bizhub C35

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Max
    Senior Tech

    500+ Posts
    • Oct 2011
    • 548

    #1

    bizhub C35

    Is there a way to reset a IU counter on those copiers at all? Got a customer screaming and my supplier has run out of reset chips. Any help much appreciated.
  • JR2ALTA
    Service Manager

    Site Contributor
    1,000+ Posts
    • Feb 2010
    • 2028

    #2
    no but there is firmware to extend life to 150%. the drums could go two or three life cycles in my opinion

    Comment

    • avecosat
      Trusted Tech

      250+ Posts
      • Jun 2012
      • 303

      #3
      Re: bizhub C35

      Originally posted by JR2ALTA
      no but there is firmware to extend life to 150%. the drums could go two or three life cycles in my opinion
      Please , I would like to know which is these firmware

      Comment

      • EarthKmTech
        Step aside, noob

        1,000+ Posts
        • May 2009
        • 2139

        #4
        Re: bizhub C35

        Is that a paying customer on a service contract ? If so they have every right to be screaming about tight wads trying to avoid supplying the required parts to keep the machine operational, i.e. new imaging units. If this is the case, this is disgraceful behaviour. I'd hate to work for a company like that.

        Comment

        • Gift
          Service Manager

          1,000+ Posts
          • Mar 2011
          • 2449

          #5
          Re: bizhub C35

          Originally posted by JR2ALTA
          no but there is firmware to extend life to 150%. the drums could go two or three life cycles in my opinion
          any more Info's about this? I just found the new firmware with more option to lower the ATDC adjustemt cycles - is that what you're talking about?

          thx

          Comment

          • Hansoon
            Field Supervisor

            Site Contributor
            2,500+ Posts
            • Sep 2007
            • 3355

            #6
            Re: bizhub C35

            Is that a paying customer on a service contract ? If so they have every right to be screaming about tight wads trying to avoid supplying the required parts to keep the machine operational, i.e. new imaging units. If this is the case, this is disgraceful behaviour. I'd hate to work for a company like that.
            That's a very noble attitude and basically you are right, but.......... As long as the machine fulfils the needs of the customer and if the customer is at the same time a cheapo squeezing the last bit of life out of an Indy what can one do? We like to survive somehow.

            I have lost sales against large dealers (Canon) because they where able to put out new color machines for a lower price than I with my used machines. How? Cause Canon was subsidizing it and likely some Chinese workers will be forced to do unpayed overtime or accept pay cuts too to come to those unrealistic prices.

            I believe that's also somehow disgraceful............

            Also me myself, does hate this kind of work but it is better than having the government "support" me with taxpayers money. There are no alternative jobs free available here and the days we could make mark ups of 25% are gone. I don't know about you guys in the USA, perhaps you live in abundance but here in Europe the markets are more than extremely tight............

            Hans
            “ Sent from my Intel 80286 using MS-DOS 2.0
            https://www.copytechnet.com/images/smilies/biggrin.png

            Comment

            • JR2ALTA
              Service Manager

              Site Contributor
              1,000+ Posts
              • Feb 2010
              • 2028

              #7
              @earthkmtech

              The service contract covers parts that need replacing.

              It's not as if the customer can demand that every two months the machine be rebuilt.

              The issue at hand is that Konica severely underestimates the life of these parts and forces us to replace them. that's a waste.

              Comment

              Working...