PDA

View Full Version : Can KMs do motor load checks ?


Custom Search


bronco31
08-28-2020, 07:12 PM
example: run just M14, the toner cartridge motor on the BH 958?

pretty important troubleshooting feature no?

all you super techs out there have a nice weekend!

emujo2
08-28-2020, 07:47 PM
46645There are many loads that can be run in I/O mode..Some require different sections to be removed before they will work, but yes, along with clutches, solenoids. and sensor checks. E

Edit..Attached the 958 example to be sure..

tsbservice
08-28-2020, 07:47 PM
example: run just M14, the toner cartridge motor on the BH 958?


Afaik no.

bronco31
08-28-2020, 11:16 PM
there it is OK.. Service Mode, State Confirmation , Load Check thx!

femaster
08-29-2020, 04:26 AM
Really old KM machines had load checks, then for a while KM removed it for some reason. Recent models have thankfully brought it back. Don't know what KM was thinking with removing it!

tsbservice
08-29-2020, 06:52 AM
there it is OK.. Service Mode, State Confirmation , Load Check thx!

Of course there's load check but not for M14 motor you asked...

escalante
08-30-2020, 04:01 AM
Really old KM machines had load checks, then for a while KM removed it for some reason. Recent models have thankfully brought it back. Don't know what KM was thinking with removing it!On the older equipment in Minolta
Di750_Di850 which are between 2000 to 2002.
In Konica: 7075 and 7085.
In konica Minolta: Bizhub PRO 920, 950, 1050, 1200 and 1250.
It has the check-up mode.

Enviado desde mi SM-J701M mediante Tapatalk

Synaux
08-30-2020, 04:11 AM
Really old KM machines had load checks, then for a while KM removed it for some reason. Recent models have thankfully brought it back. Don't know what KM was thinking with removing it!

I always wondered why some models did not have this "feature." It just seems lazy. Heck, the code was already prepped.

On the C654, if you have an old service manual it doesn't even have the load check list. If memory serves, there is a section for it but no list, really? How could this possibly be an afterthought? There is very little doubt in my mind that the engineers did not use this function to troubleshoot (errr... perhaps they didn't--which--possibly explains a few things).

"What were they thinking?!" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kmMhzaF7puM)

Custom Search