Global Warming???

[gneebore]

You left out option D: Naturally occurring but accelerated / negatively affected by man.

Every climate science denier points to prior climate periods and says, "but there was an ice age" or "it was warmer last summer" which may be true in your area but man does affect climate change, it's pretty clear science. If you want to disagree with me you can but I don't care, I'll just stick with the opinion of 97% of the worlds scientists.

And here is where that 97 percent of scientist nonsense comes from:
"Lawrence Solomon, executive director of Energy Probe and author of The Deniers, carefully explains how dishonest researchers cooked the books:

“The number stems from a 2009 online survey of 10,257 earth scientists, conducted by two researchers at the University of Illinois,” he wrote in a 2010 article. “The survey results must have deeply disappointed the researchers – in the end, they chose to highlight the views of a subgroup of just 77 scientists, 75 of whom thought humans contributed to climate change. The ratio 75/77 produces the 97 percent figure that pundits now tout.”

Oh yes and here is something else to consider.

Why Humans Don't Have Much To Do With Climate Change

[copier addict]

And here is where that 97 percent of scientist nonsense comes from:
"Lawrence Solomon, executive director of Energy Probe and author of The Deniers, carefully explains how dishonest researchers cooked the books:

“The number stems from a 2009 online survey of 10,257 earth scientists, conducted by two researchers at the University of Illinois,” he wrote in a 2010 article. “The survey results must have deeply disappointed the researchers – in the end, they chose to highlight the views of a subgroup of just 77 scientists, 75 of whom thought humans contributed to climate change. The ratio 75/77 produces the 97 percent figure that pundits now tout.”

Oh yes and here is something else to consider.

Why Humans Don't Have Much To Do With Climate Change

Here is how NASA feels.

https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/

[ZOOTECH]

Here is how NASA feels.

https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/

It's already been suggested on another thread that you can't trust NASA info, because it's funded in part by the government - and the scientists just want more funding.

[copier addict]

It's already been suggested on another thread that you can't trust NASA info, because it's funded in part by the government - and the scientists just want more funding.

Yes I saw that. I laughed so hard milk came out my nose.

[gneebore]

It's already been suggested on another thread that you can't trust NASA info, because it's funded in part by the government - and the scientists just want more funding.

Actually having read several articles reporting and debunking the NASA faked data I tend to agree the report was not deliberately faking data. There is a study of the public data available that shows the data was manipulated.
NASA Exposed in 'Massive' New Climate Data Fraud | Principia Scientific International
Just a section of the above webpage below

Ewert painstakingly examined and tabulated the reams of archived data from 1153 stations that go back to 1881 – which NASA has publicly available – data that the UN IPCC uses to base its conclusion that man is heating the Earth’s atmosphere through the burning of fossil fuels. According to Ederer, what Professor Ewert found is “unbelievable”:
From the publicly available data, Ewert made an unbelievable discovery: Between the years 2010 and 2012 the data measured since 1881 were altered so that they showed a significant warming, especially after 1950. […] A comparison of the data from 2010 with the data of 2012 shows that NASA-GISS had altered its own datasets so that especially after WWII a clear warming appears – although it never existed.”

[ZOOTECH]

From the brief overview of PSI, I will reply at a later time; but it does seem to be a respected site - I will dig deeper to see who is behind ( money wise ) this blog.

[Phil B.]

Yes I saw that. I laughed so hard milk came out my nose.

hopefully you were drinking milk at the time!

[skynet]

Scientists have found the problem.

[copiertec]

Here is how NASA feels.

Scientific Consensus | Facts – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet

Is this the same organization that makes it sound and look like we have actually landed on the moon and have explored other planetary objects in outer space?

[Phil B.]

Is this the same organization that makes it sound and look like we have actually landed on the moon and have explored other planetary objects in outer space?

so you feel we didn't land on the moon.. or haven't explored deep space.?


bet you think the world is flat also.