Thanks: 
Likes: 
Dislikes: Hi guys,
Just a quick and rather odd question. Does a larger toner generate a greater Q/m then a smaller toner assuming both toners are made up of the same "stuff"
Thanks in advance,
CG
Hi guys,
Just a quick and rather odd question. Does a larger toner generate a greater Q/m then a smaller toner assuming both toners are made up of the same "stuff"
Thanks in advance,
CG
Yes ... but not for the reason you think. When I first started out in the business 25 years ago the toner particle size was at least 3x larger than today's toner. Those analog machines needed proportionately more tribo-electric effect to hold the larger toner particles to the developer. Don't forget though that analog toner has the opposite charge as digital toner. =^..^=
If you'd like a serious answer to your request:
1) demonstrate that you've read the manual
2) demonstrate that you made some attempt to fix it.
3) if you're going to ask about jams include the jam code.
4) if you're going to ask about an error code include the error code.
5) You are the person onsite. Only you can make observations.
blackcat: Master Of The Obvious =^..^=
Originally Posted by blackcat4866
Im a little confused between analogue and digital printing, can you please elaborate?
Thanks
CG
Analogue copying uses scan photo conduction directly down to the drum via a set of mirrors. After primary charge a latent image forms/remains directly on the drum during the scan; ready to develope.
Digital copying uses photo conduction but replaces the last scan mirror with an analogue to digital CCD, which creates digital encoded data.
After primary charge on the drum the digital encoded data drives a laser beam which is then scanned across the drum to produce the latent image ready for development.
The above is a very simplified analogy.....
Inauguration to the "AI cancel-culture" fraternity 1997...
•••••• •••[§]• |N | € | o | M | Δ | t | π | ¡ | x | •[§]••• ••••••
Thanks, Neo. =^..^=
If you'd like a serious answer to your request:
1) demonstrate that you've read the manual
2) demonstrate that you made some attempt to fix it.
3) if you're going to ask about jams include the jam code.
4) if you're going to ask about an error code include the error code.
5) You are the person onsite. Only you can make observations.
blackcat: Master Of The Obvious =^..^=
Understood, thanks guys.
Out of curiosity, can you still get carrier with a large diameter (200µm)?
Thanks in advance CG
What are you building/constructing George ?
You seem to be interested in the finer details of photo static technology ?
You're not building a better toner-bomb are you?
There are members on this forum who can help you with that.....
Inauguration to the "AI cancel-culture" fraternity 1997...
•••••• •••[§]• |N | € | o | M | Δ | t | π | ¡ | x | •[§]••• ••••••
If you're hoping to reverse engineer a digital copier, I'm going to strongly advise against it. Copier companies often hire a team of guys who's sole responsibility is to design such equipment. Some are better ... some are worse, and all of them are exponentially better than anything I could come up with.
In the egotism of my youth I thought that I could improve on the manufacturer's designs, and I could definitely criticize them, but any improvements I could make would only be incremental in the broad scheme of things. =^..^=
If you'd like a serious answer to your request:
1) demonstrate that you've read the manual
2) demonstrate that you made some attempt to fix it.
3) if you're going to ask about jams include the jam code.
4) if you're going to ask about an error code include the error code.
5) You are the person onsite. Only you can make observations.
blackcat: Master Of The Obvious =^..^=
hi guys,
No toner bombs, and definitely not reverse engineering any copier/printer. I know they are highly specialised and the guys who are designing the copiers are all PhDs in Physics, something which i am not!.
I was, as my name suggests, curious
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks