Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19
  1. #11
    Senior Tech 250+ Posts Voltage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    George
    Posts
    282
    Rep Power
    34
    I have a SP8200 which i think are the same as the MP4000 without the scanner. Mine has got 750k on a.t.m. I have only been there 5 times. 4 of them PM's. Work 100% better than the 8100 they had before

  2. #12
    Senior Technician 250+ Posts stephend's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    309
    Rep Power
    34

    Exclamation

    I'm consequent and stick with the same idea since the first problems with 4-5000 started.
    It all depends on how the users use and abuse these poor machines....
    I have plenty of 4/5000 with the genuine (first release) dev units + old type toner that are performing well....but the customers are at 10K/month with a decent page coverage (where they should be all)
    and
    I have plenty of 5000's with all the mods done: new dev unit + new toner and still after 40K the quality is crap, black is faded and dev is weak but they are running over 30K a month...
    So who's with me on this one???

  3. #13
    Service Manager 1,000+ Posts
    MP4/5000 updte/feedback

    Shadow1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    M'ssippi
    Posts
    1,643
    Rep Power
    55
    I've had Lanier 5645's run 80k a month with no problems, so no I'm not with you - Ricoh should fix the damn toner. Period.
    73 DE W5SSJ

  4. #14
    Field Supervisor 500+ Posts aabarnes1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    620
    Rep Power
    0
    I've definately jinxed myself posting this, we had another one come in today with grey background. I vacd out the pcdu, scrubbed the mag roller(new type dev unit) cleaned the transfer section-worked a treat. Until 4pm this afternoon. New dev and new type toner went into it 22k ago. I'm syuck now cos I cant change any parts.

  5. #15
    Service Manager 250+ Posts msaeger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    335
    Rep Power
    35
    Yeah I'm with you. I have a bunch of these and the customer actually listened when they were told what volume they should be running so they have not been having issues. They mostly have old dev unit, and old toner.

    When I get a CQ call I have been rebuilding the PCDU with a new dev unit.

    If they want to make 80k a month they should not be buying a 35ppm machine. The customers I had with the old B082's that made that many copies called all the time too.

  6. #16
    E Winter
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by aabarnes1 View Post
    I'd just like to hear back from you lot how you're getting on with these bastards. Since the last tsb and a couple of dev changes our machines seem to be runnig ok in general. Any feedback is welcome -thanks in advance.
    We're still dealing with the same problems. Light image density, coated mag rollers - almost no difference compared to the old stuff.

    And I agree - high volume seems to force the problems earlier, probably becsue of the higher temperature levels inside the dv unit. But I can't tell my customers that this machine isn't made for using it inside the specification targets - especially if the customers already worked with the previous models (NAD, Adonis etc..).

  7. #17
    Service Manager 1,000+ Posts
    MP4/5000 updte/feedback

    Shadow1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    M'ssippi
    Posts
    1,643
    Rep Power
    55
    Mississippi is so poor to begin with, we haven't noticed the recession nearly as much as everyone else.
    73 DE W5SSJ

  8. #18
    ADRIANL
    Guest

    workshop/ field manager

    we've been monitoring one of these models from the start of the problem did the dev/toner change 80k and again at 150k with the rest of the pm items, been sending one dedicated engineer to this m/c, but now solids are going lite checked for relevant sc codes none do forced toner checked drum gnd td values vsg vsp all look within spec only to notice the mag roller is contaminated contact our ricoh head office to be told by the product specialist because of the previous problem techs have worn off the layer on the mag roller from cleaning it to solve the problem order new dev unit our account !!! unfortunately their goes the profit made if any, it seems we are the prototype guinea pigs, something wrong here!!!

  9. #19
    Senior Technician 250+ Posts stephend's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    309
    Rep Power
    34
    For us the part replacement and even entire dev unit was not a problem until the recession start, but was no improvement. This was the reason I said either some units are built in a Friday night during a massive drinking event at the plant, either the QC is sleeping sometimes.
    Last week I had a call for a 4500 with really light copies. Dev life was 80K, mag roller was completely coated, so I replaced with the new one. REplaced the dev and a completely new PCU unit. Customer just received the new toner type so I readjusted the SP modes involved to their default values as the TB advices. In 5 days customer called back now for background and blotches on pages.
    Honest, I never saw a machine overtoning so bad. In the PCU was 3-400 g of toner, cleaning blade was crap. Re dev it and modified back the SP to the values recommended for overtoning. Good part....the new mag roller has no coating on it...so the treatment is improved

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Get the Android App
click or scan for the Copytechnet Mobile App

-= -= -= -= -=


IDrive Remote Backup

Lunarpages Internet Solutions

Advertise on Copytechnet

Your Link Here