To have ANY sort of statistical record ( just like in climate reporting) you have to work with more than ONE president's time in office, otherwise how can you argue points on: wage rate changes.. Gov't revenue.. people employed or unempoyed. So your arguement " he's not in office" doesn't pass the stink test, especially since ANYTHING that -=O=- CONTINUOUSLY used #43 for a scapegoat went bad for him! You can't change the games rules that have been used to gather stats for decades. I mean any sane person ( you can't shirk your past statements) can see that your ideals on that are just plain stupid and absurd.
TRUMPPENCE2020
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
Bookmarks