If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
In my experience, it's the less experienced techs who don't use the manuals, they tend to rely on the more experienced techs to read them for them....I use them all the time & go on the manufacturers website at least once a week to check bulletins etc....it's seems strange that I have all the manuals & most of the bulletins....but my colleagues don't & don't know how to use the manufacturers website..
Tip for the day; Treat every problem as your dog would.....If you cant eat it or f*ck it....then p*ss on it & walk away...
I did 3 calls today and had to open my laptop on all 3 calls, the first and last ones had error codes that I needed to look up, and I upgraded firmware on the second call. Sometimes I can go days without the need to use it at all, but then you get days like today
There are 10 types of people in this world, those who understand binary maths and those who don't
It occurred to me that the worst folks for not using the manuals are the customers. I can't count the number of calls I have done that involved doing something the customer could have done, or answering a question by asking them where their manual is.
I used to have a copier that sat in front of a Sergeant Major's desk. He was a real nice guy. A couple of times I had a ticket that involved me going into his office, sitting at his desk across from him, exchanging greetings while I reached under the cabinet to grab the user manual, look up the setting he wanted changed and make the adjustment. I never once told him to look it up, because he was a Sergeant Major and because it counted as a completed call.
The greatest enemy of knowledge isn't ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge. Stephen Hawking
Hate to resurrect a dying thread, but I have to add something;
I constantly cross reference parts numbers between different models (ie: C280 -> C452), mainly for fans, or clutches which more often then not are the exact same between models, and series.
Occasionly, I'll look up some codes if the call comes in while I'm in the office and double check that what I think it is, is right.
They're good to have, even if you haven't used one yet, because the day will come when you need it, and you have no way to access it.
The one blessing of a copier tech. We've seen the exact problem before, we fix it, case closed.
2. Obvious issues
Nothing new here. Copies smudge and ghost. Fuser is shot. Ok replace fuser.
3. Service mode clues.
Failure code C-123? No idea what it is? Go into service mode, pull up a counter of service codes. There it is a with a written description... C-123=Main Motor.
4. Annoying suggestions.
Example: Transport Jam. Manual says "Replace transport motor, or transport clutch, or transport sensor, or main board. No shit, notice they will never say one-way gear or worn bushings or unseated spring, etc. Yea, yea, yea I know manuals aren't written for every variable, hence why I'm writing this.
4. Knowledge Bases. For example Konica has a Knowledge Base. Contrary to reason #3. Knowledge bases give you the real answer based on Konica techs contributions. This is always checked first.
5. Memorizing part numbers or keeping a go-to list of common part numbers.
6. I believe service manuals are biased. The manufacturer doesn't want to reveal their flaws. They will never update them with REAL WORLD solutions.
I am the first to tell a lazy tech to RTFM, but as an experienced tech I find myself looking elsewhere.
(by the way this doesn't include theory manuals, which are actually useful)
The only techs that use manuals or electronic documentation are those that want to repair the equipment properly. Only a "shade tree mechanic" would try to repair problems on newer electronic machines without proper documentation.
The only techs that use manuals or electronic documentation are those that want to repair the equipment properly. Only a "shade tree mechanic" would try to repair problems on newer electronic machines without proper documentation.
I disagree. Partially. For common issues on machines I'm familiar with, looking at the manual isn't necessary. With new models, most codes seem to carry across.
Sometimes, if you followed the manual to the letter, you could spend thousands replacing parts/checking diode operation on boards, when it could be as simple as a broken 5c spring.
Combining Technician experience, with manuals and CTN and cross referencing them all is the best way to go I think.
We try not to leave it at super-gluing the broken plastic bit back. If we can, we use a second hand known-to-be-working part, or failing that, order a new one. If the 2nd hand part is sketchy, we order a new one.
Hate to resurrect a dying thread, but I have to add something;
I constantly cross reference parts numbers between different models (ie: C280 -> C452), mainly for fans, or clutches which more often then not are the exact same between models, and series.
Occasionly, I'll look up some codes if the call comes in while I'm in the office and double check that what I think it is, is right.
They're good to have, even if you haven't used one yet, because the day will come when you need it, and you have no way to access it.
I feel exactly what your saying .
I'm in the process of putting together a massive cross-reference data base using many different makes and model machines. It is part of a bigger project that's been sitting on the back-burner for some time, I just need a new dose of enthusiasm...
Inauguration to the "AI cancel-culture" fraternity 1997... •••••• •••[§]• |N | € | o | M | Δ | t | π | ¡ | x | •[§]••• ••••••
Comment