Ricoh 2051 vs 2060 vs 2075

**m_donakov** · 04-03-2021

Hello everyone

to ask you for your opinion. If you could choose between 2051, 2060 and 2075 what would you choose? They are 100% Identical in parts and boards except the speed, I heard someone think that if it is slower it gets stuck less. What do you think?

**copier tech** · 04-03-2021

Originally Posted by m_donakov

Hello everyone

to ask you for your opinion. If you could choose between 2051, 2060 and 2075 what would you choose? They are 100% Identical in parts and boards except the speed, I heard someone think that if it is slower it gets stuck less. What do you think?

All 3 very old models but if I had to choose if would be the C2051 or C2251 if you have a choice. This was a good solid reliable model no real major issues.

As for the 2060/2070 these had a few issues but I didn;t seell many hopefully one of the other members can give you more info.

However what is you budget? the MP C3003 series were a much better model & cost peanuts to purchase now.

**m_donakov** · 04-03-2021

no budget problem, i have mp9002 and mp7500 as main machines. One of these 2060 or 2075 I can get very cheap 100 euros. So I do not want to miss the chance to have a third machine as a backup.

**slimslob** · 04-03-2021

The three are basically the same other than pages per minute and as such the target monthly volume. Since you already have a 7500, I would recommend the 2075. I would avoid the 2051. The difference in ppm is not due to a difference in motor speed. It is due to feed timing., i.e. the gap between sheets of paper in a multi copy run. This increases the time the PCU and DVU are spinning with no paper passing through which ultimately increases wear.

**m_donakov** · 04-04-2021

Originally Posted by slimslob

The three are basically the same other than pages per minute and as such the target monthly volume. Since you already have a 7500, I would recommend the 2075. I would avoid the 2051. The difference in ppm is not due to a difference in motor speed. It is due to feed timing., i.e. the gap between sheets of paper in a multi copy run. This increases the time the PCU and DVU are spinning with no paper passing through which ultimately increases wear.

Thanks for the information, so far no one has explained to me what the difference is between slower and faster machines of the same generation. So still faster machines are better, Thanks

**copier tech** · 04-04-2021

Originally Posted by m_donakov

no budget problem, i have mp9002 and mp7500 as main machines. One of these 2060 or 2075 I can get very cheap 100 euros. So I do not want to miss the chance to have a third machine as a backup.

I was thinking of the C20501, now I understand you're talking about the 2051/2060/2075 mono series.

If your budget is not an issue I would suggest looking into the later Ricoh mono series.

**mga** · 04-04-2021

Originally Posted by m_donakov

Hello everyone

to ask you for your opinion. If you could choose between 2051, 2060 and 2075 what would you choose? They are 100% Identical in parts and boards except the speed, I heard someone think that if it is slower it gets stuck less. What do you think?

Great machine one of the best or the best machine made by ricoh speed doesn't made a difference about jamming if the machine jams there a problem get the 75 ppm

**rthonpm** · 04-05-2021

The 2075 was a good machine for its time, but if you're looking for something to be a reliable emergency machine I'd look for something newer. The 20 series machines are well over a decade old and even when new there were always more problems with machines that ran low volume than there were with the boxes that ran well over the recommended volume.

Sent from my BlackBerry using Tapatalk

**bob marley** · 04-05-2021

Originally Posted by rthonpm

The 2075 was a good machine for its time, but if you're looking for something to be a reliable emergency machine I'd look for something newer. The 20 series machines are well over a decade old and even when new there were always more problems with machines that ran low volume than there were with the boxes that ran well over the recommended volume.

Sent from my BlackBerry using Tapatalk

I agree with u

**m_donakov** · 04-06-2021

Originally Posted by slimslob

The three are basically the same other than pages per minute and as such the target monthly volume. Since you already have a 7500, I would recommend the 2075. I would avoid the 2051. The difference in ppm is not due to a difference in motor speed. It is due to feed timing., i.e. the gap between sheets of paper in a multi copy run. This increases the time the PCU and DVU are spinning with no paper passing through which ultimately increases wear.

Can you tell me the power supply borad It is same on 1075 and 2051/2060?

Thanks a lot