emujo
02-09-2016, 01:58 PM
Replacing fleet of 950s with 951s. Current 950 are scanning to SMB shares
172.16.X.X host name
scans\scan\department folder
User name
password..
Current 950 configuration- domain field-empty, DNS-primary/secondary, SMB settings NTLM v1 and default "WORKGROUP", all other network settings (encryption, IPSEC, off or disabled. Scans work every time
New 951s- Same configuration including re using IP address. Each scan results in a folder not found error. The 951s allow browsing (similar to office equipment) and I can browse to the server (host) and drill down to the folders. Using same name/password config..Still not able to scan to the folder. Have not tried scanning to root of host yet. Are there any default settings on the 951s that may be different than the 950s. Production is not my strong point. The file share system is suxe-linux. This is happening across 4 campuses and 2 counties, all of the 950s work. Old office equipment being upgraded with new e series are working after pushing the address books back with PSDA. So we have a campus office with 1 950 and 3-4 e series being replaced. Everything works fine on the office equipment side, but 951s are failing.
I have tried adding the domain, switching to NTLM V1/V2, domain\user name for credentials, with no change (other than login failure with domain added to user name). Any thoughts? Emujo
172.16.X.X host name
scans\scan\department folder
User name
password..
Current 950 configuration- domain field-empty, DNS-primary/secondary, SMB settings NTLM v1 and default "WORKGROUP", all other network settings (encryption, IPSEC, off or disabled. Scans work every time
New 951s- Same configuration including re using IP address. Each scan results in a folder not found error. The 951s allow browsing (similar to office equipment) and I can browse to the server (host) and drill down to the folders. Using same name/password config..Still not able to scan to the folder. Have not tried scanning to root of host yet. Are there any default settings on the 951s that may be different than the 950s. Production is not my strong point. The file share system is suxe-linux. This is happening across 4 campuses and 2 counties, all of the 950s work. Old office equipment being upgraded with new e series are working after pushing the address books back with PSDA. So we have a campus office with 1 950 and 3-4 e series being replaced. Everything works fine on the office equipment side, but 951s are failing.
I have tried adding the domain, switching to NTLM V1/V2, domain\user name for credentials, with no change (other than login failure with domain added to user name). Any thoughts? Emujo