If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I suggest they self deport as quickly as possible. The choice is up to them......they can self deport or we can deport them by way of Alligator Alcatraz.
Vice President Kamala Harris left no doubt about where she stands on the Second Amendment when she spoke at the liberal teachers union conference in Houston.
Where exactly does she say they are coming for guns? I didn't read it anywhere in that article. Except maybe where the author interjects their opinion.
Do you mean the Emergencies Act? The answer is yes.
There never has been a War Powers Act. There used to be a War Measures Act. Jeez, with all the attention you pay to Canada, at least learn something.
There's really no difference between War Powers Act and Emergencies Act.
The War Measures Act was a Canadian statute that granted the federal government broad powers during times of war, invasion, or insurrection. It allowed the government to take actions, including suspending civil liberties, without parliamentary approval, and was invoked three times in Canadian history. It was replaced by the Emergencies Act in 1988.
Adversity temporarily visits a strong man but stays with the weak for a lifetime.
I suggest they self deport as quickly as possible. The choice is up to them......they can self deport or we can deport them by way of Alligator Alcatraz.
There's really no difference between War Powers Act and Emergencies Act.
The War Measures Act was a Canadian statute that granted the federal government broad powers during times of war, invasion, or insurrection. It allowed the government to take actions, including suspending civil liberties, without parliamentary approval, and was invoked three times in Canadian history. It was replaced by the Emergencies Act in 1988.
That is a lot more invasive into the rights of Canadian citizens than the US War Powers Act of 1973 that merely limited what the President could do as Commander in Chief without the advice and content of Congress.
There's really no difference between War Powers Act and Emergencies Act.
The War Measures Act was a Canadian statute that granted the federal government broad powers during times of war, invasion, or insurrection. It allowed the government to take actions, including suspending civil liberties, without parliamentary approval, and was invoked three times in Canadian history. It was replaced by the Emergencies Act in 1988.
As I already taught you, there has never been a "War Powers Act".
And I've already confirmed that the Emergencies Act was enacted to force a group of people out of downtown Ottawa.
That is a lot more invasive into the rights of Canadian citizens than the US War Powers Act of 1973 that merely limited what the President could do as Commander in Chief without the advice and content of Congress.
Lucky for you, you currently have a ruler that doesn't even bother to consult Congress. Fascism saves so much time.
As I already taught you, there has never been a "War Powers Act".
And I've already confirmed that the Emergencies Act was enacted to force a group of people out of downtown Ottawa.
This is all readily available information.
You're a f'n liar.
Adversity temporarily visits a strong man but stays with the weak for a lifetime.
That's a pretty big statement without any evidence to back it up.
Which part is a lie? The part where I schooled you on the fact that there has never been a War Powers Act?
Or the part where it was enacted to remove the truckers from downtown Ottawa?
As I already taught you, there has never been a "War Powers Act".
And I've already confirmed that the Emergencies Act was enacted to force a group of people out of downtown Ottawa.
This is all readily available information.
The only thing that you have taught us is how wrong you are.
The War Powers Act is a law passed by the U.S. Congress on November 7, 1973, over the veto of President Richard Nixon. It sought to restrain the president’s ability to commit U.S. forces overseas by requiring the executive branch to consult with and report to Congress before involving U.S. forces in foreign hostilities.
Comment