Trump Indictments so Far
Collapse
X
-
Re: Trump Indictments so Far
Trump's First Stop After Leaving Miami Courthouse Isn't Mar-a-Lago: 'Absolutely BRILLIANT'
Sent from my SM-G990U using TapatalkComment
-
Re: Trump Indictments so Far
Trump's First Stop After Leaving Miami Courthouse Isn't Mar-a-Lago: 'Absolutely BRILLIANT'
Sent from my SM-G990U using Tapatalk
Really Not Guilty
Did have the documents Yes
Was he ask to return them Yes
Did he lie about having them Yes
Did he hide them Yes
Did he refused to return Yes
Were they in unsure locations Yes
Did he show them to people YesComment
-
Re: Trump Indictments so Far
Could say the same for Biden . It maybe even worse if Biden did not even no about them .Comment
-
Re: Trump Indictments so Far
And Trump was the president and had the authority to declassify documents. The same was not true of Senator and VP Biden, and he had, in his various offices and garage, documents from both periods.Comment
-
Re: Trump Indictments so Far
You forgot to mention former Vice President Pence whom only 2 weeks ago the Biden DOJ decided not to charge.Comment
-
Re: Trump Indictments so Far
OIP.jpg
All this talk of Bidens corruption, show us the proof already! Whistleblowers who don't show up or testify, or possibly don't even exist, bribery schemes with no evidence, claim to have tapes, great let's hear them. The evidence they claim to have is thinner than the hair atop Jim Jordan head! All I hear is a bunch of idiots trying to deflect from another Trump fuck up.
This is nothing like Hillary Clinton, Mike Pence, or Joe Biden. In fact, what Clinton did with her private email server wasn't even illegal at that time.
Whataboutism is not a valid defense for treason.
Last edited by mojorolla; 06-14-2023, 08:09 PM.Failing to plan is planning to fail!!!Comment
-
Re: Trump Indictments so Far
[ATTACH=CONFIG]58596[/ATTACH]
All this talk of Bidens corruption, show us the proof already! Whistleblowers who don't show up or testify, or possibly don't even exist, bribery schemes with no evidence, claim to have tapes, great let's hear them. The evidence they claim to have is thinner than the hair atop Jim Jordan head! All I hear is a bunch of idiots trying to deflect from another Trump fuck up.
This is nothing like Hillary Clinton, Mike Pence, or Joe Biden. In fact, what Clinton did with her private email server wasn't even illegal at that time.
Whataboutism is not a valid defense for treason.
Sent from my SM-G990U using TapatalkComment
-
Re: Trump Indictments so Far
[ATTACH=CONFIG]58596[/ATTACH]
All this talk of Bidens corruption, show us the proof already! Whistleblowers who don't show up or testify, or possibly don't even exist, bribery schemes with no evidence, claim to have tapes, great let's hear them. The evidence they claim to have is thinner than the hair atop Jim Jordan head! All I hear is a bunch of idiots trying to deflect from another Trump fuck up.
This is nothing like Hillary Clinton, Mike Pence, or Joe Biden. In fact, what Clinton did with her private email server wasn't even illegal at that time.
Whataboutism is not a valid defense for treason.
Clintons email server was illegal at the time, as was her wiping it after it had been subpoenaed. Since the federal government started using email they have required certain, ever tightening standards for security, which her server didn't meet. Also, using that server rather than the official State department servers looks a whole like like making multiple deposits under to $10k limit to avoid reporting, which will get you investigated for what is called structuring, intentionally trying to avoid the limit to avoid an investigation. Absolute proof she did something wrong? No, but if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's not likely to be a persian cat.
Trump had the authority to declassify documents at will as president. Neither Clinton, Pence nor Biden had that, yet all three had classified documents in their possession (Clintons were emails, but the standard is the same) and are not being prosecuted, or even really investigated.
It's been said before, and I'll say it now, if it weren't for double standards leftists would have no standards at all.Comment
-
Re: Trump Indictments so Far
Proof of Biden's corruption has been shown, some refuse to believe it User Clip: Biden Tells Story of Getting the Ukraine Prosecutor Fired | C-SPAN.org . Also look at what is on the laptop from hell, which even the FBI admits is legit, if you don't mind the risk of arrest. Yes, you can be arrested for viewing some of that, but Hunter Biden walks free after creating it.
Clintons email server was illegal at the time, as was her wiping it after it had been subpoenaed. Since the federal government started using email they have required certain, ever tightening standards for security, which her server didn't meet. Also, using that server rather than the official State department servers looks a whole like like making multiple deposits under to $10k limit to avoid reporting, which will get you investigated for what is called structuring, intentionally trying to avoid the limit to avoid an investigation. Absolute proof she did something wrong? No, but if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's not likely to be a persian cat.
Trump had the authority to declassify documents at will as president. Neither Clinton, Pence nor Biden had that, yet all three had classified documents in their possession (Clintons were emails, but the standard is the same) and are not being prosecuted, or even really investigated.
It's been said before, and I'll say it now, if it weren't for double standards leftists would have no standards at all.
Trump could have declassified documents, but he only had that power while he was President, not after leaving office. There is a process for declassification, and it does not consist of "thinking about it". If he can declassify them by thinking about them, then Biden could re-classify them by thinking about them as well.
Again, by pointing to something else, it does not nullify the facts of the case, Biden and Clinton have zero bearing on the case before the court. Videos of Hunter Biden smoking crack have nothing to do with this case, period. Yes, his kids a junkie, but until I see proof otherwise, he's just another dope addict. Biden is somehow a pants shitting vegetable AND a criminal mastermind all at the same time. Steals elections and runs bribery schemes but can't handle fucking stairs....c'mon!
This bullshit may work in the court of public opinion, but it does not work in a court of law.
Failing to plan is planning to fail!!!Comment
-
Re: Trump Indictments so Far
Members of the Trump admin also used private email, where is your outrage for them...? Comey (a Republican) re-opened the email investigation 10 days before the 2016 election, why wasn't that politization? Spare me the lecture on standards as the current GOP has none.
Trump could have declassified documents, but he only had that power while he was President, not after leaving office. There is a process for declassification, and it does not consist of "thinking about it". If he can declassify them by thinking about them, then Biden could re-classify them by thinking about them as well.
Again, by pointing to something else, it does not nullify the facts of the case, Biden and Clinton have zero bearing on the case before the court. Videos of Hunter Biden smoking crack have nothing to do with this case, period. Yes, his kids a junkie, but until I see proof otherwise, he's just another dope addict. Biden is somehow a pants shitting vegetable AND a criminal mastermind all at the same time. Steals elections and runs bribery schemes but can't handle fucking stairs....c'mon!
This bullshit may work in the court of public opinion, but it does not work in a court of law.
If Trump declassified documents, and the process if vastly different for the president than anyone else, then he had the right to those documents. Biden (or his handlers) reclassifying them now would be the same as making the online moniker mojorolla illegal now and arresting you for using it when it wasn't illegal when you started using. It's called an ex post facto law and it's unconstitutional, period. Thinking otherwise just demonstrates your ignorance of the constitution and your overwhelming desire to see Trump go down for something, anything, not matter what it takes or what laws have to be broken to do it. Not wanting the same standards applied to democrats further demonstrates this and your adherence to double standards.Comment
-
Re: Trump Indictments so Far
BTW, the laptop contains not only videos of Biden the younger doing illegal things, it also contains emails indicating illegal actions that include Biden the elder. These have been verified as coming from the Biden family and their "business associates". Even hunter admits that he did nothing to earn the various jobs he got and would not have gotten them if he wasn't the son of the VP.Comment
-
Re: Trump Indictments so Far
[ATTACH=CONFIG]58596[/ATTACH]
All this talk of Bidens corruption, show us the proof already! Whistleblowers who don't show up or testify, or possibly don't even exist, bribery schemes with no evidence, claim to have tapes, great let's hear them. The evidence they claim to have is thinner than the hair atop Jim Jordan head! All I hear is a bunch of idiots trying to deflect from another Trump fuck up.
This is nothing like Hillary Clinton, Mike Pence, or Joe Biden. In fact, what Clinton did with her private email server wasn't even illegal at that time.
Whataboutism is not a valid defense for treason.
Comment
Comment