Any stargazers out there...?

[NeoMatrix]

If the sun was a big piece of Oak firewood you would be correct, it would reduce in size as time moved on and burnt out many years ago..The sun is a Gianormous ball of gas, mostly hydrogen, under immense pressure. This immense pressure generates heat and induces fusion. When hydrogen fuses it becomes another element (Helium in this case) and gives off light in the process. The sun will continue to work this way until it can no longer fuse the elements into something higher up the food chain. In our case it will stop at carbon and be the biggest diamond around for a few light years. But amazingly enough it will still have the same mass it has at the moment, and our earth (if anything is left) will continue to orbit around this stellar core. E

Some scientists openly admit ,they don't know where the main power source of the Sun is derrived from :"There are strange unearthly phenomenon along the way".

htttps://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2017/09/05/the-suns-energy-doesnt-come-from-fusing-hydrogen-into-helium-mostly/#62b5fe8d70f9

The Sun's Energy Doesn't Come From Fusing Hydrogen Into Helium (Mostly)

[emujo2]

Read it and understand what the article is saying..Don't agree or disagree..But I will say when you post "the sun is a ball of metals", then post a link that 100% contradicts your statement, but you still will use it to rebuke my comments, I again have to question your beliefs. E

[theengel]

You see? He saw some videos about magnets losing their magnetism in heat, combined with the fact that there is some iron in the sun, and concluded that the sun must not be hot because it didn't lose its magnetism. Adding to that something about orbits and revolutions (I think he was just throwing those in to sound smart--I don't think they have anything to do with his line of thinking). Anyway, he can't be bothered with the hundreds of other facts about the sun, because it involves thinking about too many things at once. He can't hold these thoughts, and also introduce the idea of nuclear fusion (and how that might effect a magnetic field) or even accept known facts about the sun that aren't understandable right now. He can grasp on to those two things. Heat affects magnets. That's it. Leave everything else out.

Fascinating.

[emujo2]

Some scientists openly admit ,they don't know where the main power source of the Sun is derrived from :"There are strange unearthly phenomenon along the way".

htttps://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2017/09/05/the-suns-energy-doesnt-come-from-fusing-hydrogen-into-helium-mostly/#62b5fe8d70f9

The Sun's Energy Doesn't Come From Fusing Hydrogen Into Helium (Mostly)

:"There are strange unearthly phenomenon along the way".

Anything that happens anywhere off the earth is "unearthly" doesn't mean it's not unsunly

[NeoMatrix]

:"There are strange unearthly phenomenon along the way".

Anything that happens anywhere off the earth is "unearthly" doesn't mean it's not unsunly

The "facts" however illusive will always stand.
Unearthly pretains to any number of universal offworld phenomena.
The actual atomic interactions of the Sun are illusive enigmatic and complex, "at present". I don't profess to know the "exact" atomic process.

The majority would tend to agree, it is interest when reading other scientist papers, how they raise red flags within their own field of study. When they start to raise more questions requiring further answers. It must bemuse student phyisicts ability to move their comprehension forward when those learning students are presented with conflicting science fact. Example: The electron is both a particle and a wave.

Where does science fact start and science fiction end?
If we knew the final answer, it would no longer be call research.

Any pioneering scientist/reseacher who moves their field of reseach outside of the science status quo, is marginalised.
When those same scientist become recognised, every other scientist jumps on the band wagon for a share of the science spot light... Oh I knew this, I knew that, whats what big deal. But those same scientist were so ready to crucify thier fellow researcher before he/she reached recognition status.

[theengel]

Electrons are not waves. They are particles. They are always particles.

[slimslob]

Electrons are not waves. They are particles. They are always particles.

Guess again boy child. Are Electrons Particles or Waves? The Surprising Answer is … YES! – The Science Assayer

[BLADE]

Guess again boy child. Are Electrons Particles or Waves? The Surprising Answer is … YES! – The Science Assayer

kinda by weird coincidence the home page on the above site had an article about virus research

[theengel]

electrons and other particles also have wave properties similar to those observed for light

That doesn't make them waves. They are still particles.

[emujo2]

I really have a hard time saying this, but I agree with Neo on this..Electrons are both particles and waves as demonstrated in the dual slit experiment decades ago. When you start talking about things working a the quantum level anything can happen..We know that "particles" are streaming when you fire an electron gun at a CRT, but the interferance pattern generated in the dual slit expeiment would indicate they also act as waves..E