dqydj
10-12-2005, 03:15 AM
Staight up I\'m not the best guy to rate the things
I worked on Mita\'s from 1987 to about 2003.
Kyrocera mita at the time were great (except anything that
started with a 40 or 60)
On the HVC
copiers I\'ve found that Minolta and Konica kicked
Butt on mita as far as time between calls and
also longer pm cycles and machine longetivity, plus mitas run so frickin dirty.
Now on the LVC side the 1435 is pretty hard to
debate, yea it ran a little dirty but those damn things
run and run, as long as you clean them every few months
they were awsome.
We still have hundreds of those in the field.
They just won\'t die.
Thanks for letting me vent.
Post edited by: dqydj, at: 2005/10/11 19:18
I worked on Mita\'s from 1987 to about 2003.
Kyrocera mita at the time were great (except anything that
started with a 40 or 60)
On the HVC
copiers I\'ve found that Minolta and Konica kicked
Butt on mita as far as time between calls and
also longer pm cycles and machine longetivity, plus mitas run so frickin dirty.
Now on the LVC side the 1435 is pretty hard to
debate, yea it ran a little dirty but those damn things
run and run, as long as you clean them every few months
they were awsome.
We still have hundreds of those in the field.
They just won\'t die.
Thanks for letting me vent.
Post edited by: dqydj, at: 2005/10/11 19:18