Dislikes: 0
Originally Posted by NomisNirrad
- Overall, we rate Natural News a Questionable source based on the promotion of quackery level pseudoscience and conspiracy theories, as well as extreme right wing bias. This is one of the most discredited sources on the internet.
Funded by / Ownership
Natural News is owned by Mike Adams, who owns numerous other fake and or controversial websites. The website, like all of Mike Adams’s properties, is funded through online advertising.
Analysis / Bias
In review, Mike Adams is known as the Health Ranger according to Rationalwiki. However, they point out dozens of cases where his claims are false. Besides promoting pseudoscience, Natural News is an extreme right-wing biased source that frequently promotes Donald Trump propaganda such as these: President Trump has a constitutional MANDATE to use the military to protect our southern border – Richard Sacks. This article is sourced to Natural News and Brighteon News, which we have never heard of. In this conspiracy story, there is zero evidence and hence why it is a conspiracy: CONFIRMED: Barack Obama was running the entire spygate operation that violated federal law to spy on Trump.campaign officials.
In general, politically, all stories favor the right and promote pseudoscience such as chemtrails, the Sandy Hook shooting being a false flag: Sandy Hook: mind-control flicker effect. Lastly, this source denies the consensus on climate change without evidence as seen here: Climate change cultists are now taking over your local weather forecast.
A factual search reveals that Natural News has failed too many fact checks to list here.
Overall, we rate Natural News a Questionable source based on the promotion of quackery level pseudoscience and conspiracy theories, as well as extreme right-wing bias. This is one of the most discredited sources on the internet. (7/21/2016) Updated (D. Van Zandt 3/02/2019)
... an embarrassing link to post on CTN where you know the source is going to be checked. You should stick to Parler to post this crap.
Sounds like you're referring to CNN. And we know they're trash and have it on tape.
- Overall, we rate Natural News a Questionable source based on the promotion of quackery level pseudoscience and conspiracy theories, as well as extreme right wing bias. This is one of the most discredited sources on the internet.
Funded by / Ownership
Natural News is owned by Mike Adams, who owns numerous other fake and or controversial websites. The website, like all of Mike Adams’s properties, is funded through online advertising.
Analysis / Bias
In review, Mike Adams is known as the Health Ranger according to Rationalwiki. However, they point out dozens of cases where his claims are false. Besides promoting pseudoscience, Natural News is an extreme right-wing biased source that frequently promotes Donald Trump propaganda such as these: President Trump has a constitutional MANDATE to use the military to protect our southern border – Richard Sacks. This article is sourced to Natural News and Brighteon News, which we have never heard of. In this conspiracy story, there is zero evidence and hence why it is a conspiracy: CONFIRMED: Barack Obama was running the entire spygate operation that violated federal law to spy on Trump.campaign officials.
In general, politically, all stories favor the right and promote pseudoscience such as chemtrails, the Sandy Hook shooting being a false flag: Sandy Hook: mind-control flicker effect. Lastly, this source denies the consensus on climate change without evidence as seen here: Climate change cultists are now taking over your local weather forecast.
A factual search reveals that Natural News has failed too many fact checks to list here.
Overall, we rate Natural News a Questionable source based on the promotion of quackery level pseudoscience and conspiracy theories, as well as extreme right-wing bias. This is one of the most discredited sources on the internet. (7/21/2016) Updated (D. Van Zandt 3/02/2019)
... an embarrassing link to post on CTN where you know the source is going to be checked.
- Overall, we rate Natural News a Questionable source based on the promotion of quackery level pseudoscience and conspiracy theories, as well as extreme right wing bias. This is one of the most discredited sources on the internet.
Funded by / Ownership
Natural News is owned by Mike Adams, who owns numerous other fake and or controversial websites. The website, like all of Mike Adams’s properties, is funded through online advertising.
Analysis / Bias
In review, Mike Adams is known as the Health Ranger according to Rationalwiki. However, they point out dozens of cases where his claims are false. Besides promoting pseudoscience, Natural News is an extreme right-wing biased source that frequently promotes Donald Trump propaganda such as these: President Trump has a constitutional MANDATE to use the military to protect our southern border – Richard Sacks. This article is sourced to Natural News and Brighteon News, which we have never heard of. In this conspiracy story, there is zero evidence and hence why it is a conspiracy: CONFIRMED: Barack Obama was running the entire spygate operation that violated federal law to spy on Trump.campaign officials.
In general, politically, all stories favor the right and promote pseudoscience such as chemtrails, the Sandy Hook shooting being a false flag: Sandy Hook: mind-control flicker effect. Lastly, this source denies the consensus on climate change without evidence as seen here: Climate change cultists are now taking over your local weather forecast.
A factual search reveals that Natural News has failed too many fact checks to list here.
Overall, we rate Natural News a Questionable source based on the promotion of quackery level pseudoscience and conspiracy theories, as well as extreme right-wing bias. This is one of the most discredited sources on the internet. (7/21/2016) Updated (D. Van Zandt 3/02/2019)
... an embarrassing link to post on CTN where you know the source is going to be checked. You should stick to Parler to post this crap.
It's the natural progression of things. As sources start telling them what they don't want to hear they have to go deeper into the tinfoil hat zone to find what they DO want to hear.
... the Natural News is a great example of why you should not blindly trust the media. The Natural News panders to a select group of far right voices, the Deplorables. It feeds their beliefs purely for profit,aka a grift, because they are so vulnerable to it.
... I am not saying that you cannot trust all media but when a media source is labelled as quackery, reader be-aware!
Is the same true for some left wing sites? If so, which ones?
Of course there are far left conspiracy theory sites. Sorry, I don't search them out so I can't name any. I'm not hedging, I just don't look for them.
I would say CNN, CNBC, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, NBC, Fox, NY Times, Google, Facebook, etc. They all tend to suppress the truth when it come to anything conservative, including the Constitution.
Agreed. Left wingers don't understand that they're fed probably more bullshit than right wingers. The only difference is that their news sources are considered main stream.
Why do you assign partisanship to the Constitution? It is for everyone, not just conservatives.
Posting Permissions
Thanks: 
Likes: 
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks