KM-6030 banding on enlarged 154% scan of IDs

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • Ingersoll
    Technician
    • Nov 2008
    • 74
    #1

    [CQ] KM-6030 banding on enlarged 154% scan of IDs

    When scanning an ID w/ 154% enlargement using auto or manual exposure the output copy has distinct line banding of certain colors (of original) in output (shades of gray). Maybe a CCD problem?

    Scan_20121213_095238_000074014dfc.pdf
    Tags: banding, km-6030, scan settings, scanning
    • ES-OGT
      Trusted Tech

      100+ Posts
      • Aug 2011
      • 129
      #2
      Re: KM-6030 banding on enlarged 154% scan of IDs

      Have you tried something that's not an ID? I'm guessing it's got a clear coat of some sort on it that could cause problems with light distortion that's seen when it's magnified.

      Just throwing darts here. I've still got a few 6030's in the field but the customer don't do any magnification.

        Comment

        • blackcat4866
          Master Of The Obvious

          Site Contributor
          10,000+ Posts
          • Jul 2007
          • 23008
          #3
          Re: KM-6030 banding on enlarged 154% scan of IDs

          If it's solarized, perhaps you can lay a transparency on the glass before the glossy original.
          If it's a moire' pattern perhaps a change of resolution, original type, file type, or enlargement might help.

          In either case there isn't really a "fix", more like a workaround. =^..^=
          If you'd like a serious answer to your request:
          1) demonstrate that you've read the manual
          2) demonstrate that you made some attempt to fix it.
          3) if you're going to ask about jams include the jam code.
          4) if you're going to ask about an error code include the error code.
          5) You are the person onsite. Only you can make observations.

          blackcat: Master Of The Obvious =^..^=

            Comment

            • Ingersoll
              Technician
              • Nov 2008
              • 74
              #4
              Re: KM-6030 banding on enlarged 154% scan of IDs

              Made a copy of a mouse pad, same thing 100% good, 154% banded.



              Originally posted by ES-OGT
              Have you tried something that's not an ID? I'm guessing it's got a clear coat of some sort on it that could cause problems with light distortion that's seen when it's magnified.

              Just throwing darts here. I've still got a few 6030's in the field but the customer don't do any magnification.

                Comment

                • Ingersoll
                  Technician
                  • Nov 2008
                  • 74
                  #5
                  Re: KM-6030 banding on enlarged 154% scan of IDs

                  Kyocera Tech Supt 1st said "adjust the CCD" then they said "Oh. that copier doesn't have an adjustment for the CCD, guess you'll have to replace it." :-)


                  Originally posted by blackcat4866
                  If it's solarized, perhaps you can lay a transparency on the glass before the glossy original.
                  If it's a moire' pattern perhaps a change of resolution, original type, file type, or enlargement might help.

                  In either case there isn't really a "fix", more like a workaround. =^..^=

                    Comment

                    • blackcat4866
                      Master Of The Obvious

                      Site Contributor
                      10,000+ Posts
                      • Jul 2007
                      • 23008
                      #6
                      Re: KM-6030 banding on enlarged 154% scan of IDs

                      Originally posted by blackcat4866
                      ... If it's a moire' pattern perhaps a change of resolution, original type, file type, or enlargement might help... =^..^=
                      ... and the scan settings? Any of these make a difference?
                      Out of curiosity, what is so special about 154%? 155% is indistinguishable by the naked eye.
                      If you'd like a serious answer to your request:
                      1) demonstrate that you've read the manual
                      2) demonstrate that you made some attempt to fix it.
                      3) if you're going to ask about jams include the jam code.
                      4) if you're going to ask about an error code include the error code.
                      5) You are the person onsite. Only you can make observations.

                      blackcat: Master Of The Obvious =^..^=

                        Comment

                        Previous template Next
                        Working...