Wrong Again Amigos
Try too Google the information next time
It REALLY WORKSTrump campaign official pushes baseless Newsweek op-ed claiming Harris may not be VP-eligible
Wrong Again Amigos
Try too Google the information next time
It REALLY WORKSTrump campaign official pushes baseless Newsweek op-ed claiming Harris may not be VP-eligible
i don't give a dan what someone said in the Trump admin...
both I and Slim have proven to you that SHE IS ELIGIBLE.
do you believe EVERYTHING and standby what Biden and his team say? IN election year people say stupid things WITHOUT any LEGAL proof given.
Biden panders to the base (they'll put you in chains again to a black crowd)
if you don't have the mental acuity to discern fact from fiction then MAYBE you should take a hiatus from politics until after the Nov 3rd deadline.. that way all you will have to do then is go thru a case of Kleenex a week, and a bottle of your favorite booze until you come back to reality.
#TrumpPence2020
#PenceDonJr2024
FACT CHECK: Joe Biden Falsely Claims That Trump Is ‘Coddling’ Terrorists Globally
https://www.dailywire.com/news/fact-check-joe-biden-falsely-claims-that-trump-is-coddling-terrorists-globally?itm_source=parsely-api?utm_source=cnemail&utm_medium=email&utm_conten t=081320-news&utm_campaign=position6
Presumptive Democrat presidential nominee Joe Biden falsely claimed on Wednesday that President Donald Trump was “coddling terrorists” around the world.
“And then we’re gonna get to work fixing the mess that President Trump and Vice President Pence have created, both at home and abroad,” Biden claimed. “Through four years of mismanagement and coddling of terrorists and thugs around the world. "
https://twitter.com/i/status/1293656228367929345
Hudson Institute Senior Fellow Rebeccah Heinrichs, who is a national security expert, responded to Biden’s remarks by writing on Twitter: “There isn’t enough spin in the world to claim the Trump admin has ‘coddled terrorists.’ He relaxed the [Rules of Engagement] so that the military [could] more effectively carry out a fast-tempo campaign. And the DoD rightly placed the blame for higher civilian casualties on ISIS.”
Trump has taken out numerous top terrorists around the world throughout the course of his administration. Early on, The Washington Post reported that under Trump’s leadership, according to “Brett McGurk, the State Department’s senior envoy to the anti-Islamic State coalition” at the time, the U.S. military’s gains in the war against ISIS had “dramatically accelerated.”
During the Trump-era, the U.S. government has taken out or directly assisted other nations in taking out:
- Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi; top ISIS leader
- Qassem Soleimani; Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps-Quds Force commander
- Qasim al-Rimi; leader of Al-Qa’ida in the Arabian Peninsula
- Abdelmalek Droukdel; head of al-Qaeda in the Islamic Magreb
- Hajji Taysir; senior ISIS leader
- Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis; founder of the Kataeb Hezbollah, or Hezbollah Brigades
- Abu Ali al-Janubi; ISIS’ senior media director
- Hamza Bin Laden; Al Qaeda senior leader and son of Osama bin Laden
- Abu Hasan al-Muhajir; top ISIS spokesperson
- Asim Umar; head of al-Qaeda in the Indian Subcontinent
The Trump administration has also designated white supremacist groups as terrorist organizations and pushed to designate a neo-Nazi group as a terrorist organization.
The RAND Corporation, a non-profit institution that provides objective research services and public policy analysis, said that “homegrown terrorism increased” during the Obama-Biden administration.
Time Magazine reported:
Yet some analysts argue that by adapting a less forward-leaning U.S. approach, the world has grown more dangerous on Obama’s watch. The rise of ISIS has unnerved nations around the world, and triggered refugee flows that has sent cracks deeper into European fault lines. Both Russia and China are expanding their spheres of influence without significant U.S. pushback. North Korea keeps firing missiles, and Iran—despite 2015’s nuclear accord—shows little sign of reforming its theocratic ways. Libya has turned violent, and largely ungoverned, since the U.S. and NATO helped Libyan rebels remove longtime dictator Muammar Gaddafi in 2011. All of these places can turn into incubators for terror.When former President Barack Obama was making the decision of whether to go into Pakistan and kill Osama bin Laden, Joe Biden was one of the only people in the administration to allegedly advise the president against going in and getting bin Laden, according to a fact-check by The Washington Post.
In fact, declassified documents from the raid inside bin Laden’s Pakistani compound in 2011 revealed that he wanted to assassinate then-President Barack Obama to make “totally unprepared” Biden the next President of the United States, predicting that Biden would lead the U.S. “into a crisis.”
Bin Laden instructed terrorists to “not to target visits by U.S. Vice President Biden” and to instead focus on Obama or then-CIA Director David Petraeus.
“The reason for concentrating on them is that Obama is the head of infidelity and killing him will automatically make Biden take over the presidency for the remainder of the term, as it is the norm over there,” Bin Laden wrote. “Biden is totally unprepared for that post, which will lead the United States into a crisis.”
do you believe EVERYTHING and standby what Trump and his team say? IN election year people say stupid things WITHOUT any LEGAL proof given.
Trump panders to the base.
if you don't have the mental acuity to discern fact from fiction then MAYBE you should take a hiatus from politics until after the Nov 3rd deadline.. that way all you will have to do then is go thru a case of Kleenex a week, and a bottle of your favorite booze until you come back to reality.
Rose McGowan famous in the #MeToo movement.
Rose McGowan Blasts Kamala Harris: ‘How Many Predators Bankroll You?’
A movement Harris climbed on board with during the Brett K. confirmation hearings.
Democrats hoping to make Kamala Harris a new symbol of women’s liberation should be re-thinking that idea heading into November.
Not only does the California senator have a pretty well-known record for kicking off her political career via a romantic relationship with a powerful married man back in the 1990s, it turns out one of her past supporters included Harvey Weinstein, the former Hollywood megaproducer whose depredations were the main fuel behind the #MeToo movement.
Considering this is the same woman who once condemned convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein’s law firm on the same day that six partners in that same law firm held a fundraiser for her presidential campaign — coordinated by her own husband — the hypocrisy might not be surprising, but it’s still galling.
Harris’ ties to Weinstein came to light most recently when Hollywood #MeToo activist Rose McGowan — a polarizing figure who regularly infuriates both the left and the right ends of the political spectrum — took to Twitter to respond to a report that President Donald Trump and his daughter Ivanka had both contributed to Harris’ 2014 campaign for re-election as California attorney general.
According to a Sacramento Bee report from 2019, then-private citizen Donald Trump donated a total of $6,000 to Harris’ campaign. Ivanka Trump donated $2,000.
Given that Harris has just been named Biden’s running mate, it’s possible in hindsight to debate the wisdom of Trump’s choice.
What’s not as open to debate, though, is Harris’ decision to accept $5,000 in donations from Weinstein — making her one of numerous, overwhelmingly Democratic politicians, who benefited from the financial support of a man who, as Forbes reported in February, had faced “accusations and rumors for decades about allegations of inappropriate sexual relationships and even assault.”
“Did you return the money Weinstein gave you?” McGowan asked in a Twitter post directed to Harris. “How many predators bankroll you?”
USA Today reported in October 2017 that Harris passed on the $5,000 her campaign received from Weinstein to a women’s rights organization based in California.
It’s worth remembering that October 2017 was when Weinstein’s Hollywood star started to plummet to earth after The New York Times published accusations against Weinstein going back 30 years.
In other words, a creature of California like Harris — moving in the highest circles of liberal politics — likely knew very well about the rumors regarding Weinstein.
His money was fine, though, until those rumors made the media.
And McGowan wasn’t impressed by the news that Harris had donated Weinstein’s donation.
One look at the flood of responses to McCowan’s tweet gives an idea of how lunatic-left Kamala Harris’ diehard supporters are.
A sea of tweets bashed McGowan for raising questions about Harris’ integrity, broken only by a few islands of those applauding the actress.
The liberal minds are already in lockstep about Harris. Desperate to defeat Trump, they know full well that in the event of a Biden victory in November, Harris is only one heartbeat away from the presidency. (And with Biden, that one heartbeat might be a little fainter than usual.)
But all the liberal social media posts in the world can’t make the fundamental issues of Kamala Harris go away.
It’s no secret that she used a romantic relationship with Willie Brown, the powerful California politician, to get her career off the ground (Brown admitted as much in a 2019 guest piece for the San Francisco Chronicle.)
If that’s a new symbol of women’s liberation (rather than a twist on the world’s oldest profession), Democrats should at least have to explain that.
If Harris was perfectly happy to accept donations from the likes of Weinstein, when it appears his reputation for preying on starlets was no secret to the California crowd, Democrats should have to explain that too.
And while she’s at it, she can explain again how she had the brazenness to criticize the law firm that represented a sexual predator like Epstein, then turn around, as The Associated Press reported in July 2019, and take money from its employers — on literally the same day.
Of course, the mainstream media will be as protective of Harris as those Twitter responders who filled McGowan’s feed with indignant responses that in many cases went beyond insulting.
But in 2020, the mainstream media aren’t the gatekeepers they have been in the past, and Democrats seeing the Biden-Harris ticket as a means to remove President Donald Trump better get used to questions like this.
Every hypocritical word from Harris or her new political patron is going to be hit as hard or harder — and if history is any guide, there’s going to be no shortage of hypocrisy coming from the Democratic ticket.
Bookmarks