Let the truth be known

[Phil B.]

BWAHAHA yup it's falling apart!

Even in NYC, Anti-Trump Women's March Draws Lackluster Crowd

The 2020 edition of the Women’s March in New York City proved to be a pale shadow of the original.
in 2017, the New York Daily News estimated that 400,000 marchers descended upon Trump Tower.

On Saturday, The Associated Press reported that the New York City crowd numbered in what it termed “hundreds.”
The crowd for the Washington march was reported as “several thousand” by the AP, well below last year’s reported 100,000. In 2017, march organizers reported that their crowd numbered 500,000, according to The Washington Post.
Marches were held around the country, with anti-Trump protesters citing a variety of issues.

[Phil B.]

The anti-Trump nature of the 2017 Women’s March will be blurred for anyone who relies on a photograph currently displayed at the National Archives and Records Administration as a promotion for its exhibit on women’s suffrage.
The National Archives used a photograph from the 2017 demonstration as part of a promotional display for an exhibit keyed to the 100th anniversary of American women being granted the right to vote in 1920. The 2017 photo was paired with an image of a 1913 suffrage march in Washington to show two protests in the same place but a century apart.

However, the 2017 photo has been altered, according to The Washington Post.
The National Archives, which on its website calls itself “the nation’s record keeper,” blurred the name of President Donald Trump where it was used on protest signs, and also blurred references to female genitals, which were present on some protest signs.
The Post used as an example a sign that originally read “God Hates Trump” but now has the president’s name blurred. A sign reading “Trump & GOP — Hands Off Women” also has Trump’s name blurred.

So is this another partisan hit job?

or just a fuck up on their part... I think -=IF=- you bother to READ the article, you will see it is clearly the first choice!

National Archives Admits It Doctored Photo of Anti-Trump Protest

[copier addict]

The anti-Trump nature of the 2017 Women’s March will be blurred for anyone who relies on a photograph currently displayed at the National Archives and Records Administration as a promotion for its exhibit on women’s suffrage.
The National Archives used a photograph from the 2017 demonstration as part of a promotional display for an exhibit keyed to the 100th anniversary of American women being granted the right to vote in 1920. The 2017 photo was paired with an image of a 1913 suffrage march in Washington to show two protests in the same place but a century apart.

However, the 2017 photo has been altered, according to The Washington Post.
The National Archives, which on its website calls itself “the nation’s record keeper,” blurred the name of President Donald Trump where it was used on protest signs, and also blurred references to female genitals, which were present on some protest signs.
The Post used as an example a sign that originally read “God Hates Trump” but now has the president’s name blurred. A sign reading “Trump & GOP — Hands Off Women” also has Trump’s name blurred.

So is this another partisan hit job?

or just a fuck up on their part... I think -=IF=- you bother to READ the article, you will see it is clearly the first choice!

National Archives Admits It Doctored Photo of Anti-Trump Protest

And if they had left it unblurred you would be complaining that they were trying to trash donny. You are quite the snowflake. Lol.

[Phil B.]

The Trump White House was criticized back in 2018 for its slow and ineffective response to Hurricane Maria, despite administration claims that thousands of workers and tens of thousands of pounds of supplies were airlifted to Puerto Rico as soon as it was safe.
“Carlos Acevedo, director of Puerto Rico’s Office of Emergency Management, was dismissed Saturday,” CNN says. “The governor appointed Maj. Gen. José J. Reyes, the adjutant general of the Puerto Rico National Guard, to replace him.”
“There are thousands of people who made sacrifices to bring aid to the south and it’s unforgivable that resources have been kept in a warehouse,” the governor added in a statement acknowledging Acevedo’s forced departure.

WHOA!!! stop the presses! You mean to tell me that #45 received a YUUUUGE RASH OF SHIT for not responding quickly, but that slimeball HELD all those supplies that the US sent them WEREN'T passed out?

I guess Trump was right again... but the dims just can't help but to TRASH the President! I'm SURE nobody will apologize to President Trump for being lied about! Typical treatment!

Puerto Rico emergency director fired after residents discover warehouse full of Hurricane Maria supplies - CNN

**NOTE the CNN link was found in this 'supposed FAKE NEWS' outlet ---->
Warehouse Filled With Hurricane Maria Supplies Discovered Years Later In Puerto Rico | The Daily Wire

[Phil B.]

Political figures have long used their families to route power and benefits for their own self-enrichment. In my new book, “Profiles in Corruption: Abuse of Power by America’s Progressive Elite,” one particular politician — Joe Biden — emerges as the king of the sweetheart deal, with no less than five family members benefiting from his largesse, favorable access and powerful position for commercial gain. In Biden’s case, these deals include foreign partners and, in some cases, even US taxpayer dollars.
The Biden family’s apparent self-enrichment involves five family members: Joe’s son Hunter, son-in-law Howard, brothers James and Frank, and sister Valerie.
When this subject came up in 2019, Biden declared, “I never talked with my son or my brother or anyone else — even distant family — about their business interests. Period.”

How five members of Joe Biden’s family got rich through his connections

[Phil B.]

Ep. 1162 Be Very Careful, The Media is Setting You Up | Dan Bongino

[Phil B.]

The news media is to blame for dividing America, according to a new poll.
A Hill-HarrisX poll released Friday found that 75 percent of those polled believe how the media report the news further divides America politically, according to The Hill.


HarrisX polled 1,001 registered voters across the country and reported a margin of error of plus or minus 3.1 percentage points.
The poll found only seven percent of respondents said the media’s reporting has made the country less divided, while 17 percent said the media had no impact on the nation’s political division.
Majorities across the political spectrum were united in pointing the finger at the media for exacerbating divisions. The poll found that 84 percent of Republicans, 74 percent of Democrats and 69 percent of independents believe the media is an agent of division.

Poll: Huge Majority Blames News Media for Political Division

[Phil B.]

Poll: Impeachment Continues To Backfire as Majority Oppose Removing Trump

RealClearPolitics - Election Other - Trump Impeachment and Removal From Office: Support/Oppose

This involved the impeachment vote against Trump, which coincided almost precisely with the moment the polling average began turning against the Democrats.
One could say the die had been cast long before the vote had been taken; the impeachment inquiry, like an ocean liner at full steam toward a predetermined destination, is a tricky and unwieldy thing to turn in an instant.


They were no closer to removing him, but they’d rolled the dice and taken their chances. And the polling average continued to turn against them.
Since then, they’ve cast the die again, this time in terms of their messaging in the run-up to the trial.
Because Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell refused to hold the Senate trial that Democrats would have preferred — which is to say, messy and protracted, with privileges and protections afforded to Democrats in the Senate that Democrats would have never dreamed of extending to Republicans in the House — Pelosi decided to sit on the articles and only handed them to the Senate last Wednesday.
Even then, the Democrats made sure to let America know how solemn and somber an occasion the delivery of the articles was — I mean, if you discount the signing ceremony with those nifty pens.

[Phil B.]

A new report on Tuesday night alleges that House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff (D-CA) appears to have “mischaracterized” evidence that was used in House Democrats’ impeachment investigation.The problem stems from a letter that Schiff sent to House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-NY) last week that summarizes “a trove of evidence from Lev Parnas, an indicted former associate of Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani,” Politico reported. “In one section of the letter, Schiff claims that Parnas ‘continued to try to arrange a meeting with President Zelensky,’ citing a specific text message exchange where Parnas tells Giuliani: ‘trying to get us mr Z.’ The remainder of the exchange — which was attached to Schiff’s letter — was redacted.”
Politico added, “But an unredacted version of the exchange shows that several days later, Parnas sent Giuliani a word document that appears to show notes from an interview with Mykola Zlochevsky, the founder of Burisma, followed by a text message to Giuliani that states: ‘mr Z answers my brother.’ That suggests Parnas was referring to Zlochevsky not Zelensky.”


“mischaracterized” is another way to say "LIED"

New Documents Show Democrat Adam Schiff Mischaracterized Evidence In Impeachment, Report Suggests | The Daily Wire

[Phil B.]

Ep. 1164 Adam Schiff Gets Busted Again! | Dan Bongino