What do you vote?
Why?
What do you vote?
Why?
Kyocera is a major brand...
Since I only work on Ricoh I don't feel qualified to pass an opinion.
However I feel that when the digital revolution came Ricoh did a lot better job turning their photocopiers into printers then the printer manufacturers did trying to get their printers to pretend they were photocopiers.
At least 50% of IT is a solution looking for a problem.
Hard to say. I'm doing 95% KonicaMinolta and they have lots of very good boxes but there are also some - mostly in the lower range - that are a shame for such a renowned brand with such a proud history.
Hans
" Sent from my Intel 80286 using MS-DOS 2.0 "
Jip the high volume and production machine from the blue burger is quite alright.
Real shame about the A4 platform.
Whatever
Agree.. The e series is really good despite the early electronic problems and clunky UI software. Any of the older stuff was pretty bad, but the Pro line stuff still has the older Konica built in. Take in case, The 951 is a decent machine despite being built on(but upgraded) a 15 year old platform(7085). The A4 stuff "might" get better now that they have bought into Lexmark.
Will add Kyocera is a decent alternative. I really like the older Falcon engines like 420i/520i. Super easy to work on with the newer TA interface.
see the thread below. I posted this exact question and the replies was lets say ummmm.
your most liked brand
Whatever
I'm not surprised Konica Minolta came out top, as an engineer they are the easiest to work on, all parts are complete units, no rebuilds, unlike Ricoh & Canon for example.
Let us eat, drink, and be merry, because tomorrow we may die!
For all your firmware & service manual needs please visit us at:
www.copierfirmware.co.uk - www.printerfirmware.co.uk
Bookmarks