
Originally Posted by
rocky246
The dealership where I work has been a Toshiba dealer for about a two years. I was sent to Chicago to be trained on this model (1 1/2 years ago). We have nothing but complaints about these machines and their light CQ. I agree. I have tried to set the density higher, check the xerographic voltages, & set the transfer higher. Still the copies look light. Comparing 04-111 test copies with test copies on an e-studio 520, shows that the 520 solids are way better. I know were talking about two different machines, but you would think the CQ would be better. We are a KonicaMinolta dealer also. CQ on these machines is far better than the Toshibas. Are our expectations for these machines too high or is this the way these machines are?
Bookmarks