DOGE is a SCAM

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bsm2
    IT Manager

    25,000+ Posts
    • Feb 2008
    • 29373

    #1

    DOGE is a SCAM

    DOGE’s expenses have risen above $40 million, with weekly costs now exceeding $10 million.
    If Musk doge is searching computer data for waste or fraud why are the people doing this programmers who write code instead of forensic accountants who crunch numbers?

    In its supposed “savings” report, DOGE claimed to have saved $55 billion — a small portion of of which came from capping payments for research grants. The rest? There aren’t any real savings. All DOGE did was cancel government contracts. That’s like deciding to stop paying your bills and mortgage to cover your credit card debt, only to realize your so-called “savings” won’t even cover a single interest payment.

    A common theme in the DOGE data is the cancellation of subscription-based services that federal congressional and public affairs offices rely on, such as newspapers with paywalls, Beltway tipsheets, and telephone and email directory systems. This move will only make the government less efficient and force those in these roles to spend more time tracking down news and contact information essential to their work. These contracts were all approved by the agencies with money allocated by Congress, who seems to have conceded more of their authority to Musk every day.

    Since Trump's inauguration on January 20, Musk has dispatched members of his Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to scrutinize sensitive personnel and payment information in government computer systems and led a successful drive to dismantle two agencies - one that provides a lifeline to the world's needy and another that protects Americans from unscrupulous lenders.

    Douglas Holtz-Eakin, a former Republican director of the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), said the agencies Musk and Trump have targeted to date account for a tiny fraction of the overall federal budget, which is projected to reach $7 trillion this fiscal year, according to the CBO.

    Musk’s overhaul of the federal government seems to have hit a snag: His Department of Government Efficiency posted classified information on its website.

    Musk’s team posted secret information about the staff and size of a U.S. intelligence agency on their new website harming national security.

    A person from Musk's (DOGE) has IT access to the Washington department overseeing nuclear weapons, without a government background check, according to multiple reports.

    And plans by Musk’s DOGE team to gain access to an IRS system that contains detailed financial information about millions of taxpayers, including their tax returns are raising alarms.

    Several members of the DOGE team run by the South African-born billionaire were granted "administrative" access to OPM computer systems days after Trump's Jan. 20 inauguration.

    They were given them sweeping authority to install and modify software on government-supplied equipment and, according to two OPM officials, to alter internal documentation of their own activities.

    The approval for Musk’s team to use the remote-access and file-transfer software, known as PuTTY, has alarmed Labor Department’s career employees. Musk, the head of DOGE, has dispatched subordinates throughout the government to radically overhaul or dismantle federal agencies with the backing of President Donald Trump.

    Five former Treasury secretaries warned that recent actions by the Trump administration and Elon Musk’s DOGE team at the Treasury Department raise “substantial cause for concern” that the United States’ financial commitments are being “unlawfully” undermined.

    “Any hint of the selective suspension of congressionally authorized payments will be a breach of trust and ultimately, a form of default. And our credibility, once lost, will prove difficult to regain,” they wrote.

    Additionally, Musk’s activities present a national security nightmare as they gain accessto HomelandSecurity, the Department of Defense, FBI and CIA. . Consider what the intelligence agencies of U.S. allies and adversaries see when the American president grants sweeping access to the basic systems that make the U.S. government run to a team of young people who havee no government experience, who may not have been put through standard personnel vetting processes, and who work for an unelected figure with extensive personal financial interests in national security spending.

    USAID was investigating Starlink for helping Russia in the Ukraine war. Not only do many Russian operatives claim to have access to Starlink, but last September Ukrainian forces downed a Russian drone that had a Starlink terminal integrated with its systems.

    A representative from Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency now works at the Department of Veterans Affairs, where they have been given access to contracting systems as well as information on VA operations and information technology systems.

    Few developments better typify the unique insanity of the current political moment than the ascent of “Big Balls,”a 19-year-old software engineer who briefly worked at Elon Musk’s brain startup Neuralink, got recruited to the billionaire’s government-deconstructionist effort DOGE and, now, in a twist so ridiculous it seems like it was stolen straight out of South Park, has apparently been hired as a “senior advisor” to the U.S. State Department.

    In reality, “Big Balls” is Edward Coristine, a high-achieving tech wunderkind, and the large-testicle-alluding-honorific is merely his online username.

    Wired initially reported that Coristine had previously worked for Path Network, a cybersecurity firm that was known to hire reformed cybercriminals. Bloomberg subsequently reported that Coristine was actually fired from that firm after he leaked “internal information to the [company’s] competitors.” “I can confirm that Edward Coristine’s brief contract was terminated after the conclusion of an internal investigation into the leaking of proprietary company information that coincided with his tenure,” a Path Network spokesperson told the outlet last week.

    Now, for whatever reason Balls/Coristine has been given a horrifying amount of access to the data and internal systems of the federal government. In addition to Coristine, another DOGE member—23-year-old former SpaceX intern Luke Farritor—has also reportedly been given some position at the State Department. Like Coristine, he is also listed as working for the Bureau of Diplomatic Technology. Gizmodo reached out to the State Department for more information on what Big Balls and Farritor are doing for the government and will update this story if it responds.

    American adversaries surely see an espionage and blackmail bonanza. Less obviously but just as crucially, U.S. allies, accustomed to doing business and sharing information with the United States on a day-to-day basis, are likely to take a hard look at their typical routines. Will they be willing to continue operating as usual?

    Mr. Musk’s business ventures are heavily reliant on China. He borrowed at least $1.4 billion from banks controlled by the Chinese government to help build Tesla’s Shanghai gigafactory, which was responsible for more than half of Tesla’s global deliveries in the third quarter of 2024," the general Honore writes in an Op-Ed for The New York Times.

    "China does not tend to give things away," he adds. "The country’s laws stipulate that the Communist Party can demand intelligence from any company doing business in China, in exchange for participating in the country’s markets."
  • bsm2
    IT Manager

    25,000+ Posts
    • Feb 2008
    • 29373

    #2
    The DOGE tech boys want to go after food stamps now. Every $1 in SNAP benefits helps generate an estimated $1.50 in economic activity. Hands off, punks. 🍅

    Comment

    • bsm2
      IT Manager

      25,000+ Posts
      • Feb 2008
      • 29373

      #3

      Comment

      • BillyCarpenter
        Field Supervisor

        Site Contributor
        VIP Subscriber
        10,000+ Posts
        • Aug 2020
        • 16308

        #4
        So, over 100 Trannies used an official NSA chat to fantasize about their kinks and sex fetishes. Transgender sex chats. All were fired.


        DNI Tulsi Gabbard moves to terminate, revoke security clearances of NSA employees tied to explicit chatroom

        Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard addressed reports of NSA employees misusing an internal agency messaging board and discussing explicit content on 'Jesse Watters Primetime.'
        Adversity temporarily visits a strong man but stays with the weak for a lifetime.

        Comment

        • bsm2
          IT Manager

          25,000+ Posts
          • Feb 2008
          • 29373

          #5
          You do not have permission to view this gallery.
          This gallery has 1 photos.

          Comment

          • bsm2
            IT Manager

            25,000+ Posts
            • Feb 2008
            • 29373

            #6
            Originally posted by BillyCarpenter
            So, over 100 Trannies used an official NSA chat to fantasize about their kinks and sex fetishes. Transgender sex chats. All were fired.


            DNI Tulsi Gabbard moves to terminate, revoke security clearances of NSA employees tied to explicit chatroom

            https://www.foxnews.com/media/dni-tu...icit-chatrooms
            Wow glad your really really into Trans women

            Apparently you believe anything

            Keep up the great work

            Comment

            • bsm2
              IT Manager

              25,000+ Posts
              • Feb 2008
              • 29373

              #7
              You do not have permission to view this gallery.
              This gallery has 1 photos.

              Comment

              • bsm2
                IT Manager

                25,000+ Posts
                • Feb 2008
                • 29373

                #8
                Billionaire Elon Musk said Social Security payments were going out to people in the system aged 150 years old, but that is likely false.
                Social Security systems automatically cut off benefits for anyone recorded as 115 or older.

                Read more by clicking the link in comments.


                So Nothing what a Surprise

                Comment

                • bsm2
                  IT Manager

                  25,000+ Posts
                  • Feb 2008
                  • 29373

                  #9
                  Yep DOGE is Doge SHIT

                  ​​​
                  Not authorized to do shit

                  Congress didn't approve it and Zero power to do Shit

                  Judge says mass firings of probationary employees by the Trump administration were invalid Katherine Li Feb 27, 2025, 8:20 PM ET

                  Share

                  Save
                  Read in app
                  Protest outside Office of Personnel Management headquarters in Washington.

                  Kent Nishimura/REUTERS
                  A federal judge in California said on Thursday that the US Office of Personnel Management must withdraw memos calling for other federal agencies to terminate probationary employees en masse, stating that the OPM exceeded its legal authority.


                  US District Judge William Alsup of San Francisco said that except for its own employees, "OPM does not have any authority whatsoever, under any statute in the history of the universe," to direct another federal agency to fire their workers, and that OPM must notify other agencies that it did not have the power to issue such a directive.

                  "All efforts by OPM to enforce it are invalid, pending further order of the court," he added.

                  A spokesperson for the OPM declined to comment when reached by Business Insider.

                  The order issued by Alsup comes in response to a lawsuit filed last week by a coalition of five labor unions and five nonprofit organizations challenging the Trump administration's efforts to shrink the federal workforce. The lawsuit is just one of several pushing back against the Trump administration's stance that the federal workforce is bloated and inefficient.

                  Plaintiffs argued that OPM had no legal authority to terminate probationary employees, generally meaning those with less than a year on the job, and that the firings were based on false claims of poor performance.

                  Government attorneys said in court that OPM did not mandate the firings but merely advised agencies to assess whether probationary employees met performance standards. They argued that these employees are not entitled to guaranteed employment and that federal agencies should prioritize retaining only top-performing and mission-critical staff.

                  Alsap could summon Charles Ezell, Acting Director of OPM, to testify in court under oath in March about his communications to agencies regarding terminating employees. DOGE office-affiliated employees can also be subpoenaed to court.

                  "I can't order what I'm about to say because we don't have the parties in front of me to give relief. But I'm going to count on the government to do the right thing and to go a little bit further than I have ordered," said Alsap shortly before adjourning the court, "and to let some of these agencies know what I have ruled because I would hate for probationary employees to lose their job and for the government to be compromised."

                  "This ruling by Judge Alsup is an important initial victory for patriotic Americans across this country who were illegally fired from their jobs by an agency that had no authority to do so," said Everett Kelley, National President of the American Federation of Government Employees. "These are rank-and-file workers who joined the federal government to make a difference in their communities, only to be suddenly terminated due to this administration's disdain for federal employees and desire to privatize their work."

                  Read next
                  Elon Musk
                  Layoff
                  Law
                  This story is available exclusively to Business Insider subscribers. Become an Insider and start reading now. Have an account? Log in.
                  Jump to

                  Main content
                  Search
                  Account

                  Have an account? Log in

                  Comment

                  • bsm2
                    IT Manager

                    25,000+ Posts
                    • Feb 2008
                    • 29373

                    #10
                    Social Security Administration aims to cut about 7,000 jobs, prompting fears of customer service impact

                    What could go Wrong

                    Comment

                    • bsm2
                      IT Manager

                      25,000+ Posts
                      • Feb 2008
                      • 29373

                      #11
                      USDA hires back all 6,000 fired a month ago with back pay. So Musk gave them a month paid vacation. Seems a bit wasteful.

                      Comment

                      • Copier Addict
                        Aging Tech

                        Site Contributor
                        10,000+ Posts
                        • Jul 2013
                        • 14361

                        #12
                        Originally posted by bsm2
                        USDA hires back all 6,000 fired a month ago with back pay. So Musk gave them a month paid vacation. Seems a bit wasteful.
                        I don't know about wasteful. He managed to give them all holidays at the same time. That sounds like efficiency to me. Hahaha

                        Comment

                        • BillyCarpenter
                          Field Supervisor

                          Site Contributor
                          VIP Subscriber
                          10,000+ Posts
                          • Aug 2020
                          • 16308

                          #13
                          Keir finds out the problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other folk's money,

                          Keir Starmer pulled the pin on steep welfare cuts. Now for the hard part.


                          MPs are digesting a sweeping social security shake-up that marks arguably the biggest test of the British prime minister’s authority yet.



                          LONDON — Keir Starmer is betting that hefty cuts to Britain’s welfare bill won’t alienate his party — or turn off voters. Now to put that theory to the test.

                          After weeks of behind-the-scenes wrangling, the U.K.’s center-left government on Tuesday afternoon unveiled a sweeping package of reforms to Britain’s social security system, aimed at saving £5 billion a year by 2030.

                          Its includes controversial proposals to narrow the criteria for claiming disability support, and cuts to some health-related benefits.​


                          And it comes amid deep concern from some of his own MPs that this is not what Starmer’s Labour was elected to do.

                          Defending the “biggest changes to the welfare system in a generation,” the prime minister insisted he would not stand by while millions of people become “trapped out of work and abandoned by the system,” while promising to “always protect the most severely disabled people to live with dignity.”

                          Behind the scenes, Starmer’s ministers have spent weeks making the case for reform, citing figures showing one in 10 people of working age are now claiming sickness or disability benefits in the U.K., and highlighting projections that the welfare bill could hit £70 billion a year by the end of this parliament.

                          It comes against a gloomy economic backdrop for the U.K., with Chancellor Rachel Reeves set to explain how she will balance the books in a spring economic statement next week.

                          On Tuesday, Starmer’s lofty promises on welfare made contact with the real world.

                          Nervous Labour MPs are now mulling whether his reforms — unveiled by Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall — are one difficult decision too far for a party which abhorred steep welfare cuts under the last Conservative government.​



                          Adversity temporarily visits a strong man but stays with the weak for a lifetime.

                          Comment

                          • Copier Addict
                            Aging Tech

                            Site Contributor
                            10,000+ Posts
                            • Jul 2013
                            • 14361

                            #14
                            Originally posted by BillyCarpenter
                            Keir finds out the problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other folk's money,

                            Keir Starmer pulled the pin on steep welfare cuts. Now for the hard part.


                            MPs are digesting a sweeping social security shake-up that marks arguably the biggest test of the British prime minister’s authority yet.



                            LONDON — Keir Starmer is betting that hefty cuts to Britain’s welfare bill won’t alienate his party — or turn off voters. Now to put that theory to the test.

                            After weeks of behind-the-scenes wrangling, the U.K.’s center-left government on Tuesday afternoon unveiled a sweeping package of reforms to Britain’s social security system, aimed at saving £5 billion a year by 2030.

                            Its includes controversial proposals to narrow the criteria for claiming disability support, and cuts to some health-related benefits.


                            And it comes amid deep concern from some of his own MPs that this is not what Starmer’s Labour was elected to do.

                            Defending the “biggest changes to the welfare system in a generation,” the prime minister insisted he would not stand by while millions of people become “trapped out of work and abandoned by the system,” while promising to “always protect the most severely disabled people to live with dignity.”

                            Behind the scenes, Starmer’s ministers have spent weeks making the case for reform, citing figures showing one in 10 people of working age are now claiming sickness or disability benefits in the U.K., and highlighting projections that the welfare bill could hit £70 billion a year by the end of this parliament.

                            It comes against a gloomy economic backdrop for the U.K., with Chancellor Rachel Reeves set to explain how she will balance the books in a spring economic statement next week.

                            On Tuesday, Starmer’s lofty promises on welfare made contact with the real world.

                            Nervous Labour MPs are now mulling whether his reforms — unveiled by Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall — are one difficult decision too far for a party which abhorred steep welfare cuts under the last Conservative government.​


                            So why have the republicans never learned the same when it comes to welfare for the ultra wealthy? I mean, trumpy increased the national debt by close to 4 trillion dollars with his handouts to them. Eventually other people's money runs out, right?

                            Comment

                            • BillyCarpenter
                              Field Supervisor

                              Site Contributor
                              VIP Subscriber
                              10,000+ Posts
                              • Aug 2020
                              • 16308

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Copier Addict

                              So why have the republicans never learned the same when it comes to welfare for the ultra wealthy? I mean, trumpy increased the national debt by close to 4 trillion dollars with his handouts to them. Eventually other people's money runs out, right?
                              You have a dangerous understanding of taxing the rich.

                              1. When you raise taxes on the rich they pass it down to you.

                              2. Low taxes on corporations encourages investment when competing against other countries.
                              Adversity temporarily visits a strong man but stays with the weak for a lifetime.

                              Comment

                              Working...