Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Senior Tech 100+ Posts giddyupngo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    109
    Rep Power
    22

    Question Slow scanning to USB when large numbers of files on USB drive Kyocera 4501i

    Hello,
    A customer scans lots of documents to a USB drive, and puts it on the setting where each page becomes its own file. Here are the results.
    Scanned 32 pages double sided to a clean drive, after paper goes through, takes 12 seconds to store.
    Same 32 pages again on same drive, 2 minutes, 2 seconds to store.
    Same 32 pages again on same drive, 3 minutes, 40 seconds to store.

    As the number of files on the drive increases (after second run it had 128 files on it), the storing takes much longer. They have said it can take up to 15 minutes. I am using a 4GB drive, non partitioned. Has anyone run into this? Wondering if it would go quicker if each set of files went into a separate folder on the drive. If I delete the files on the drive from the Operation panel, it will do it in 12 seconds again.
    Thanks in advance.

  2. #2
    Senior Tech 250+ Posts
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    368
    Rep Power
    26

    Re: Slow scanning to USB when large numbers of files on USB drive Kyocera 4501i

    You could try with different drive and measure the results, but in general, it's not the optimal way for every day scanning of multiple sheets. Why don't you tell him that there are better, safer and faster ways of doing it through SMB/e-mail/FTP?

  3. #3
    Senior Tech 100+ Posts giddyupngo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    109
    Rep Power
    22

    Smile Re: Slow scanning to USB when large numbers of files on USB drive Kyocera 4501i

    Thanks Kyo Fan, however they want to scan this way. I did find a workaround. If you create separate folders on the USB drive, and scan each batch of files into a fresh folder, you always get the "clean drive" speeds. I scanned a 48 page document, split into 48 different Tiff files, and it took about 20 seconds to process after the pages went through. As long as I used a fresh folder for each batch, the speed stayed at 20 seconds. The MFP must slow down because it is referencing/indexing so many files.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Get the Android App
click or scan for the Copytechnet Mobile App

-= -= -= -= -=


IDrive Remote Backup

Lunarpages Internet Solutions

Advertise on Copytechnet

Your Link Here