Originally Posted by
FrohnB
That seems to be the recurring theme with Horowitz. That YES the FBI fucked up, and skewed their facts to get warrants, and stretched the truth, and screwed up in many ways in their handling of things, and showed bias (but "didn't show bias"), BUUUUUTT are cleared of any "wrongdoing". "Authorized purpose" is what they are throwing around right now, and all that means is that the Courts were unaware of the "skewed facts", and hence "authorized" the warrants and said "yeah, that's messed up, Go investigate it". So the FBI gets off charge free, because they were given the "go ahead" by the courts. But if the truth hadn't been stretched, then NO warrant would have been issued in the first place.
Said that Comey didn't follow procedures and that other employees brought discredit to themselves and the FBI, BUUUUTTT cleared anyone of any "wrongdoing" stating "no political bias in decision making".
Operation fast and furious under Obama. Horowitz says "reckless" operation, and found screwups of “systemic” scope that risked public safety, prompting two senior officials to leave the government, BUUUUUTTTT cleared Holder of "wrongdoing" for his covering up of the crimes.
They say Horowitz is as "Straight down the middle" as it gets when it comes to EVERYTHING, and doesn't "affiliate" with any political party, but a quick search shows he donated to Democratic Senator Michael Bennet of Colorado. Not saying that makes him a dem, but it doesn't look good on that "completely neutral" front.
Bookmarks