-
-
Re: Time to drive thre liberals nuts
Who's on First?
Comment
-
Re: Time to drive thre liberals nuts
Falsely? It's possible, I've been wrong before. Also, a lot of Marxists and communists are proud to be what they are. Others, are Marxists themselves, but don't know that they are.
If it quacks like a duck, walks like a duck, looks like a duck, and has the genetical composition of a duck then it's a duck.
But like I said, maybe I am wrong. But let's find out.
Classical Marxism, whose father is communism, is pretty broad now, but for the most part it's like an umbrella.
I call Marxists, all Post-Modernists.
Where they argue that the truth is relative. How they argue that all gender is no longer an objective reality based on natural law, but rather gender is based on subjective reality or rather the relative truth.
But change the above statement about gender with... pretty much any argument in politics, and you start to get a clear picture of who is a Marxist.
We're becoming more anthropocentric as a society, and that's a damn shame.Comment
-
Re: Time to drive thre liberals nuts
What YOU call Marxists has no bearing at all in this conversation. In other words, I don't care what you personally call Marxists.
Try looking it up for real and discover the actual meaning
I don't know for sure but I doubt that Marx categorized gender. Once again you are projecting your own views into your description.Comment
-
Re: Time to drive thre liberals nuts
Mischaracterization!
Fact Check: He didn't categorize gender, and I didn't say that he did.
What did I say?
I said: "I call Marxists, all Post-Modernists."
Why? Because: "they argue that the truth is relative."
Example? Sure: "How they argue that all gender is no longer an objective reality based on natural law, but rather gender is based on subjective reality or rather the relative truth."
AS AN EXAMPLE.
Like Joe always says: "C'mon Man!".Comment
-
Re: Time to drive thre liberals nuts
You're the same person who claims that communism is real but can't name a single communist country. Likewise, you claim that capitalism is real, but can't name one single capitalist country.Adversity temporarily visits a strong man but stays with the weak for a lifetime.Comment
-
Re: Time to drive thre liberals nuts
You are a disingenuous individual copier addict, let me tell you why, because you ask me to "look it up". I have, and I do. You think it's a simple definition?
Then we we need to define Classical Marxism, then Marxism-Leninism, then Marxism-Leninism-Maoism (yeah that's a thing), then Marxism-Leninism-Maoism-Gonzalo thought. What about Marxist-Syndicalism, with Anarcho-syndicalism. Like, I can go on.
But I'll bite your bait.
Source: Simple Wikipedia [Just for you]
Marxists believe in:
The world is split into two classes (groups) of people. These are the workers and the richer capitalists who exploit the workers
There is a class conflict
When workers realize their exploitation, they will revolt and take over ownership of factories and materials (dictatorship of the proletariat)
Communism (stateless, classless society with free enterprise).
The idea that people who have been exploited will not in turn exploit those who they were made to believe exploited them
It's a fucking UMBRELLA of philosophy man, like, there is a lot to cover, that you will not read.
But now, for what I really want to say.
Let's define Post Modernism together.
Wikipedia:
Postmodernism says that there is no real truth. It says that knowledge is always made or invented and not discovered. Because knowledge is made by people, a person cannot know something with certainty - all ideas and facts are 'believed' instead of 'known'. People believe that they know what the truth is, but they will think that the truth is something different later. This is the opposite of 'objectivity', which says that the truth is always there and people have to discover it.
That is not my bias, I didn't make that interpretation. Are we good?
Want me to define communism into the most basic of ideas too?Comment
Comment