TRUMP/PUTIN2020
Stone’s attorneys keyed in on Jackson’s apparent defense of the allegedly biased juror in a motion to disqualify the judge from the case.
“Stone’s Motion for New Trial is directly related to the integrity of a juror,” the attorneys argued, according to The Hill. “It is alleged that a juror misled the Court regarding her ability to be unbiased and fair and the juror attempted to cover up evidence that would directly contradict her false claims of impartiality.”
The juror in question is a liberal activist named Tomeka Hart, who, according to The Hill, wasn’t afraid to make her dislike of the president and his associate known publicly.
Hart confirmed in a social media post that she was the foreperson on the jury in Stone’s trial and went on to defend the four prosecutors who quit Stone’s case after the Justice Department overruled their initial recommendation of up to nine years in prison for Stone, a 67-year-old man with no prior convictions.
Roger Stone asks for new trial | TheHill
Their course is great, but I find it more important is to have a .pdf copy of the Constitution with all the Amendments available on my computer. It is almost weekly that I have to correct someone on Facebook about what is in the Constitution. When I do I include what is actually written in the Constitution.
Bookmarks