The future of printers?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • fixthecopier
    ALIEN OVERLORD

    2,500+ Posts
    • Apr 2008
    • 4713

    #31
    Re: The future of printers?

    Originally posted by Geo
    Do you know if the customer was paying OEM supplies ..retail or at a discount.?


    They pay retail. Everything oem on that machine is close to $400, cartridges, fuser, belt. That's why they get the boxes at cost.
    The greatest enemy of knowledge isn't ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge. Stephen Hawking

    Comment

    • Bix
      Service Manager

      1,000+ Posts
      • Apr 2018
      • 1421

      #32
      Re: The future of printers?

      Hello,


      I do not talk about those couriers' screens. The screens I speak of measure your hand pressure and code the movement of your hand.

      Comment

      • mikadonovan
        Senior Tech

        Site Contributor
        2,500+ Posts
        • May 2008
        • 2931

        #33
        Re: The future of printers?

        Originally posted by jamesyboy
        the future is INK, Toner is proving to be a bit nasty

        hp pagewide technology

        they will be easier to fix
        Well, I work with both and ink is far more nasty than toner ever thought about being. Some ink I have to work with is poison to the human body and gloves are required. Ink, being a liquid that dries to solid when exposed to air opens up a whole new set of machine related problems, too.
        NEVER ASSUME ANYTHING

        Comment

        • NeoMatrix
          Senior Tech.

          2,500+ Posts
          • Nov 2010
          • 3513

          #34
          Re: The future of printers?

          Originally posted by Bix
          Hello,


          I do not talk about those couriers' screens. The screens I speak of measure your hand pressure and code the movement of your hand.

          The graphometric signature on electronic devices(AdES) – on tablets and smartphones – enables the dematerialization of processes with significant savings, ensuring legal value to signed documents.
          The tablet and smart phone hand signature/signing apps provide no security against hacking or cut and pasting your signature to another document.

          There is another more natural way of signing electronic documents using a your own one-shot/one-off signature, the same as signing any other document. It also locks the one-off signature to that one only document along with the current date into the signing of the document. It is very natural way of signing electronic documents but requires the signee to follow their own encryption rules. If the signatory becomes lazy and does not follow their own encryption key, then their electronic signature could be duplicated across forged electronic documents.

          I see the principle I've developed being implemented by government and law firms in the future. It is a more natural way of signing crucial legal documents. Any non-crucial document signing can use the smart-phone apps with their quick and easy chicken scratch method.

          The principle method is a very natural way of signing all documents,nothing is hard about it, but people will have to adopt an "I care about my security" change in their signing methods. Which means taking the time to do a simple quick encryption hash.



          P.S. The principle method is also a boon for the paper copier/printer industry. Copier manufactures will definitely implement this method as well. The copier industry already uses the encryption principle in copiers, just not in the simple format that I use it.
          Inauguration to the "AI cancel-culture" fraternity 1997...
          •••••• •••[§]• |N | € | o | M | Δ | t | π | ¡ | x | •[§]••• ••••••

          Comment

          Working...