Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Ricoh notices

  1. #1
    Geek Extraordinaire 2,500+ Posts KenB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    3,950
    Rep Power
    126

    Ricoh notices

    Howdy,

    I just saw on the Ricoh public download page that printer drivers for Windows XP will no longer be posted as of April 9, 2015.

    That means if you even think you may need them, get them while they're still there.

    A word to the wise would be to download all of them and put them in some sort of library. That way, should you need them in a pinch, you'll have them.

    I've never been a fan of keeping copies of drivers, as they change so frequently, but I think it's safe to say there will be no new versions of XP drivers coming out.
    “I think you should treat good friends like a fine wine. That’s why I keep mine locked up in the basement.” - Tim Hawkins

  2. #2
    Service Manager 1,000+ Posts bob marley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    1,341
    Rep Power
    49

    Re: Ricoh notices

    Thank u for this information

  3. #3
    Service Manager 2,500+ Posts
    Ricoh notices

    sandmanmac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Toronto, ON
    Posts
    3,890
    Rep Power
    159

    Re: Ricoh notices

    Thanks Ken.
    But I never even really consider the OS, and just keep a 32bit and 64bit version of driver for the machines I deal with.
    Ricoh uses the same driver files (if you compare Filesize/ Release date / Version #) throughout ALL of the OS's.
    Frankly, I don't even pay much attention to the model #'s most of the time;
    For example, When I upgrade a machine, I often just rename the printer on the Server/PC's, and don't even bother with changing the driver, since PCL is PCL .....Although, I always set the port to LPR now, after the printing problem I was discussing with you in the 'Connectivity' forum'
    That said, I'm also a bit lazy, and mostly dealing with simple / small workgroups.

  4. #4
    Service Manager 1,000+ Posts
    Ricoh notices


    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    1,671
    Rep Power
    87

    Re: Ricoh notices

    Quote Originally Posted by sandmanmac View Post
    Thanks Ken.
    But I never even really consider the OS, and just keep a 32bit and 64bit version of driver for the machines I deal with.
    Ricoh uses the same driver files (if you compare Filesize/ Release date / Version #) throughout ALL of the OS's.
    Frankly, I don't even pay much attention to the model #'s most of the time;
    For example, When I upgrade a machine, I often just rename the printer on the Server/PC's, and don't even bother with changing the driver, since PCL is PCL .....Although, I always set the port to LPR now, after the printing problem I was discussing with you in the 'Connectivity' forum'
    That said, I'm also a bit lazy, and mostly dealing with simple / small workgroups.

    I think you have got to consider the OS, the don't think the win7 driver will load on XP

  5. #5
    Retired 10,000+ Posts
    Ricoh notices

    slimslob's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Bakersfield, CA
    Posts
    34,242
    Rep Power
    992

    Re: Ricoh notices

    I do the same as Sandy. I have also found that the PCL Mini driver is helpful if you have a customer with an old old machine they want to continue to use but 64 bit drivers are not available. For those who feel they have to download the driver for the OS they are using, I have done extensive checking in the past and found that all 32 bit drivers for a model were the same version, download size, creation date and, most importantly, the same file name.

  6. #6
    Geek Extraordinaire 2,500+ Posts KenB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    3,950
    Rep Power
    126

    Re: Ricoh notices

    Not sure exactly what the issue was, or even if it is related, but last year we had an account trade in 15 MP161s for MP301s.

    All workstations were XP 32 bit.

    They did not update the drivers, as the new machines were so similar.

    The MP301s started throwing SC899 codes almost immediately.

    Once they changed drivers the problem was almost completely eliminated.

    I say "almost" because SC899 is such a common problem these days... for lotsa reasons.
    “I think you should treat good friends like a fine wine. That’s why I keep mine locked up in the basement.” - Tim Hawkins

  7. #7
    Geek Extraordinaire 2,500+ Posts KenB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    3,950
    Rep Power
    126

    Re: Ricoh notices

    Quote Originally Posted by slimslob View Post
    I do the same as Sandy. I have also found that the PCL Mini driver is helpful if you have a customer with an old old machine they want to continue to use but 64 bit drivers are not available. For those who feel they have to download the driver for the OS they are using, I have done extensive checking in the past and found that all 32 bit drivers for a model were the same version, download size, creation date and, most importantly, the same file name.
    I like using the mini driver where the application wants do do all the work.

    I had a law firm a few years back that used WordPerfect (as so many of them do), and they would print 40 - 50 page jobs where some pages were duplexed, others not.

    The PCL 5 and 6 drivers failed. The machines had no PostScript options.

    The alternative would have been to insert blank pages in each file. Needless to say, that was not going to happen.

    I tried the PCL 5 mini driver and BINGO! Instant success.
    “I think you should treat good friends like a fine wine. That’s why I keep mine locked up in the basement.” - Tim Hawkins

  8. #8
    Geek Extraordinaire 2,500+ Posts KenB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    3,950
    Rep Power
    126

    Re: Ricoh notices

    Sorry, I wasn't trying to set off any alarms or cause widespread panic.

    I do, however, anticipate at least a few calls from customers asking why they can't find XP drivers, and that we owe them.

    Just tryin' to be prepared, that's all.
    “I think you should treat good friends like a fine wine. That’s why I keep mine locked up in the basement.” - Tim Hawkins

  9. #9
    AutoMajical Resolutionist 2,500+ Posts
    Ricoh notices

    Tonerbomb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Bugaha
    Posts
    2,589
    Rep Power
    90

    Re: Ricoh notices

    Quote Originally Posted by KenB View Post
    Sorry, I wasn't trying to set off any alarms or cause widespread panic.

    I do, however, anticipate at least a few calls from customers asking why they can't find XP drivers, and that we owe them.

    Just tryin' to be prepared, that's all.
    I just checked the Ricoh driver web page and it's now comes up as 404 not available thanks to KenB.............
    Mystic Crystal Revelations

  10. #10
    Geek Extraordinaire 2,500+ Posts KenB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    3,950
    Rep Power
    126

    Re: Ricoh notices

    Quote Originally Posted by Tonerbomb View Post
    I just checked the Ricoh driver web page and it's now comes up as 404 not available thanks to KenB.............
    Yep, I broke it.

    And you're quite welcome!
    “I think you should treat good friends like a fine wine. That’s why I keep mine locked up in the basement.” - Tim Hawkins

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Get the Android App
click or scan for the Copytechnet Mobile App

-= -= -= -= -=


IDrive Remote Backup

Lunarpages Internet Solutions

Advertise on Copytechnet

Your Link Here