Page 63 of 130 FirstFirst ... 13535455565758596061626364656667686970717273113 ... LastLast
Results 621 to 630 of 1299
  1. #621
    Aging Tech 10,000+ Posts
    How Russia hacked the Democrats email

    copier addict's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Diamond
    Posts
    11,981
    Rep Power
    324

    Re: How Russia hacked the Democrats email

    Quote Originally Posted by bsm2 View Post
    No matter how many facts get posted the sheep will never admit their messiah has done anything wrong

  2. #622
    Service Manager 1,000+ Posts theengel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    North Bend
    Posts
    1,780
    Rep Power
    51

    Re: How Russia hacked the Democrats email

    Quote Originally Posted by fixthecopier View Post
    You can't indict yourself if you are not guilty of anything.
    That's not true. Police and FBI constantly trap people with process crimes... which is exactly what happened to Flynn. Law enforcement is every bit as corrupt as criminal empires this way. Their only goal is to convict--not to solve crimes. Many times, they create crimes to get convictions.

    BREAKING: Did Robert Mueller conspire to keep four innocent men framed by the FBI in prison for life for a murder they did not commit? The Boston Globe and a longtime member of the MA Parole Board say YES. – Howie Carr Show

  3. #623
    Aging Tech 10,000+ Posts
    How Russia hacked the Democrats email

    copier addict's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Diamond
    Posts
    11,981
    Rep Power
    324

    Re: How Russia hacked the Democrats email

    Quote Originally Posted by Phil B. View Post
    if you are AT ALL familiar with COURT PROCEEDINGS, during an ON GOING INVESTIGATION, it can be criminal to release facts/comments about the case.

    and as far as the FIFTH ... ANYONE AT ANYTIME can plead the fifth! That's WHY there IS a fifth amendment to the Constitution, so that we can make sure we don't indict ourselves.
    I think the word you are looking for is "incriminate " not "indict".

  4. #624
    IT Manager 10,000+ Posts bsm2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Biden 2024
    Posts
    25,971
    Rep Power
    335

    Re: How Russia hacked the Democrats email

    Quote Originally Posted by theengel View Post
    That's not true. Police and FBI constantly trap people with process crimes... which is exactly what happened to Flynn. Law enforcement is every bit as corrupt as criminal empires this way. Their only goal is to convict--not to solve crimes. Many times, they create crimes to get convictions.

    BREAKING: Did Robert Mueller conspire to keep four innocent men framed by the FBI in prison for life for a murder they did not commit? The Boston Globe and a longtime member of the MA Parole Board say YES. – Howie Carr Show

    Flynn a BUM Plead Guilty we don't even know what he said to the RUSSIAN"S because it's classified
    DUPED AGAIN!

    Here it comes wait for , wait for it Blame OBAMA
    Last edited by bsm2; 05-13-2018 at 07:46 PM.

  5. #625
    Not a service manager 2,500+ Posts Iowatech's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    3,933
    Rep Power
    97

    Re: How Russia hacked the Democrats email

    Quote Originally Posted by bsm2 View Post
    Flynn a BUM Plead Guilty we don't even know what he said to the RUSSIAN"S because it's classified
    DUPED AGAIN!

    Here it comes wait for , wait for it Blame OBAMA
    But the judge is holding up the case because of lack of information from the prosecutors.
    Nothing personally to do with President Obama.
    You share unusable overly dramatic fluff. Try harder not to do that. We might get somewhere then.

  6. #626
    IT Manager 10,000+ Posts bsm2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Biden 2024
    Posts
    25,971
    Rep Power
    335

    Re: How Russia hacked the Democrats email

    Editorial: The Trump-Russia connection gets harder to ignore

    Since before his inauguration, President Donald Trump has been relentlessly tweeting, often in capital letters, that there was NO COLLUSION between his campaign and Russian agents. True, no outright fire has yet been disclosed, but there’s an awful lot of smoke. Last week it got thicker.


    On Tuesday it was disclosed that a firm tied to Viktor Vekselberg, whose fortune of $13 billion makes him one of the richest men in Russia, paid some $500,000 in 2017 to Essential Consultants LLC, a shell company formed by Trump’s New York lawyer, Michael Cohen. Because Essential Consultants was the vehicle Trump used to pay hush money to porn star Stormy Daniels in the weeks before the 2016 election, there’s now linkage between Russian influence and a scandal that once threatened to wreck Trump’s candidacy.


    These ingredients have come back to threaten Trump’s presidency as details of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation indicate overlapping signs of collusion, potentially illegal campaign finance deals and backdoor influence peddling. American voters have been hoodwinked by a man who promised to drain the Washington swamp but instead wound up filling it to the brim.


    In addition to the Cohen scandal, there’s more smoke emanating from a recent Washington Post story about a $400 million buying spree by the Trump Organization between 2006 and 2014. Trump defied his own practice of leveraging purchases with lots of debt, paying cash for high-end real estate with money his sons, in the years before Trump’s presidential bid, seemingly acknowledged came from Russia.


    “Russia has never tried to use leverage over me,” Trump tweeted days before his inauguration. “I HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH RUSSIA—NO DEALS, NO LOANS, NO NOTHING.”


    Perhaps in present tense that was true. But Trump did lots of real estate deals with Russians before running for president. Had he made his tax returns public, voters would have known where his money came from — and properly informed voters might have changed the election’s outcome.


    Privately held corporations like the Trump Organization do business through a web of limited liability corporations. Their public disclosure rules are minimal. But Special Counsel Robert Mueller can obtain tax records. If the investment source of Trump’s $400 million spending spree was Russian, it will be explosive.


    Defying his own boast of being the “King of Debt,” Trump began the spree in 2006. He bought golf courses and expensive real estate in Scotland, Ireland, Beverly Hills and on the East Coast. His property upgrades alone cost $164 million.


    A Trump casino-hotel bankruptcy in Atlantic City endangered his domestic credit. He went abroad to borrow $295 million from Deutsche Bank for projects in Miami and Washington. He sued another division of the same bank to refinance a $40 million personal debt he owed in Chicago, arguing that the real estate crash was, in effect, an “act of God.”


    U.S. and United Kingdom financial regulators have fined Deutsche Bank $630 million for laundering money for Russian oligarchs. Mueller has subpoenaed Deutsche Bank’s records of its dealings with Trump associates.


    In 2008, Donald Jr. told a real estate conference in New York, “Russians make up a pretty disproportionate cross-section of a lot of our assets. … We see a lot of money pouring in from Russia.”


    Five years later, his younger brother, Eric, reportedly responded when a golf journalist asked how the Trumps were financing golf courses when the industry was stagnating, “Well, we don’t rely on American banks. We have all the funding we need out of Russia.” Eric Trump now claims that his father had “incredible cash flow and built incredible wealth. He didn’t need to think about borrowing for every transaction. We invested in ourselves.”


    The president and his sons change their stories to suit circumstances. That was the case when the president last month denied making hush money payments to the porn star. He said it had been Michael Cohen’s doing.


    In a Fox News interview this month, his new attorney, Rudy Giuliani, blurted a different account. Afterward, Trump said he’d been paying Cohen a $35,000 a month retainer, and the hush money might have been paid from that.


    It turns out he wasn’t the only one paying retainers to Cohen. The 51-year-old lawyer, a former executive vice president of The Trump Organization, leveraged his influence with the president in 2017 to obtain $1.2 million from the drug company Novartis and $600,000 from AT&T.


    Pharmaceutical companies have extensive dealings with the federal government. AT&T wanted Justice Department approval for its $85 billion merger with Time Warner as well as a change to the FCC’s “net neutrality” rules. The company said it was paying Cohen, who has zero experience in telecom law, for his “insights.”


    Influence peddling is not necessarily against the law; indeed, it’s a way of life in the Washington swamp. But it is illegal for foreign citizens and companies to try to influence U.S. elections, making the Vekselberg connection particularly problematic.


    Cohen has long had family and business ties to shady Russian businessmen, including some with alleged ties to organized crime. This same man served as Trump’s fixer, the man who paid off his girlfriends. It could be the stuff of a cheesy political thriller. Instead, it is the scandalous reality engulfing the president of the United States.

  7. #627
    Not a service manager 2,500+ Posts Iowatech's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    3,933
    Rep Power
    97

    Re: How Russia hacked the Democrats email

    Quote Originally Posted by bsm2 View Post
    Editorial: The Trump-Russia connection gets harder to ignore

    Since before his inauguration, President Donald Trump has been relentlessly tweeting, often in capital letters, that there was NO COLLUSION between his campaign and Russian agents. True, no outright fire has yet been disclosed, but there’s an awful lot of smoke. Last week it got thicker.


    On Tuesday it was disclosed that a firm tied to Viktor Vekselberg, whose fortune of $13 billion makes him one of the richest men in Russia, paid some $500,000 in 2017 to Essential Consultants LLC, a shell company formed by Trump’s New York lawyer, Michael Cohen. Because Essential Consultants was the vehicle Trump used to pay hush money to porn star Stormy Daniels in the weeks before the 2016 election, there’s now linkage between Russian influence and a scandal that once threatened to wreck Trump’s candidacy.


    These ingredients have come back to threaten Trump’s presidency as details of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation indicate overlapping signs of collusion, potentially illegal campaign finance deals and backdoor influence peddling. American voters have been hoodwinked by a man who promised to drain the Washington swamp but instead wound up filling it to the brim.


    In addition to the Cohen scandal, there’s more smoke emanating from a recent Washington Post story about a $400 million buying spree by the Trump Organization between 2006 and 2014. Trump defied his own practice of leveraging purchases with lots of debt, paying cash for high-end real estate with money his sons, in the years before Trump’s presidential bid, seemingly acknowledged came from Russia.


    “Russia has never tried to use leverage over me,” Trump tweeted days before his inauguration. “I HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH RUSSIA—NO DEALS, NO LOANS, NO NOTHING.”


    Perhaps in present tense that was true. But Trump did lots of real estate deals with Russians before running for president. Had he made his tax returns public, voters would have known where his money came from — and properly informed voters might have changed the election’s outcome.


    Privately held corporations like the Trump Organization do business through a web of limited liability corporations. Their public disclosure rules are minimal. But Special Counsel Robert Mueller can obtain tax records. If the investment source of Trump’s $400 million spending spree was Russian, it will be explosive.


    Defying his own boast of being the “King of Debt,” Trump began the spree in 2006. He bought golf courses and expensive real estate in Scotland, Ireland, Beverly Hills and on the East Coast. His property upgrades alone cost $164 million.


    A Trump casino-hotel bankruptcy in Atlantic City endangered his domestic credit. He went abroad to borrow $295 million from Deutsche Bank for projects in Miami and Washington. He sued another division of the same bank to refinance a $40 million personal debt he owed in Chicago, arguing that the real estate crash was, in effect, an “act of God.”


    U.S. and United Kingdom financial regulators have fined Deutsche Bank $630 million for laundering money for Russian oligarchs. Mueller has subpoenaed Deutsche Bank’s records of its dealings with Trump associates.


    In 2008, Donald Jr. told a real estate conference in New York, “Russians make up a pretty disproportionate cross-section of a lot of our assets. … We see a lot of money pouring in from Russia.”


    Five years later, his younger brother, Eric, reportedly responded when a golf journalist asked how the Trumps were financing golf courses when the industry was stagnating, “Well, we don’t rely on American banks. We have all the funding we need out of Russia.” Eric Trump now claims that his father had “incredible cash flow and built incredible wealth. He didn’t need to think about borrowing for every transaction. We invested in ourselves.”


    The president and his sons change their stories to suit circumstances. That was the case when the president last month denied making hush money payments to the porn star. He said it had been Michael Cohen’s doing.


    In a Fox News interview this month, his new attorney, Rudy Giuliani, blurted a different account. Afterward, Trump said he’d been paying Cohen a $35,000 a month retainer, and the hush money might have been paid from that.


    It turns out he wasn’t the only one paying retainers to Cohen. The 51-year-old lawyer, a former executive vice president of The Trump Organization, leveraged his influence with the president in 2017 to obtain $1.2 million from the drug company Novartis and $600,000 from AT&T.


    Pharmaceutical companies have extensive dealings with the federal government. AT&T wanted Justice Department approval for its $85 billion merger with Time Warner as well as a change to the FCC’s “net neutrality” rules. The company said it was paying Cohen, who has zero experience in telecom law, for his “insights.”


    Influence peddling is not necessarily against the law; indeed, it’s a way of life in the Washington swamp. But it is illegal for foreign citizens and companies to try to influence U.S. elections, making the Vekselberg connection particularly problematic.


    Cohen has long had family and business ties to shady Russian businessmen, including some with alleged ties to organized crime. This same man served as Trump’s fixer, the man who paid off his girlfriends. It could be the stuff of a cheesy political thriller. Instead, it is the scandalous reality engulfing the president of the United States.
    So?

  8. #628
    Aging Tech 10,000+ Posts
    How Russia hacked the Democrats email

    copier addict's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Diamond
    Posts
    11,981
    Rep Power
    324

    Re: How Russia hacked the Democrats email

    Quote Originally Posted by Iowatech View Post
    So?
    Information.

  9. #629
    IT Manager 10,000+ Posts bsm2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Biden 2024
    Posts
    25,971
    Rep Power
    335

    Re: How Russia hacked the Democrats email

    Quote Originally Posted by Iowatech View Post
    So?

    Ok I'll play So What?

  10. #630
    IT Manager 10,000+ Posts bsm2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Biden 2024
    Posts
    25,971
    Rep Power
    335

    Re: How Russia hacked the Democrats email

    Cambridge Analytica Being Investigated By Justice Department, FBI: Report
    News of the investigation comes two months after the company was accused of harvesting 87 million Facebook users’ personal data.

    The FBI and the Department of Justice are investigating Cambridge Analytica, the now-defunct data firm involved in a massive data breach in March, The New York Times reported Tuesday.


    News of the investigation comes roughly two months after the London-based company was accused of secretly harvesting the personal data of at least 87 million Facebook users to better identify individuals that could be targeted and influenced by specific marketing material.


    Federal investigators have reportedly questioned potential witnesses, including former employees and banks that conducted business with the company, a U.S. official and other people familiar with the probe told the Times.


    The DOJ declined to comment, while the FBI did not immediately respond to a query.


    The United Kingdom’s National Crime Agency is conducting its own investigation into whether the firm violated the country’s Data Protection Act, the Times reported. The agency is looking into allegations that Cambridge Analytica employees may have sought to bribe foreign officials, tampered with evidence and hacked computers.

    Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign hired Cambridge Analytica
    but the company has denied that it used data acquired through Facebook to assist Trump’s efforts to win the election.



    Secret recordings of Cambridge Analytica executives appeared to capture them bragging about helping elect Trump by using “unattributable and untraceable” advertising and attack ads, according to an undercover report by British news station Channel 4.



    Cambridge Analytica Being Investigated By Justice Department, FBI: Report | HuffPost

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Get the Android App
click or scan for the Copytechnet Mobile App

-= -= -= -= -=


IDrive Remote Backup

Lunarpages Internet Solutions

Advertise on Copytechnet

Your Link Here