Hello all new to the forum I had a question I wanted to ask its more like an ethical question thanks to anybody that reads & responds. Basically this is the situation,
About 3 months ago I purchased a printer and it arrived damaged, since I had gotten it for a reasonable price I decided to have a tech come out and look at it before I returned it to see if it would better to fix or send back. When the technician came by he did inspect it and took a look at it and his final verdict was that he would call me back later with a list of parts and or procedures that he would need to do to the machine.
He never called me back, I ended up calling the company back 2 times that week and their response was that the tech was out on the field but he would call me back as soon as he got back to the office. Still did not get a response.
Later that week I ended up purchasing a new machine and its been up and running since but now the printer company that had the tech come by wants to charge me for the service call. I told them I felt no service had been performed since no resolution was done, the tech couldve just as well sat in the parking lot or stared at the machine for 2 hours and I wouldve gotten the same outcome.
Their argument is that since the tech was still on site for 2 hours I am still responsible for payment and this is where the dilema is.
For any service techs that go to businesses, in this particular scenario how do you all see it? Ive asked to speak to the owner of the business and to the tech himself but still havent received calls from them.
Also, keep in mind i had been a customer of this particular business for about 4 years. I had a printer I had purchased from a customer of theirs and their printing rates got transferred to me, I had previously been with them for maybe 4 years or so paying only printing fees (about $170 - $200 month) (no leasing equipment or any other fees) and it wasnt until their printer ran out of juice and they told me they couldnt fix it anymore and I would have to purchase a new printer which I ended up doing on my own for around $1500 less than what they were offering me for the same model.
The new printer I purchased on my own was the one that arrived damaged.
Also, since I had not been paying for leasing or equipment (again just for printing) they had already come by several times int he past wanting me to upgrade printer and always saying the model I have would not be supported due to parts running out so its been a while that they were wanting to me to upgrade, which i did except not thru them. I always felt they were kinda pressuring me due to they were only making money on the pages printed rather than on equipment leasing fees or rental fees.
Thanks to all who respond!
About 3 months ago I purchased a printer and it arrived damaged, since I had gotten it for a reasonable price I decided to have a tech come out and look at it before I returned it to see if it would better to fix or send back. When the technician came by he did inspect it and took a look at it and his final verdict was that he would call me back later with a list of parts and or procedures that he would need to do to the machine.
He never called me back, I ended up calling the company back 2 times that week and their response was that the tech was out on the field but he would call me back as soon as he got back to the office. Still did not get a response.
Later that week I ended up purchasing a new machine and its been up and running since but now the printer company that had the tech come by wants to charge me for the service call. I told them I felt no service had been performed since no resolution was done, the tech couldve just as well sat in the parking lot or stared at the machine for 2 hours and I wouldve gotten the same outcome.
Their argument is that since the tech was still on site for 2 hours I am still responsible for payment and this is where the dilema is.
For any service techs that go to businesses, in this particular scenario how do you all see it? Ive asked to speak to the owner of the business and to the tech himself but still havent received calls from them.
Also, keep in mind i had been a customer of this particular business for about 4 years. I had a printer I had purchased from a customer of theirs and their printing rates got transferred to me, I had previously been with them for maybe 4 years or so paying only printing fees (about $170 - $200 month) (no leasing equipment or any other fees) and it wasnt until their printer ran out of juice and they told me they couldnt fix it anymore and I would have to purchase a new printer which I ended up doing on my own for around $1500 less than what they were offering me for the same model.
The new printer I purchased on my own was the one that arrived damaged.
Also, since I had not been paying for leasing or equipment (again just for printing) they had already come by several times int he past wanting me to upgrade printer and always saying the model I have would not be supported due to parts running out so its been a while that they were wanting to me to upgrade, which i did except not thru them. I always felt they were kinda pressuring me due to they were only making money on the pages printed rather than on equipment leasing fees or rental fees.
Thanks to all who respond!
Comment