Thanks: 
Likes: Originally Posted by Phil B.
There waiting on YOUR call Tuesday please let us all know How That GOES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Dislikes: 0
There waiting on YOUR call Tuesday please let us all know How That GOES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Postmaster General DeJoy Could Have Violated ‘Federal & State Campaign Finance Laws
Another win for Trump!
Supreme Court Makes Unanimous Ruling Regarding November Elections
It seems that at least once or twice a week, the Supreme court of the United States hands President Trump a win. Keep in mind that this is a court that is 44% against him.
This time, SCOTUS made a huge decision in a case dealing with faithless electors in the election process, and guess what? The decision came unanimously!
As you may already know, an elector is someone who is chosen by their state to cast that state's electoral vote for the general election based upon the majority vote of the residents of that state.
A faithless elector is one who defies the millions of people in their state and just votes however they want to, specifically contrary to the popular vote of that state.
In a 9-0 ruling, the court said that those sanctions -- in Washington a fine and in Colorado being removed and replaced as an elector -- are constitutional.
The cases come after a group of Democratic electors that called themselves the "Hamilton Electors" voted for moderate Republicans instead of Hillary Clinton in 2016, in an unsuccessful effort to convince Republican electors to vote for somebody besides President Trump.
"Among the devices States have long used to achieve their object are pledge laws, designed to impress on electors their role as agents of others," Justice Elena Kagan wrote in the court's opinion. "That direction accords with the Constitution—as well as with the trust of a Nation that here, We the People rule.”
Though many voters don't realize it, when Americans cast their ballots in presidential elections they are actually voting for "electors" who later cast the official ballots that decide the presidential election. They almost always rubber-stamp the popular vote winner in their state, but at times have voted for a different candidate, as the Hamilton Electors did in 2016.
What does the SCOTUS ruling on faithless electors mean? - YouTube
It's not often anymore that we get a unanimous ruling by the Supreme Court. So when it does happen, you'd better bet that they got this one right.
Shannon Bream
@ShannonBream
BREAKING: #SCOTUS rules unanimously that states can punish faithless electors who decide to show up for the Electoral College vote and cast their ballots against the way their states voted.
BOMBSHELL: NH Elections Inspector Arrested After Admitting 'I Voted Twice' – Project Veritas Presents Evidence to AG’s Office (VIDEO)
So Democrats aren't worried that there will be voter fraud in the upcoming election? That's probably because they know that the only ones dishonest enough to commit fraud are Democrats.
They don't have to worry about a bunch of conservatives lying because they want to do the right thing.
But Project Veritas has hard evidence proving a man voted twice in the 2016 election.
Authorities arrested a New Hampshire man on Thursday for voting twice during the November 2016 election.
Attorney General Gordon MacDonald said 65-year-old Vincent Marzello of West Lebanon, New Hampshire, was charged with Wrongful Voting for voting twice during the November 8, 2016 General Election.
MacDonald said Marzello voted once as Vincent Marzello and once as Helen Elisabeth Ashley.
In addition, a civil enforcement action was issued against Marzello for applying for and obtaining a ballot in a name other than his own.
Here is the video from James O'Keefe in which he had to go down to the Attorney General's office to bring the issue back up because it has been nearly a year and nothing had been done about it. On top of that, Marzello was also put in charge as an election inspector.
James O'Keefe
@JamesOKeefeIII
BREAKING: Meet Vincent Marzello, the New Hampshire man just arrested by @NH_DOJ for DOUBLE VOTING in 2016. His arrest comes less than 24 hours AFTER @Project_Veritas presented evidence. MUCH MORE TO THIS STORY! Coverup? Stay tuned…
https://twitter.com/i/status/1301621857339277312
In the announcement from the Attorney General's office,
Marzello was charged with a Class B Felony for violating RSA 659:34, I (b) for knowingly voting more than once for an office or measure for voting twice in the City of Lebanon, during the November 8, 2016 General Election, by voting once as Vincent Marzello and once as Helen Elisabeth Ashley.
In addition, a civil enforcement action was commenced against Mr. Marzello, pursuant to RSA 659:34, I (c), for applying for and obtaining a ballot in a name other than his own during the November 8, 2016 General Election, by using the name Helen Elisabeth Ashley.
This office has been in communication with the City of Lebanon's election officials regarding the allegations against Mr. Marzello.
This office also learned that the New Hampshire Democratic Party had appointed Helen Elisabeth Ashley as an Inspector of Election and by a letter, dated August 27, 2020, suspended that appointment effective immediately.
The investigation into this case was conducted by New Hampshire State Police and is being prosecuted by Assistant Attorney General Nicholas Chong Yen of the Election Law Unit.
BSBOMBSHELL: NH Elections Inspector Arrested After Admitting 'I Voted Twice' – Project Veritas Presents Evidence to AG’s Office (VIDEO)
So Democrats aren't worried that there will be voter fraud in the upcoming election? That's probably because they know that the only ones dishonest enough to commit fraud are Democrats.
They don't have to worry about a bunch of conservatives lying because they want to do the right thing.
But Project Veritas has hard evidence proving a man voted twice in the 2016 election.
Authorities arrested a New Hampshire man on Thursday for voting twice during the November 2016 election.
Attorney General Gordon MacDonald said 65-year-old Vincent Marzello of West Lebanon, New Hampshire, was charged with Wrongful Voting for voting twice during the November 8, 2016 General Election.
MacDonald said Marzello voted once as Vincent Marzello and once as Helen Elisabeth Ashley.
In addition, a civil enforcement action was issued against Marzello for applying for and obtaining a ballot in a name other than his own.
Here is the video from James O'Keefe in which he had to go down to the Attorney General's office to bring the issue back up because it has been nearly a year and nothing had been done about it. On top of that, Marzello was also put in charge as an election inspector.
James O'Keefe
@JamesOKeefeIII
BREAKING: Meet Vincent Marzello, the New Hampshire man just arrested by @NH_DOJ for DOUBLE VOTING in 2016. His arrest comes less than 24 hours AFTER @Project_Veritas presented evidence. MUCH MORE TO THIS STORY! Coverup? Stay tuned…
https://twitter.com/i/status/1301621857339277312
In the announcement from the Attorney General's office,
Marzello was charged with a Class B Felony for violating RSA 659:34, I (b) for knowingly voting more than once for an office or measure for voting twice in the City of Lebanon, during the November 8, 2016 General Election, by voting once as Vincent Marzello and once as Helen Elisabeth Ashley.
In addition, a civil enforcement action was commenced against Mr. Marzello, pursuant to RSA 659:34, I (c), for applying for and obtaining a ballot in a name other than his own during the November 8, 2016 General Election, by using the name Helen Elisabeth Ashley.
This office has been in communication with the City of Lebanon's election officials regarding the allegations against Mr. Marzello.
This office also learned that the New Hampshire Democratic Party had appointed Helen Elisabeth Ashley as an Inspector of Election and by a letter, dated August 27, 2020, suspended that appointment effective immediately.
The investigation into this case was conducted by New Hampshire State Police and is being prosecuted by Assistant Attorney General Nicholas Chong Yen of the Election Law Unit.
...Bolton told Fox's MacCallum that the advisers were against both the flight and the drive. Atlantic's Goldberg admitted that such accounts "may be true" but insisted that Trump has used "losers" on other occasions. Yet, that was not the point of the account about the cemetery.
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks