Jan 6 Attack of the US Capital

[BillyCarpenter]

Re: Jan 6 Attack of the US Capital

Please pay special attention to the second phrase.

1: to relieve especially of a charge, obligation, or hardship. 2 : to clear from accusation or blame — compare acquit, exculpate.

I didn't ask for the definition. I ask you to explain how Trump can be exonerated when he wasn't charged with a crime? In the USA, you're innocent until proven guilty.

So, please explain how Trump was supposed to exonerate himself?

You're full of shit. Again. And we all know you don't answer any questions.

[Copier Addict]

Re: Jan 6 Attack of the US Capital

I didn't ask for the definition. I ask you to explain how Trump can be exonerated when he wasn't charged with a crime? In the USA, you're innocent until proven guilty.

So, please explain how Trump was supposed to exonerate himself?

You're full of shit. Again. And we all know you don't answer any questions.

Okay, I see you are being a bit obtuse.
Trumpy was accused of several things and the Meuller report failed to exonerated him.
If you actually read the definition of "exonerate" you will see it specifies "to clear from accusation or blame". You see, he didn't have to be charged with anything to potentially be exonerated, simply accused. Keep digging if you want to be further slapped down.

[BillyCarpenter]

Re: Jan 6 Attack of the US Capital

Okay, I see you are being a bit obtuse.
Trumpy was accused of several things and the Meuller report failed to exonerated him.
If you actually read the definition of "exonerate" you will see it specifies "to clear from accusation or blame". You see, he didn't have to be charged with anything to potentially be exonerated, simply accused. Keep digging if you want to be further slapped down.

I see that you insist on continuing your big top act - clown.

Here's a question.


Your Tranny accuses you of raping him during one of your drunken stupors. The cops investigate and don't charge you because they didn't have enough evidence but said that they can't be 100% certain that you aren't guilty of rape.

What does that mean? Please enlighten us ol' wise one. Idiot.

[bsm2]

Re: Jan 6 Attack of the US Capital

I see that you insist on continuing your big top act - clown.

Here's a question.


Your Tranny accuses you of raping him during one of your drunken stupors. The cops investigate and don't charge you because they didn't have enough evidence but said that they can't be 100% certain that you aren't guilty of rape.

What does that mean? Please enlighted us ol' wise one. Idiot.

Another date gone wrong
So sorry to hear you were raped.

[Copier Addict]

Re: Jan 6 Attack of the US Capital

I see that you insist on continuing your big top act - clown.

Here's a question.


Your Tranny accuses you of raping him during one of your drunken stupors. The cops investigate and don't charge you because they didn't have enough evidence but said that they can't be 100% certain that you aren't guilty of rape.

What does that mean? Please enlighted us ol' wise one. Idiot.

Hahaha. Textbook rightie discussion technique. Well done.
You go from being schooled heartily directly to attempted insults.
Let's hear some more homophobia from you Little Billy. You really are predictable.
Now, do you have anything to actually contribute to this discussion? Unlikely.

[BillyCarpenter]

Re: Jan 6 Attack of the US Capital

Hahaha. Textbook rightie discussion technique. Well done.
You go from being schooled heartily directly to attempted insults.
Let's hear some more homophobia from you Little Billy. You really are predictable.
Now, do you have anything to actually contribute to this discussion? Unlikely.

Lets think about this for a minute.

You said that you didn't think Trump colluded with Putin.


Now you're arguing that Trump is guilty.

Conclusion: You're full of shit and like to argue with yourself.

GTFOH.

[bsm2]

Re: Jan 6 Attack of the US Capital

[Copier Addict]

Re: Jan 6 Attack of the US Capital

Lets think about this for a minute.

You said that you didn't think Trump colluded with Putin.


Now you're arguing that Trump is guilty.

Conclusion: You're full of shit and like to argue with yourself.

GTFOH.

No, actually you are just trying to muddy the water so the other amigos won't see how uninformed you really are.
You really don't understand anything, do you?
I have not said trumpy is guilty or innocent of anything. I simply pointed out what the Meuller report didn't say.
Now, it's time for you to climb back under the porch Little Billy.

[BillyCarpenter]

Re: Jan 6 Attack of the US Capital

No, actually you are just trying to muddy the water so the other amigos won't see how uninformed you really are.
You really don't understand anything, do you?
I have not said trumpy is guilty or innocent of anything. I simply pointed out what the Meuller report didn't say.
Now, it's time for you to climb back under the porch Little Billy.

The Meuller investigation was launched (Failure to Launch) for one reason and ONE reason only - is there enough evidence to charge Trump with a crime. It wasn't to exonerate Trump. That's not the way our system works. It very rare that the prosecution can say that someone is 100% innocent. The same goes for a jury in a court of law.

The point you're attempting to make is childish, irrelevant and nothing more than a left wing talking point.

Go rub your clit and shut up.

[bsm2]

Re: Jan 6 Attack of the US Capital

The Meuller investigation was launched (Failure to Launch) for one reason and ONE reason only - is there enough evidence to charge Trump with a crime. It wasn't to exonerate Trump. That's not the way our system works. It very rare that the prosecution can say that someone is 100% innocent. The same goes for a jury in a court of law.

The point you're attempting to make is childish, irrelevant and nothing more than a left wing talking point.

Go rub your clit and shut up.

Some HOAX

Over the course of his nearly two-year-long probe, special counsel Robert Mueller and his team of prosecutors have now indicted 34 individuals and three Russian businesses on charges ranging from computer hacking to conspiracy and financial crimes.

Those indictments have led to seven guilty pleas and five people sentenced to prison.

[bsm2]

Re: Jan 6 Attack of the US Capital

Do you think TRUMP will have the Balls to Testifly?

[Copier Addict]

Re: Jan 6 Attack of the US Capital

The Meuller investigation was launched (Failure to Launch) for one reason and ONE reason only - is there enough evidence to charge Trump with a crime. It wasn't to exonerate Trump. That's not the way our system works. It very rare that the prosecution can say that someone is 100% innocent. The same goes for a jury in a court of law.

The point you're attempting to make is childish, irrelevant and nothing more than a left wing talking point.

Go rub your clit and shut up.

There, now everyone knows how little you know. I was trying to save you the embarrassment of that, but here we are.

[BillyCarpenter]

Re: Jan 6 Attack of the US Capital

There, now everyone knows how little you know. I was trying to save you the embarrassment of that, but here we are.

Try to answer a question for once in your miserable life.

Is Trump guilty? Yes or no?

[Copier Addict]

Re: Jan 6 Attack of the US Capital

Try to answer a question for once in your miserable life.

Is Trump guilty? Yes or no?

Guilty of what? Please be more specific

[BillyCarpenter]

Re: Jan 6 Attack of the US Capital

Guilty of what? Please be more specific

You'll do ANYthing to get out of answering a direct question.

There's 2 reason that you always refuse to answer a question:

1. You're a troll.

2. You can't support your stance on anything.

Are you ready to answer for Canada's failing healthcare system? No? Didn't think so.