White Privilege, clear cut.

[bsm2]

Re: White Privilege, clear cut.

Are you serious, baby killer? What heat? What are you gonna do, kick my ass? The fact that you support killing a 9 month old unborn child makes you a low life motherfucker and your daughter should be ashamed of her low-life father. Does you daughter know your stance on abortion? I hope not.

Fortunately, what you support is illegal in most states.

It's illegal in all states Rookie
Man you learned alot today

[BillyCarpenter]

Re: White Privilege, clear cut.

It's illegal in all states Rookie
Man you learned alot today

Don't be taking up for your boy. I'm just getting warmed up.

[bsm2]

Re: White Privilege, clear cut.

Don't be taking up for your boy. I'm just getting warmed up.

Please don't bother you already look Riduilous

Please rest your brain

[BillyCarpenter]

Re: White Privilege, clear cut.

Please don't bother you already look Riduilous

Please rest you brain

Learn how to spell ridiculous, you ignorant fool.

[bsm2]

[bsm2]

Re: White Privilege, clear cut.

I like Riduilous suits u well

[slimslob]

Re: White Privilege, clear cut.

Weird, because you just did.
I agree that we should not be going back to the backroom abortion days.

I am not married, been with the same woman for 20 years. 14 years ago, when she did come to me and told me the very thing you posted, we decided to have a child. 14 years later I have an amazing and wonderful daughter whom I could not image my life without.

Just because I support another persons rights does not mean I live my life that way.

Btw, this you....?
Anything goes!" that is at the top of every page of the Rants, Raves, and Everything Else.

If he cant take the heat, tell your boy to get out the kitchen.

The way you are reacting to what Billy has been posting I would say that you are the one who cannot take the heat.

[Crowfeather]

Re: White Privilege, clear cut.

Support for one issue does not make you right or left, liberal or conservative. In one breath you say "think for yourself", then label those that do as "extreme". (see previous post about shooting yourself in the foot)

So using your own logic, as you don't believe in God, guns, etc..., that would make you a "liberal" would it not ? You don't think the election was stolen, another "liberal" belief. Shit you are more liberal than I am. !

The only thing "extreme" about you is your stupidity.

Just saw you post this gem:
No luck. Then I realized I never checked to see if SMB1 was turned on at the serverr. It wasn't. I turned it on and all worked as it should. I must be more careful.

Allowing SMBv1 on a server.....should be more careful is a HUGE understatement.

I am curious to know how high your parts spend is and what your call backs are like ? With "logic" such as yours, I bet they are through the roof.

SMB1 is no less secure than SMB2 or SMB3 They all have their own vulnerabilities. Fundamentally, cybersecurity for the most part comes down to how educated the end user is. As they are the weak point in a chain of defence against an attack. SMBv2 and the later SMBv3 are the same protocols, but with a few updates to offer better security where the end user has failed.

LMFAO...so it IS very high as I suspected.
SMB v1 on a server and posting this in public. I wouldn't count on many IT jobs heading your way
You aren't qualified to hold my lunch, and I don't even eat lunch !

Have spoken now with over 100 different IT support providers, and not once had any issue with enabling SMB1 on a server for a server scan setup. If SMB1 is a problem for you, then you already have much larger problems in your security setup.

If SMB1 is a problem for you then you should have done a better job in securing the office/server environment in the first place.

[slimslob]

Re: White Privilege, clear cut.

SMB1 is no less secure than SMB2 or SMB3 They all have their own vulnerabilities. Fundamentally, cybersecurity for the most part comes down to how educated the end user is. As they are the weak point in a chain of defence against an attack. SMBv2 and the later SMBv3 are the same protocols, but with a few updates to offer better security where the end user has failed.




Have spoken now with over 100 different IT support providers, and not once had any issue with enabling SMB1 on a server for a server scan setup. If SMB1 is a problem for you, then you already have much larger problems in your security setup.

If SMB1 is a problem for you then you should have done a better job in securing the office/server environment in the first place.

Being retired for a few years I haven't worked with Server 2019. As for Windows 10 the biggest problem I see with SMB1 is that enabling it is only a temporary fix. The next time a security update installs in will disable SMB1.

[bsm2]

Re: White Privilege, clear cut.

SMB1 is no less secure than SMB2 or SMB3 They all have their own vulnerabilities. Fundamentally, cybersecurity for the most part comes down to how educated the end user is. As they are the weak point in a chain of defence against an attack. SMBv2 and the later SMBv3 are the same protocols, but with a few updates to offer better security where the end user has failed.




Have spoken now with over 100 different IT support providers, and not once had any issue with enabling SMB1 on a server for a server scan setup. If SMB1 is a problem for you, then you already have much larger problems in your security setup.

If SMB1 is a problem for you then you should have done a better job in securing the office/server environment in the first place.

Wrong SMB1 is a Known Security threat Case Closed
Notably, SMB1 was used as an attack channel for both the WannaCry and NotPetya mass ransomware attacks in 2017. SMBv1 is so insecure that most security experts now recommend that administrators disable it entirely via a group policy update.Dec 17, 2018

[BillyCarpenter]

Re: White Privilege, clear cut.

Being retired for a few years I haven't worked with Server 2019. As for Windows 10 the biggest problem I see with SMB1 is that enabling it is only a temporary fix. The next time a security update installs in will disable SMB1.

That is true. I've posted an article many times about SMB1 being dead and this is one reason why. The reason I turned on SMB1 is because the Kyocera MFP I was trying to get to scan didn't have the latest firmware and I didn't have the new firmware with me at the time. I wanted to make sure it was gonna work as I wasn't quite sure what the problem was. I went back yesterday and upgraded the firmware and turned SMB1 off.,

[BillyCarpenter]

Re: White Privilege, clear cut.

SMB1 is Dead

[Crowfeather]

Re: White Privilege, clear cut.

Wrong SMB1 is a Known Security threat Case Closed
Notably, SMB1 was used as an attack channel for both the WannaCry and NotPetya mass ransomware attacks in 2017. SMBv1 is so insecure that most security experts now recommend that administrators disable it entirely via a group policy update.Dec 17, 2018

Mate, USB Ports are a known security threat. Also, there was a patch fixing the Wannacry vulnerability.

[bsm2]

Re: White Privilege, clear cut.

Mate, USB Ports are a known security threat. Also, there was a patch fixing the Wannacry vulnerability.

Mate case closed for 3 years on Smb1
The Answer is still NO

[Crowfeather]

Re: White Privilege, clear cut.

Mate case closed for 3 years on Smb1
The Answer is still NO

I think you misunderstand how much legacy equipment still requires this feature, and how breaking it can be for certain customers to have it removed. If you hadn't realized there are many industries that rely on 20 + year old tech.

Try again in 30 years time. Certainly enabling SMB1 on a server, is not some crazy backwards horribly security mistake.


Besides, an insecure file access protocol is merely a gateway, once you've already compromised your network or devices in someway. It is an accelerant of the problem, not the actual cause. The question should always be, how to avoid it at the source, damage limitation can come after that. There are multiple alternatives for malware to proliferate beyond SMB1 anyway.