MP 6001 SC440

[apump]

Anyone had this the code is main motor. just curious. I have one in the morning to work on..

[tcs04]

Anyone had this the code is main motor. just curious. I have one in the morning to work on..

Sounds like a flipped cleaning blade to me! Are they using Ricoh toner?? We have had trouble with one or two MP6000 series machines and I think they were using Parsia (Not sure)

[apump]

yes they use ricoh toner, but I will check the blades. thanks

[stephend]

Heard a lot of complaints about this style of cleaning blades made in China. Part no. is the same AD04-1140 but the country of origin is now China instead Japan. I don't think the main motor failed so soon but if is made in the same place with the cleaning blade it is very possible.

[apump]

It was the transfer belt, it ripped on the rear side and wedged against the drum...

[stephend]

Sorry to ask...but how many copies/prints on this machine? Was a defective belt or the maintenance was not done in time?
Usually belts are really good and you can obtain even 600 K from them.

[apump]

101k not much at all.. I'm wondering if a staple or something didn't get in there and cause it to shred. I have around 16 of these and haven't seen one do this yet.

[saxon]

I have had it caused by a torn transfer belt. Caused by a drum pick off pawl falling onto the transfer belt after a paper jam under the drum unit.

[TonerMunkeh]

Sorry to ask...but how many copies/prints on this machine? Was a defective belt or the maintenance was not done in time?
Usually belts are really good and you can obtain even 600 K from them.

I saw one 1075 at a solictor's with 2.7 million on the clock, still with it's original transfer belt. Most I see have at least 1.5 million on the clock before they need replacing. Changing the blade every 600k or so makes them last a LOT longer.