Thanks: 
Likes: Here is the kyocera part#302LV93133 FK-3130 I dont know the ricoh cost on these but I am sure the kyocera one is cheaper if they didnt modify it.
Dislikes: 0
Here is the kyocera part#302LV93133 FK-3130 I dont know the ricoh cost on these but I am sure the kyocera one is cheaper if they didnt modify it.
fuser ricoh.JPGfuser kyo.JPGOriginally Posted by mita
It is cheaper option indeed!
Thanks everyone!
Sent from Ericsson DBH 1001.
But, are they interchangable?
Don't have any Kyoceras of that type - in field to check that theory, can only make some pictures and compare to some other pictures... Usually all Kyocera stuff has 302....... and FK-.... in their part catalogs. To me it looks like Kyocera made another production line just for Ricoh and within that line Kyocera just continued to assemble units just with another labels and gave them 302SB93070, FK-3160(U) to not come across 302LV93133 FK-3130 respectively.
photo_2019-06-26_21-59-24.jpgphoto_2019-06-26_22-52-08.jpgphoto_2019-06-26_22-52-04.jpg
The way stickers looks - it's pure Kyocera. Frame should be same, thermistor's Ohm resistance - pretty sure value is equal between units. Anyways, it's just a theory...
Thanks!
Sent from Ericsson DBH 1001.
Often what is different is an alignment pin or slightly moving the position of a connector.
If you play football with the printer... Yes, and u get a SC204 in the front door.
The maintenance kits and AIO cartridge is a kick in the mouth for techs. U don't need techs to change that, and, if the user has to change that, a HP M602 was a much better printer.
First fuser changed in a Sp5300, 450k, was working ok but it makes noise. This is near to perfect, did 450k only with toner.
The only fault i see in the mp501 is the ardf. An spdf would be much better.
Enviado desde mi Redmi 4X mediante Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks