1. #7651
    Service Manager 10,000+ Posts
    The Shining City Upon a Hill

    Phil B.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Raleigh NC
    Posts
    22,790
    Rep Power
    661

    Re: The Shining City Upon a Hill

    Quote Originally Posted by bsm2 View Post
    Dude the guy CAN'T read the daily brief they to dumb it down with pictures. Thank god Twitter ban his ASS

    More excuses for a failure
    Another lie.
    1) daily briefings have pictures but of security installations.

    Not the crayon pictures you draw.

    Obama didn't even take every daily briefings.

    At the time he had bigger ' fish to fry '.
    He handled many corporations at one time in real life.

    How many jobs ( not corporations ) can you handle at one time.

    Hell you can't spell and make sense in your posts, doubt you could handle cleaning the restrooms @ Trump Tower.

    Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

  2. #7652
    IT Manager 10,000+ Posts bsm2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Biden 2024
    Posts
    26,011
    Rep Power
    336

    Re: The Shining City Upon a Hill

    Quote Originally Posted by Phil B. View Post
    Another lie.
    1) daily briefings have pictures but of security installations.

    Not the crayon pictures you draw.

    Obama didn't even take every daily briefings.

    At the time he had bigger ' fish to fry '.
    He handled many corporations at one time in real life.

    How many jobs ( not corporations ) can you handle at one time.

    Hell you can't spell and make sense in your posts, doubt you could handle cleaning the restrooms @ Trump Tower.

    Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
    More excuses as ALWAYS

  3. #7653
    Aging Tech 10,000+ Posts
    The Shining City Upon a Hill

    copier addict's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Diamond
    Posts
    12,004
    Rep Power
    325

    Re: The Shining City Upon a Hill

    Quote Originally Posted by Phil B. View Post
    Another lie.
    1) daily briefings have pictures but of security installations.

    Not the crayon pictures you draw.

    Obama didn't even take every daily briefings.

    At the time he had bigger ' fish to fry '.
    He handled many corporations at one time in real life.

    How many jobs ( not corporations ) can you handle at one time.

    Hell you can't spell and make sense in your posts, doubt you could handle cleaning the restrooms @ Trump Tower.

    Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
    Yup, he handled many corporations into bankruptcy. You really shouldn't be bragging about this Phil

  4. #7654
    Retired 10,000+ Posts
    The Shining City Upon a Hill

    slimslob's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Bakersfield, CA
    Posts
    34,239
    Rep Power
    992

  5. #7655
    Service Manager 5,000+ Posts
    The Shining City Upon a Hill

    SalesServiceGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Nova Scotia
    Posts
    7,731
    Rep Power
    225

    Re: The Shining City Upon a Hill

    Biden Apologizes to Peter Doocy But Hot Mic Gaffe Makes it into White House Transcript


    President Joe Biden apologized after calling Fox News reporter Peter Doocy a "stupid son of a b****" on a hot microphone during a meeting about inflation.

    Biden met with administration officials Monday afternoon to discuss solutions to deal with the high inflation many in the United States continue to grapple with. Reporters were allowed in the room for the meeting, and several lobbed questions to Biden at the end of it.

    Doocy pressed Biden on whether or not he believes inflation will be a "political liability in the midterms."

    "It's a great asset—more inflation. What a stupid son of a b****," Biden sarcastically quipped, not appearing to intend for the remark to be heard by others.

    Biden later called Doocy the same day to apologize for the remark, according to CNN reporter Kaitlan Collins. Doocy later told Fox News host Sean Hannity that Biden called to tell him, "It's nothing personal, pal."


    ... the kind of thing an adult would do when he realized that he made a mistake.

    ... the kind of thing the ex President never, ever did other than to double down ever more rudely on any follow up comments.


  6. #7656
    Service Manager 10,000+ Posts
    The Shining City Upon a Hill

    BillyCarpenter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Location
    Long Beach, Mississippi
    Posts
    13,454
    Rep Power
    449

    Re: The Shining City Upon a Hill

    Quote Originally Posted by SalesServiceGuy View Post
    Biden Apologizes to Peter Doocy But Hot Mic Gaffe Makes it into White House Transcript


    President Joe Biden apologized after calling Fox News reporter Peter Doocy a "stupid son of a b****" on a hot microphone during a meeting about inflation.

    Biden met with administration officials Monday afternoon to discuss solutions to deal with the high inflation many in the United States continue to grapple with. Reporters were allowed in the room for the meeting, and several lobbed questions to Biden at the end of it.

    Doocy pressed Biden on whether or not he believes inflation will be a "political liability in the midterms."

    "It's a great asset—more inflation. What a stupid son of a b****," Biden sarcastically quipped, not appearing to intend for the remark to be heard by others.

    Biden later called Doocy the same day to apologize for the remark, according to CNN reporter Kaitlan Collins. Doocy later told Fox News host Sean Hannity that Biden called to tell him, "It's nothing personal, pal."


    ... the kind of thing an adult would do when he realized that he made a mistake.

    ... the kind of thing the ex President never, ever did other than to double down ever more rudely on any follow up comments.

    I think everyone understands that your posts aren't to be taken seriously. Nothing you say is based in reality.



    Harvard-Harris Poll Points to Political Realignment Against Extremist Democrats

    Harvard-Harris was one of the last reputable pollsters giving His Fraudulency Joe Biden a mid-40s approval rating. In their previous poll from early January, Biden sat at 45 percent approval with 51 percent disapproving. But their latest polling not only shows Biden’s job approval rating upside-down at 39 percent approve and 53 percent disapprove; the internals point to what I’ve been talking about for months — a political realignment.


    Democrats are not just staring down the face of a Red Wave in the upcoming November midterms. They are facing a generational shift against the lunacy and abject failure of their own extremism.



    It’s bad enough Democrat policies have delivered record inflation, open borders, and record COVID infections and hospitalizations, along with a spike in violent crime unseen since the 1970s…. But Democrats — along with their allies in the corporate media, Hollywood, Big Business, and Big Tech — have spent the last few years trying to violate human nature.


    While Americans suffer through brutal gas prices, empty store shelves, anti-science COVID restrictions, and the overall unease brought on by all of this, Democrats, in a million different ways, have shown they do not give a damn about everyday Americans. Instead, the Democrats are solely focused on comforting illegal aliens, violent criminals, violent rioters, the radical extremists who want pro-racist propaganda and gay porn as part of school curriculum, and biological men who claim to be women so they can erase pretty much every accomplishment — from Jeopardy! to swimming — held by an actual woman.


    I know many people are demoralized by these developments, but no matter how much the corporate media and social media attempt to gaslight Americans into thinking differently, this madness will not stand. A backlash that will realign politics for a generation is not only brewing; it has already begun. In 2021, Democrats lost in deep-blue New Jersey, were wiped out in deep blue Virginia, and a Republican city attorney beat the Democrat in crazy-blue Seattle.


    I’m sorry, but you cannot pervert human nature, you cannot pervert people’s children, you cannot abuse people’s children, and remain a dominant political party. You just can’t.


    Below are the numbers in the Harvard-Harris poll that show what’s already happening… A realignment to the political right is coming, and not for a single election season. Until the Democrats become sane again, which will be very difficult with an insane base, this is how the country will look…


    BIDEN APPROVE – DISAPPROVE

    • Economy: 35-58
    • Foreign policy: 35-54
    • Stimulating jobs: 41-51
    • Immigration: 34-57
    • Handling coronavirus: 44-50
    • Handling violence and crime: 36-55
    • Inflation: 31-61
    • Only 47 percent believe Biden is mentally fit.
    • A full 61 percent believe he’s too old.



    This next one is stunning…


    Approve/Disapprove of Republican party: 48-52 or -4


    Approve/Disapprove of Democrat party: 40-60 or -20


    By a margin of 39-27 percent, respondents said the pandemic is getting worse.

    Only 16 percent said they would vote for Joe Biden in the 2024 Democrat primary. That’s not a typo —An astonishing 84 percent would choose someone else.


    Here are some favorability/unfavorable ratings:


    Donald Trump: 47 – 44 percent
    Fox News: 46 – 37 percent
    Black Lives Matter: 42 – 44 percent
    CNNLOL: 41 – 42 percent
    Joe Biden: 39 percent – 53 percent
    Kamala Harris: 36 – 51 percent
    Hillary: 35 – 53 percent
    Nancy Pelosi: 32 – 54 percent
    When asked, “Who do you think has been a better president,” Trump beats Biden 53 to 47 percent.


    When asked, “If the 2024 election for President were held today…” Trump beats Biden 46 to 40 percent.


    When asked, “If the 2024 election for President were held today…” Trump beats Kamala Harris 49 to 39 percent.


    In the generic congressional poll, the GOP beats the Democrats 53 to 47 percent.


    Until the Democrats regain their sanity, this is their future. Even with billions and billions of corporate media and tech dollars propagandizing for them, this is their future.














    Growth is found only in adversity.

  7. #7657
    Retired 10,000+ Posts
    The Shining City Upon a Hill

    slimslob's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Bakersfield, CA
    Posts
    34,239
    Rep Power
    992

    Re: The Shining City Upon a Hill


  8. #7658
    Service Manager 5,000+ Posts
    The Shining City Upon a Hill

    SalesServiceGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Nova Scotia
    Posts
    7,731
    Rep Power
    225

    Re: The Shining City Upon a Hill

    This Silicon Valley city is poised to take a step closer to first-in-the-nation gun ownership requirements


    San Jose, California, is getting closer to adopting a first-in-the-nation law to address gun violence by requiring all gun owners to pay a fee and carry liability insurance.

    The Silicon Valley city's council is due to vote Tuesday on the ordinance, whose dual-pronged approach aims to reduce the risk of gun harm by incentivizing safer behavior and to ease taxpayers of the financial burden of gun violence.

    "Certainly the Second Amendment protects every citizen's right to own a gun. It does not require taxpayers to subsidize that right,"

    Democratic Mayor Sam Liccardo said Monday at a news conference, estimating that San Jose residents incur about $442 million in gun-related costs each year.

    Mass shootings have impelled Liccardo to push the fee and insurance measures -- first after the 2019 slayings at a festival in nearby Gilroy, California, then following last year's deadly siege at public transit facility in his city. The mayor has compared the plan to car insurance mandates, which he credits with dramatically reducing traffic fatalities.

    San Jose city council after the June mass shooting unanimously approved drafting the ordinance, mayoral spokesperson Rachel Davis said Monday in a news release. If it's approved Tuesday and on second reading February 8, it would take effect August 8.

    Just 52% of Americans polled in late 2021 said "laws covering the sales of firearms" should be stricter, the lowest number Gallup has measured on the question since 2014. Meanwhile, there is a direct correlation in states with weaker gun laws and higher rates of gun deaths, including homicides, suicides and accidental killings, a study released Thursday by Everytown for Gun Safety found.

    Under San Jose's proposed law, gun owners would be charged an annual $25 fee directed to a nonprofit set up to distribute funds to gun crime prevention and to victims of gun violence. The measure also would require gun owners to obtain liability insurance that would cover damage caused by their weapon.

    Lower premiums for those with gun safes, trigger locks and completed gun safety classes are expected to incentivize safer behavior.

    As to enforcement, police officers crossing paths with gun owners would ask for proof of insurance, much like they do with car insurance during traffic stops, Liccardo explained.

    While some would be exempt, including those in law enforcement and with concealed carry permits, pushback is expected, the mayor acknowledged.

    "We've opposed this ordinance every step of the way and we will see this through to the end," Dudley Brown, president of the National Association for Gun Rights and executive director of the National Foundation for Gun Rights.

    The City has identified a law firm that would represent it on the issue at no charge, the mayor's spokesperson said.



  9. #7659
    Service Manager 10,000+ Posts
    The Shining City Upon a Hill

    BillyCarpenter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Location
    Long Beach, Mississippi
    Posts
    13,454
    Rep Power
    449

    Re: The Shining City Upon a Hill

    Quote Originally Posted by SalesServiceGuy View Post
    This Silicon Valley city is poised to take a step closer to first-in-the-nation gun ownership requirements


    San Jose, California, is getting closer to adopting a first-in-the-nation law to address gun violence by requiring all gun owners to pay a fee and carry liability insurance.

    The Silicon Valley city's council is due to vote Tuesday on the ordinance, whose dual-pronged approach aims to reduce the risk of gun harm by incentivizing safer behavior and to ease taxpayers of the financial burden of gun violence.

    "Certainly the Second Amendment protects every citizen's right to own a gun. It does not require taxpayers to subsidize that right,"

    Democratic Mayor Sam Liccardo said Monday at a news conference, estimating that San Jose residents incur about $442 million in gun-related costs each year.

    Mass shootings have impelled Liccardo to push the fee and insurance measures -- first after the 2019 slayings at a festival in nearby Gilroy, California, then following last year's deadly siege at public transit facility in his city. The mayor has compared the plan to car insurance mandates, which he credits with dramatically reducing traffic fatalities.

    San Jose city council after the June mass shooting unanimously approved drafting the ordinance, mayoral spokesperson Rachel Davis said Monday in a news release. If it's approved Tuesday and on second reading February 8, it would take effect August 8.

    Just 52% of Americans polled in late 2021 said "laws covering the sales of firearms" should be stricter, the lowest number Gallup has measured on the question since 2014. Meanwhile, there is a direct correlation in states with weaker gun laws and higher rates of gun deaths, including homicides, suicides and accidental killings, a study released Thursday by Everytown for Gun Safety found.

    Under San Jose's proposed law, gun owners would be charged an annual $25 fee directed to a nonprofit set up to distribute funds to gun crime prevention and to victims of gun violence. The measure also would require gun owners to obtain liability insurance that would cover damage caused by their weapon.

    Lower premiums for those with gun safes, trigger locks and completed gun safety classes are expected to incentivize safer behavior.

    As to enforcement, police officers crossing paths with gun owners would ask for proof of insurance, much like they do with car insurance during traffic stops, Liccardo explained.

    While some would be exempt, including those in law enforcement and with concealed carry permits, pushback is expected, the mayor acknowledged.

    "We've opposed this ordinance every step of the way and we will see this through to the end," Dudley Brown, president of the National Association for Gun Rights and executive director of the National Foundation for Gun Rights.

    The City has identified a law firm that would represent it on the issue at no charge, the mayor's spokesperson said.




    I say this as a person who has never owned a gun in my entire life. Democrats say that don't want to take your guns. They lie. They want to confiscate every gun in the country.

    This law will be fast tracked to the supreme court and quickly shot down. But don't relax. They want your guns and they want you to be powerless against their bullshit.
    Last edited by BillyCarpenter; 01-25-2022 at 10:46 PM.
    Growth is found only in adversity.

  10. #7660
    Aging Tech 10,000+ Posts
    The Shining City Upon a Hill

    copier addict's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Diamond
    Posts
    12,004
    Rep Power
    325

    Re: The Shining City Upon a Hill

    Anyone who believes any political party wants to take everybodies guns is not very bright. Anyone who associates gun control with taking away everybodies guns is not very bright.
    Just sayin"
    No offence to anyone.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Get the Android App
click or scan for the Copytechnet Mobile App

-= -= -= -= -=


IDrive Remote Backup

Lunarpages Internet Solutions

Advertise on Copytechnet

Your Link Here