with 2 "sidebar stopped ..." messages

I checked email (outlook 07 w/ all updates), went well.

I hit the link in copytechnet's email to take me to hear, IE7 crashed... stopped working msg.

then a "windows update stopped working" msg.

on the puter 20 minutes and had 4 errors. Oh yes, sometimes when I get one of these "xxx stopped working msgs, my taskbar and window frames turns white and my theme is changed, I must reset to my default to fix.

"Its not a bug, it's an undocumented feature" ;-)


my system is a homebuilt system. all the hardware is vista cert, w/ oem vista drivers. MS office 07 w/ all the updates, vista ultimate 32bit w/ SP1 and all the updates.

due to it being a new system and I have been testing / learning the only non MS software I have is quicken 06 w/ vista update.

I frequent the mom & pop computer markets/stores and most are having trouble w/ vista and xp outsells vista.

I have also been pokin' around on the vista PCs at the big stores... HP, Dell, Tosh ETC. it does seem like the big named PCs are running more reliably than the homebuilts... perhaps those people are the ones that are living large on vista

[djbass]

I have found stability problems to be driver related, certified or not it seems there must be some fundamental change to the driver structure that vendors are having trouble getting their heads around.

As an example I started out with Vista running on an Abit mobo and it never skipped a beat, as Abit generally are very good with their drivers.

I recently upgraded to a Asus mobo to get support for the newer 45nm processors and have had a couple of issues due to buggy drivers, every other bit of hardware is unchanged.

I would say that is the same reason the big named PC's run reliably as the out of box drivers have already been tested and tuned specifically for their hardware under Vista.

You have to remember XP has been around 7 years now and vendors have had plenty of time to get used to its quirks, it wasn't smooth sailing at release either. If you really want to wait another 7 years for Vista to reach the same equalibrium go right ahead but we will be staring down the barrel of Microsofts next OS by then

[Steve Perks]

I've been running Vista Ultimate for a few months now.
The install/fine tuning wasn't a painless exercise but soon got everything ironed out.

It has worked flawlessly ever since.
I was originally running with a P42.8ghz processor and 1GB RAM.
I've just built a new machine with a Core 2 dual 2.2ghz and 2gb RAM and Vista is now flying.

I'm one of the minority that loves it.