Dislikes: 0
Rock musician Neil Young said he won’t sue President Donald Trump for using his music during campaign rallies, saying that he would rather the president focus on saving lives amid the coronavirus pandemic. But Young also taunted the president by suggesting his campaign use a newly penned song titled “Looking For a Leader 2020” — an update of his 2006 single “Lookin’ for a Leader.”
YouTube
Supreme Court says Manhattan DA can get Trump's tax records, but rejects bid by House Democrats
Tax Fraud in State of New York
Even a Pardon won't help Trump for State crimes.
Got to think why HIDE them if there nothing there? UNLESS
Everyone else released there tax returns
Who will Trump Blame?
You're accusing someone of a crime even though there is no proof of any "State Crimes".Originally Posted by bsm2
Supreme Court says Manhattan DA can get Trump's tax records, but rejects bid by House Democrats
Tax Fraud in State of New York
Even a Pardon won't help Trump for State crimes.
Got to think why HIDE them if there nothing there? UNLESS
Everyone else released there tax returns
Who will Trump Blame?Good Media Puppet!
Doesn't matter if "everyone else released their tax returns", SCOTUS says that even though it's something the past 6 Presidents may have done, it has no "dispositive weight" on their decision. Meaning that Trump doesn't have to do what "everyone else did".
Plus, now those 2 cases will go back to the lower courts for litigation, and even after those decisions, there''s no guarantee that his taxes will ever be released to the public.
Keep on wishing on buddy.
Omertà
Yep that's Your Crook buddy keep sailing on that sinking ship.You're accusing someone of a crime even though there is no proof of any "State Crimes".
Doesn't matter if "everyone else released their tax returns", SCOTUS says that even though it's something the past 6 Presidents may have done, it has no "dispositive weight" on their decision. Meaning that Trump doesn't have to do what "everyone else did".
Plus, now those 2 cases will go back to the lower courts for litigation, and even after those decisions, there''s no guarantee that his taxes will ever be released to the public.
Keep on wishing on buddy.
States always have a Grand Jury when there no crimes. Keep on wishing buddy
NY already closed his crooked Trump Foundation.
IF other presidents had a PRIVATE business before they got in office they would be protected, just as Trump is.You're accusing someone of a crime even though there is no proof of any "State Crimes".
Doesn't matter if "everyone else released their tax returns", SCOTUS says that even though it's something the past 6 Presidents may have done, it has no "dispositive weight" on their decision. Meaning that Trump doesn't have to do what "everyone else did".
Plus, now those 2 cases will go back to the lower courts for litigation, and even after those decisions, there''s no guarantee that his taxes will ever be released to the public.
Keep on wishing on buddy.
But most have had no private businesses, but rather have scammed the system by taking money from pac's .. countries for doing their bidding. Not to mention insider trading info to pad their back pockets.
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
No Sale
Lets see Joe Biden tax
returns oh right he released 21 years of tax returns.
You don't understand it's not a requirement for PRIVATE citizens to reveal their tax returns.... Biden has been a lifelong public 'servant' I bet his 'shady'dealings aren't included.No Sale
Lets see Joe Biden tax
returns oh right he released 21 years of tax returns.
In fact there are IRS rules against private citizens having to release their filings.
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
I understand unless your a Crook
like Trump
No Sale wonder Why YOU don't want to see them? Just like everyone else running for PRESIDENT.
SCOTUS Keeps Trump's Financial Records Out of Public Eye - For Now
The Supreme Court issued a mixed verdict on Thursday that will keep President Donald Trump’s tax returns, banking and other documents out of the public eye for the time being.
By 7-2 votes, the justices upheld the Manhattan district attorney’s demand for Trump’s tax returns, but kept a hold on Trump’s financial records that Congress has been seeking for more than a year.
But Trump, who has sought to keep his financial records private, didn’t immediately regard the outcome as a victory.
“The Supreme Court sends case back to Lower Court, arguments to continue. This is all a political prosecution,” Trump wrote in a series of tweets that followed the court rulings.
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
The Supreme Court sends case back to Lower Court, arguments to continue. This is all a political prosecution. I won the Mueller Witch Hunt, and others, and now I have to keep fighting in a politically corrupt New York. Not fair to this Presidency or Administration!
The justices rejected arguments by Trump’s lawyers and the Justice Department that the president is immune from investigation while he holds office or that a prosecutor must show a greater need than normal to obtain the records.
The tax returns are being sought as part of a grand jury investigation.
Because the grand jury process is con
Chief Justice John Roberts wrote both opinions.
“Congressional subpoenas for information from the President, however, implicate special concerns regarding the separation of powers. The courts below did not take adequate account of those concerns,” Roberts wrote in the congressional case.
The ruling returns the case to lower courts, with no clear prospect for when the case might ultimately be resolved.
The tax returns case also is headed back to a lower court, but Trump’s major arguments have now been rejected.
Justice Samuel Alito, who dissented with Justice Clarence Thomas in both cases, warned that future presidents would suffer because of the decision about Trump’s taxes.
“This case is almost certain to be portrayed as a case about the current President and the current political situation, but the case has a much deeper significance,” Alito wrote.
“While the decision will of course have a direct effect on President Trump, what the Court holds today will also affect all future Presidents — which is to say, it will affect the Presidency, and that is a matter of great and lasting importance to the Nation.”
Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. said his investigation, on hold while the court fight played out, will now resume.
“This is a tremendous victory for our nation’s system of justice and its founding principle that no one — not even a president — is above the law. Our investigation, which was delayed for almost a year by this lawsuit, will resume, guided as always by the grand jury’s solemn obligation to follow the law and the facts, wherever they may lead,” Vance said.
The case was argued by telephone in May.
The fight over the congressional subpoenas has significant implications regarding a president’s power to refuse a formal request from Congress.
The subpoenas are not directed at Trump himself. Instead, House committees want records from Deutsche Bank, Capital One and the Mazars USA accounting firm. Mazars also is the recipient of Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance’s subpoena.
Appellate courts in Washington, D.C., and New York focused on the fact that the subpoenas were addressed to third parties asking for records of Trump’s business and financial dealings as a private citizen, not as president.
Two congressional committees subpoenaed the bank documents as part of their investigations into Trump and his businesses.
fidential, the rulings make it likely that none of Trump’s financial records will become public soon.
Posting Permissions
Thanks: 
Likes: 
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks