-
-
Re: The Shining City Upon a Hill
Other recipients in Florida include Democratic representatives Kathy Castor, Stephanie Murphy and Val Demings, PUblix has also steered money to a diverse array of House members, including Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, D-Sunrise, a prominent liberal, and Rep. Darren Soto, D-Kissimmee.
In February 2019
They donated MILLIONS to Republicans.
Oh yeah......because the DeSantis thing is completely fuckin fabricated!
Wake Up Sheep!
OmertÃComment
-
Re: The Shining City Upon a Hill
Good News
Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Submits Plan to CDC. Asks for July 4 Restart
April 05, 2021
Norwegian Bliss in Seattle
Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings (NCLH) has sent a letter to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on Monday outlining its plan to resume cruise operations from U.S. ports in July that includes its multi-layered SailSAFE Health and Safety Program developed in conjunction with globally recognized experts, including the Healthy Sail Panel (HSP), according to a press release.
The company, which operates the Norwegian, Regent and Oceania brands, has asked for permission to cruise starting on July 4 from U.S. ports with vessels at 60 percent capacity; all guests and crew will require to be vaccinated.Comment
-
Re: The Shining City Upon a Hill
Biden's energy secretary doesn't deny tax hikes to pay for massive infrastructure plan will 'hit the middle class hard'
Oh, good
Secretary of Energy Jennifer Granholm didn't deny claims over the weekend that tax hikes associated with the Biden administration's more than $2 trillion infrastructure plan could have a ruinous economic effect on middle-class Americans.
During an interview on Sunday, CNN host Jake Tapper confronted the energy secretary on the issue, citing concerns among Republicans and moderate congressional Democrats about the economic impact of raising taxes.
In the lead-up to his question, Tapper specifically referred to a recent Wall Street Journal editoriallaundry list of progressive political prioritieslargest tax hike in almost three decades. One of the major changes getting media attention is a proposed increase of the corporate tax rate from 21% to 28%.
In response, Granholm remarkably didn't raise an objection to the specific claim. Rather, she dodged the question by claiming the administration's corporate tax rate figure is "fair" and a "reasonable middle."
"You recall that just a few years ago the tax rate for corporate taxes was 35%," Granholm said. "When Donald Trump passed his corporate and tax cuts for the wealthy package, he dropped it to a point that nobody was even asking for, which was 21%. So what Joe Biden is saying is, let's put it to a reasonable middle. Let's put us in line with other industrial nations, which is 28%."
The energy secretary then hit back at criticisms by saying, "If you don't like this, then come and tell us how you would pay for it."
"Of the polling that's been done out there on this, more people support paying for infrastructure rather than racking up deficits than not, and that includes Republicans," she argued. "People know that you can't just continue to spend without paying for it. And so what Joe Biden wants to do is to do it in a fair way."
Earlier in the interview, Granholm made it clear that the administration would be perfectly happy to move the legislation through Congress without a single Republican vote, much like Democrats did with Biden's $1.9 trillion coronavirus relief package. You can watch the full interview here:
During an interview on Sunday, CNN host Jake Tapper confronted the energy secretary on the issue, citing concerns among Republicans and moderate congressional Democrats about the economic impact of raising taxes.
In the lead-up to his question, Tapper specifically referred to a recent Wall Street Journal editoriallaundry list of progressive political prioritieslargest tax hike in almost three decades. One of the major changes getting media attention is a proposed increase of the corporate tax rate from 21% to 28%.
In response, Granholm remarkably didn't raise an objection to the specific claim. Rather, she dodged the question by claiming the administration's corporate tax rate figure is "fair" and a "reasonable middle."
"You recall that just a few years ago the tax rate for corporate taxes was 35%," Granholm said. "When Donald Trump passed his corporate and tax cuts for the wealthy package, he dropped it to a point that nobody was even asking for, which was 21%. So what Joe Biden is saying is, let's put it to a reasonable middle. Let's put us in line with other industrial nations, which is 28%."
The energy secretary then hit back at criticisms by saying, "If you don't like this, then come and tell us how you would pay for it."
"Of the polling that's been done out there on this, more people support paying for infrastructure rather than racking up deficits than not, and that includes Republicans," she argued. "People know that you can't just continue to spend without paying for it. And so what Joe Biden wants to do is to do it in a fair way."
Earlier in the interview, Granholm made it clear that the administration would be perfectly happy to move the legislation through Congress without a single Republican vote, much like Democrats did with Biden's $1.9 trillion coronavirus relief package. You can watch the full interview here:
Comment
-
Re: The Shining City Upon a Hill
Crowder: John Oliver's ABSURD national debt lies DEBUNKED
John Oliver thinks he can get away with lying about Donald Trump and the national debt. We won't let him! Also, Charles Barkley made a commonsense statement on race that pissed off liberal Twitter. Joe Biden was busted cheating during his press conference. And the truth about Pete Buttigieg and his bike. Watch here: l
louderwithcrowder.com/live
Comment
-
Re: The Shining City Upon a Hill
Hilarious double post PhilBiden's energy secretary doesn't deny tax hikes to pay for massive infrastructure plan will 'hit the middle class hard'
Oh, good
Secretary of Energy Jennifer Granholm didn't deny claims over the weekend that tax hikes associated with the Biden administration's more than $2 trillion infrastructure plan could have a ruinous economic effect on middle-class Americans.
During an interview on Sunday, CNN host Jake Tapper confronted the energy secretary on the issue, citing concerns among Republicans and moderate congressional Democrats about the economic impact of raising taxes.
In the lead-up to his question, Tapper specifically referred to a recent Wall Street Journal editoriallaundry list of progressive political prioritieslargest tax hike in almost three decades. One of the major changes getting media attention is a proposed increase of the corporate tax rate from 21% to 28%.
In response, Granholm remarkably didn't raise an objection to the specific claim. Rather, she dodged the question by claiming the administration's corporate tax rate figure is "fair" and a "reasonable middle."
"You recall that just a few years ago the tax rate for corporate taxes was 35%," Granholm said. "When Donald Trump passed his corporate and tax cuts for the wealthy package, he dropped it to a point that nobody was even asking for, which was 21%. So what Joe Biden is saying is, let's put it to a reasonable middle. Let's put us in line with other industrial nations, which is 28%."
The energy secretary then hit back at criticisms by saying, "If you don't like this, then come and tell us how you would pay for it."
"Of the polling that's been done out there on this, more people support paying for infrastructure rather than racking up deficits than not, and that includes Republicans," she argued. "People know that you can't just continue to spend without paying for it. And so what Joe Biden wants to do is to do it in a fair way."
Earlier in the interview, Granholm made it clear that the administration would be perfectly happy to move the legislation through Congress without a single Republican vote, much like Democrats did with Biden's $1.9 trillion coronavirus relief package. You can watch the full interview here:
During an interview on Sunday, CNN host Jake Tapper confronted the energy secretary on the issue, citing concerns among Republicans and moderate congressional Democrats about the economic impact of raising taxes.
In the lead-up to his question, Tapper specifically referred to a recent Wall Street Journal editoriallaundry list of progressive political prioritieslargest tax hike in almost three decades. One of the major changes getting media attention is a proposed increase of the corporate tax rate from 21% to 28%.
In response, Granholm remarkably didn't raise an objection to the specific claim. Rather, she dodged the question by claiming the administration's corporate tax rate figure is "fair" and a "reasonable middle."
"You recall that just a few years ago the tax rate for corporate taxes was 35%," Granholm said. "When Donald Trump passed his corporate and tax cuts for the wealthy package, he dropped it to a point that nobody was even asking for, which was 21%. So what Joe Biden is saying is, let's put it to a reasonable middle. Let's put us in line with other industrial nations, which is 28%."
The energy secretary then hit back at criticisms by saying, "If you don't like this, then come and tell us how you would pay for it."
"Of the polling that's been done out there on this, more people support paying for infrastructure rather than racking up deficits than not, and that includes Republicans," she argued. "People know that you can't just continue to spend without paying for it. And so what Joe Biden wants to do is to do it in a fair way."
Earlier in the interview, Granholm made it clear that the administration would be perfectly happy to move the legislation through Congress without a single Republican vote, much like Democrats did with Biden's $1.9 trillion coronavirus relief package. You can watch the full interview here:
https://youtu.be/m8NVZqAGL6w
Yep ZERO Yep ZERO tax increases on Middle-class
Try againComment
-
Re: The Shining City Upon a Hill
... so if you read what you posted you now understand that raising the Corporate tax rate from 21% to the global average of 28% to pay for proposed infrastructure improvements is very reasonable. No ruinous tax on the middle class is described.Biden's energy secretary doesn't deny tax hikes to pay for massive infrastructure plan will 'hit the middle class hard'
Oh, good
Secretary of Energy Jennifer Granholm didn't deny claims over the weekend that tax hikes associated with the Biden administration's more than $2 trillion infrastructure plan could have a ruinous economic effect on middle-class Americans.
During an interview on Sunday, CNN host Jake Tapper confronted the energy secretary on the issue, citing concerns among Republicans and moderate congressional Democrats about the economic impact of raising taxes.
In the lead-up to his question, Tapper specifically referred to a recent Wall Street Journal editoriallaundry list of progressive political prioritieslargest tax hike in almost three decades. One of the major changes getting media attention is a proposed increase of the corporate tax rate from 21% to 28%.
In response, Granholm remarkably didn't raise an objection to the specific claim. Rather, she dodged the question by claiming the administration's corporate tax rate figure is "fair" and a "reasonable middle."
"You recall that just a few years ago the tax rate for corporate taxes was 35%," Granholm said. "When Donald Trump passed his corporate and tax cuts for the wealthy package, he dropped it to a point that nobody was even asking for, which was 21%. So what Joe Biden is saying is, let's put it to a reasonable middle. Let's put us in line with other industrial nations, which is 28%."
The energy secretary then hit back at criticisms by saying, "If you don't like this, then come and tell us how you would pay for it."
"Of the polling that's been done out there on this, more people support paying for infrastructure rather than racking up deficits than not, and that includes Republicans," she argued. "People know that you can't just continue to spend without paying for it. And so what Joe Biden wants to do is to do it in a fair way."
Earlier in the interview, Granholm made it clear that the administration would be perfectly happy to move the legislation through Congress without a single Republican vote, much like Democrats did with Biden's $1.9 trillion coronavirus relief package. You can watch the full interview here:
During an interview on Sunday, CNN host Jake Tapper confronted the energy secretary on the issue, citing concerns among Republicans and moderate congressional Democrats about the economic impact of raising taxes.
In the lead-up to his question, Tapper specifically referred to a recent Wall Street Journal editoriallaundry list of progressive political prioritieslargest tax hike in almost three decades. One of the major changes getting media attention is a proposed increase of the corporate tax rate from 21% to 28%.
Comment
-
Re: The Shining City Upon a Hill
Reading is required buddy.
In the lead-up to his question, Tapper specifically referred to a recent Wall Street Journal editorialOmertÃComment
-
Re: The Shining City Upon a Hill
Dem. Rep: Bring American Jobs Back From China - and Put Them in Central America
FUCK THAT AMERICA FIRST.
border crisisgeopolitical and economic rivalsupply-chain safety.
, who has been named as a co-conspirator in a U.S. narco-trafficking trial. According to ABC Newsusing a rulingcampaign websiteLos Angeles Timescut through historically black neighborhoodsnational security threatour supply lines saferComment
-
Re: The Shining City Upon a Hill
The Meltdowns are going Well
Phil you keep posting in the wrong threads come on manComment
-
Re: The Shining City Upon a Hill
New batch of $1,400 stimulus checks includes 'plus-up' payments to those eligible for more money
PUBLISHED MON, APR 5 2021 9:41 AM EDT
Lorie Konish
@LORIEKONISH
SHARE
KEY POINTS
As the government continues to send $1,400 stimulus checks, some people are getting plus-up payments to the payments they already received.
People who receive Social Security, Supplemental Security Income or Railroad Retirement benefits could see their checks deposited in the coming days.Comment
-
Re: The Shining City Upon a Hill
You are wrong again. If you have a valid reason to be on permanent Absentee Ballot, you can vote as soon as you receive your Absentee Ballot.Comment
Comment