Thanks: 
Likes: Originally Posted by FrohnB
Sounds promising for the elderly who can't fight it on their own.
Dislikes: 0
Sounds promising for the elderly who can't fight it on their own.
and the MSM are still talking it down... even tho it has produced GREAT results in other parts of the world.
[QUOTE=Phil B.;1431116]and the MSM are still talking it down... even tho it has produced GREAT results in other parts of the world.
There is an Edmonton company working on a DNA cure for Covid. This could potentially provide cures for all corona viruses.
Edmonton company Entos developing DNA vaccine against COVID-19
[QUOTE=copier addict;1431176]There are lots of companies working "a cure" for COVID-19. Right now the only effective treatment for severe cases is hydroxychloroquine in conjunction with zinc.and the MSM are still talking it down... even tho it has produced GREAT results in other parts of the world.
There is an Edmonton company working on a DNA cure for Covid. This could potentially provide cures for all corona viruses.
Edmonton company Entos developing DNA vaccine against COVID-19
Save lives now instead of waiting for something that may not work.
skynet have you heard anything on this? I got it from a Facebook by debs1964.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/uk-en...istol-52173794
[QUOTE=slimslob;1431188]if I remember correctly... there is a 3rd compound in that mix.. Z-Pak for bronchitis symptoms
Publisher: Study Touting Hydroxychloroquine as COVID-19 Cure Doesn’t Meet ‘Standard’
The International Society of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy now says the hydroxychloroquine work by France’s Didier Raoult failed to meet its “expected standard.”
A study that touted the anti-malaria drug hydroxychloroquine as an effective treatment for the novel coronavirus has drawn new concern from the group that publishes the journal in which the work first appeared.
In a statement last week, the International Society of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (ISAC) said the study in question did not meet its standard— but did not go into many details as to why.
“ISAC shares the concerns regarding the above article published recently in the International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents (IJAA). The ISAC Board believes the article does not meet the Society’s expected standard, especially relating to the lack of better explanations of the inclusion criteria and the triage of patients to ensure patient safety,” the notice read. The notice was first reported by Retraction Watch.
ISAC’s notice acknowledged some criticisms of the study posted online regarding its potentially rushed peer-review. However, the society said the study’s process did “adhere to the industry’s peer-review rules.”
The study, led by the University of Marseille’s Didier Raoult, concluded that hydroxychloroquine treatment was “significantly associated” in reducing and eliminating the virus in COVID-19 patients. The addition of azithromycin to the treatment led to it being “significantly more efficient for virus elimination.”
The study reported testing 36 French COVID-19 patients in March, with the majority of them showing upper respiratory tract infection symptoms. They received 600mg of hydroxychloroquine daily, and were tested every day via nasal swabs. The addition of azithromycin to the treatment depended on patients’ “clinical presentation.”
President Trump has publicly touted hydroxychloroquine as a potential cure for COVID-19, telling reporters Sunday that the drug was “great” and there were “signs that it works on this, some very strong signs.” He’s also called for the Indian prime minister to release more of the drug to the U.S. just as the country placed a ban on the export of the drug.
According to CNN, the president also lauded the azithromycin addition to the hydroxychloroquine treatment, claiming azithromycin would “kill certain things that you don’t want living within your body.”
Trump started publicly mentioning hydroxychloroquine after Fox News guests and hosts began mentioning it on-air last month. On March 16, a guest on The Ingraham Angle specifically mentioned Raoult’s study days before it published.
“Within a matter of six days, the patients taking hydroxychloroquine tested negative for coronavirus, COVID-19,” Gregory Rigano—identified as a co-author of a study on chloroquine—told host Laura Ingraham. “This is a well-controlled study.”
Mehmet Oz, the TV doctor who has been advising Trump administration officials on coronavirus-related issues, also has publicly praised the study on Fox–calling Raoult a “well-respected French physician who’s done a lot of this work” and stating that the study’s “statistical significance” needed to be taken seriously.
“If it takes me 30,000 patients to show a difference, is that better than showing a difference in 62 patients? If a small trial demonstrates statistically significant differences, you should respect it,” Oz told host Brian Kilmede on Monday. “At least pay attention to it.”
To be honest I hadn't even heard of him.
When you think you have made a procedure idiot proof your company employs a better idiot.
Bath is district is where debs lived/lives. Gravesend to be exact. Her son Joe was a Labor Party counselor in Bath a few years ago.
Wow, a Daily Beast article? Really? Now you're just showing off how liberal and brain-dead you are!
Are you really that fuckin deranged that when someone puts up positive information (that is globally agreed upon), you have to "nay-say" it by posting some misleading bullshit like this!?!?
Is it because people are agreeing with Our President about something he's been touting for a while??? Does that just Piss you Off, that someone could agree with him??
Are you trying to confuse people by posting a HUGE and VERY MISLEADING HEADLINE about a serious Virus!!??
The ARTICLE that was written in this certain magazine didn't meet the MAGAZINE'S "STANDARD".
“ISAC shares the concerns regarding the above article published recently in the International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents (IJAA). The ISAC Board believes the article does not meet the Society’s expected standard, especially relating to the lack of better explanations of the inclusion criteria and the triage of patients to ensure patient safety,” Simply put....there was information missing in the article and they don't like it.
They are NOT saying that using Hydroxychloroquine for Covid didn't meet a certain standard (the global community is in agreement that CHLOROQUINE with ZINC is THE BEST TREATMENT OUT THERE).
What's wrong with you?
Omertà
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks