Jip they could very well be dumb enough to do that.
They will get hurt for you protecting your property and that will only motivate more anti-gun law...
Look at that Kyle Rittenhouse, the dumb f#%^s feel so entitled in there destruction that they think they are bullet proof.
I could not believe that a guy thinks its a good idea to threaten and swing a skateboard at a guy on the ground with a rifle!
Lucky he was armed or he would have taken a bullet for sure. He covered his ass.
Then there is Canada and New-Zealand that throws up false flags in planed events to change the law.
Last edited by allan; 11-02-2020 at 05:43 AM.
Whatever
According to a study Trump rallies do spread the virus:
we conclude that these eighteen rallies ultimately resulted in more than 30,000 incremental confirmed cases of COVID-19.
The Effects of Large Group Meetings on the Spread of COVID-19: The Case of Trump Rallies | SIEPR
Got anything to back up your claims?
This was all I could find on BLM.
Also, BLM isn't the democratic party. Blaming me personally for made up stuff BLM did is the 3rd grader tactic.
In that Study they use the words......"Likely"......"Possible"......."Predict "....."Estimate" A LOT!! So in other words, they are just guessing. They don't actually have any solid data to back anything up.
They also say they "depend on models" (which we all know can't be "depended on"......remember the models that said 2 MILLION Americans would die from Covid by October of this year ???).
They also say they "depended on wikipedia data" (HAHAHAHAHA!!! Because we all know Wikipedia is Super Credible!!)
They also refuse to acknowledge that other areas of the country that didn't have a Trump Rally saw an increase in cases, so I'm not thinking it's the Rallies.
Omertà
How reckless of them to use Wiki for this info:
"We obtain a list of general election Trump rallies via a regularly-updated Wikipedia list based on local and national news reports."
The words likely, possible and estimate appear in many studies. It doesn't invalidate their research.
"A possible issue is that the same death rate might not apply to baseline cases and incrementalcases."
"Second, the effects of rallies are likely heterogeneous"
"First, these counties consistentlyyield among the highest discrepancies between predicted and actual cases, and consequently make important contributions to our estimated average treatment effects."
People who understand context don't need to use scare quotes around words or draw erroneous conclusions. As far as solid data, they didn't guess or estimate the number of cases. They took the number of known new cases and lined it up known events. If that isn't how you would go about finding out of BLM protests caused spikes I'd like to know how you would go about it.
They found cases spiked in Wisconsin and used that pattern to extrapolate rallies everywhere else. If you want to be childish and be hyper critical about the extrapolation, whatever. However, the original charge was Trump rallies did not spread covid. The data shows Trump rallies spikes cases of covid in Wisconsin.
It's as if some people can't process information unless it's spoon feed to them by the news.
Bookmarks