The Shining City Upon a Hill

**copier addict** · 01-26-2022

Originally Posted by slimslob

It does show that you have very little brains. This is part of what you posted that I was replying to. "Anyone who believes any political party wants to take everybody's guns is not very bright." I was just showing you that major Democrats politicians have said that they are coming for our guns. Since they have actually said it, it is a fact, no believing needed. Those like you who think otherwise are the ones who are not very bright.

Until you have spent a few decades living in America and listening to Democrat politicians saying the same things every campaign, you really should not attempt to comment on what has been said. It makes you look like an even bigger idiot than you actually are.

Now go away and date your trans.

He said if you hurt people. Grow up. Your constant need to insult people, a right wing trait, kinda shows your level of intelligence.

**bsm2** · 01-26-2022

**SalesServiceGuy** · 01-26-2022

The San Jose, California, city council voted Tuesday night to adopt a first-in-the-nation ordinance requiring most gun owners to pay a fee and carry liability insurance, measures aimed at reducing the risk of gun harm by incentivizing safer behavior and easing taxpayers of the financial burden of gun violence.

The Silicon Valley city's council split the vote into two parts: the first approving the bulk of the proposal, including the insurance provisions, and the second approving the fee provisions. The insurance vote passed 10-1, while the fees vote passed 8-3.

The ordinance must be approved next month at its final reading in order to take effect in August. Gun rights supporters have threatened to sue to block the measures if they become law.

Ahead of the vote, Democratic Mayor Sam Liccardo estimated that San Jose residents incur about $442 million in gun-related costs each year. "Certainly the Second Amendment protects every citizen's right to own a gun. It does not require taxpayers to subsidize that right," Liccardo said Monday at a news conference.

... citizens who comply with this proposed law have no fear that the City is coming to take away their guns. That is not the point of the proposed law. The point is to recover some of the estimated $442M it costs the City every year in dealing with the consequences of gun ownership.

... I can only guess that people who visit the City with firearms and are not residents have only to obey State and Federal laws.

**BillyCarpenter** · 01-26-2022

Originally Posted by SalesServiceGuy

The San Jose, California, city council voted Tuesday night to adopt a first-in-the-nation ordinance requiring most gun owners to pay a fee and carry liability insurance, measures aimed at reducing the risk of gun harm by incentivizing safer behavior and easing taxpayers of the financial burden of gun violence.

The Silicon Valley city's council split the vote into two parts: the first approving the bulk of the proposal, including the insurance provisions, and the second approving the fee provisions. The insurance vote passed 10-1, while the fees vote passed 8-3.

The ordinance must be approved next month at its final reading in order to take effect in August. Gun rights supporters have threatened to sue to block the measures if they become law.

Ahead of the vote, Democratic Mayor Sam Liccardo estimated that San Jose residents incur about $442 million in gun-related costs each year. "Certainly the Second Amendment protects every citizen's right to own a gun. It does not require taxpayers to subsidize that right," Liccardo said Monday at a news conference.

... citizens who comply with this proposed law have no fear that the City is coming to take away their guns. That is not the point of the proposed law. The point is to recover some of the estimated $442M it costs the City every year in dealing with the consequences of gun ownership.

... I can only guess that people who visit the City with firearms and are not residents have only to obey State and Federal laws.

I see the dems are up to their old tricks again. If they can't outright ban all firearms, they'll tax it to the point to where no one can afford to own one. Then they'll use that tax money to subsidize abortions.

**bsm2** · 01-26-2022

Originally Posted by BillyCarpenter

I see the dems are up to their old tricks again. If they can't outright ban all firearms, they'll tax it to the point to where no one can afford to own one. Then they'll use that tax money to subsidize abortions.

Great

Thanks for your support

**bsm2** · 01-26-2022

No, it's a great asset," Biden said sarcastically into a microphone. "More inflation. What a stupid son of a bitch."

**BillyCarpenter** · 01-26-2022

Originally Posted by bsm2

No, it's a great asset," Biden said sarcastically into a microphone. "More inflation. What a stupid son of a bitch."

Biden doesn't want to answer any questions on inflation because the democrats are all out of lies.

First they lied and said inflation was temporary. The next lie was that inflation only hurts the rich.

There's nothing left to say except to admit that Biden is in over his head.