Typical. The 3 science boys are allergic to science. They ignore science when it comes to abortion and refuse to admit that a baby can live outside the womb long before 9-months. The earliest a baby has been born and survived is 21 weeks and 5 days.
They refuse to go with the science when it comes to Black Lives Matter protests.
These guys don't care what science says. The facts are clear.
Because I tried to have an honest discussion with you guys. I bought up facts, yall ignored them.
And, please, the country was split way before Trump came along. That's what brought you Trump. I just don't see where any of you liberals are willing to have an honest conversation when you refuse to address relevant questions. We can try again if you want.
Edit: You're ignoring the facts/science now when it come to BLM protests. Care to address that?
Facts are facts not those you pick and choose to support your point of view.
If you want to flood every thread with dark heart comments you are free to do so.
Embattled Trump supporters know the country has taken a steep negative dive ever since he has become President in 2016. America is definitely not great again. It is far more divided, far more in debt, far more corrupt, far less trusted, far more polluted, far more violent, there is far more poverty, far more unemployment and the COVID-19 pandemic is far worse than it has to be.
I find it healthy to tune out US politics for the next few months.
US citizens are tired of the Republican party, who now represent a clear minority view and the desperation of the old white men who run it to hold onto power in any despicable or hypocritical way possible.
There you go again claiming to want to have an intelligent conversation and I asked you a direct question about BLM protests and what science says about social distancing.
Instead of answering the question, you go off on some tangent and at the very end you tell me you're gonna ignore U.S. politics for the next few months.
How am I supposed to respond to that?
Bookmarks