World War III

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • NeoMatrix
    Senior Tech.

    2,500+ Posts
    • Nov 2010
    • 3514

    #1

    World War III

    Wind,Solar or Nuclear energy?
    Who ever believes that nuclear energy is safe wants to go to Chernobyl or Fukishima for a holiday.

    (I've post this before)
    During the World War our country Australia had a hydrogen generator factory located right here in our city. The gas-works (as it was known) created hydrogen gas by dropping fine water droplets onto super heated charcoal to form steam. The steam vapour was passed through a special membrane filter which separated the hydrogen an oxygen. All generated from tree burnt wood. The hydrogen gas was then used to run the hydrogen burning pumps in the gas-works, which transfered the excess hydrogen gas throughout the entire city's underground gas pipes.
    The whole gas-works was self running.

    Conclusion: We don't need unclean nuclear plants for anything what so every. Nor do we need electrolysis to separate water into hydrogen. On other social sites people commented and said that radiation is a necessary cure for cancer. Putting radiation into medical procedures is fools folly. The pharmaceutical and medical profession should go to prison for such in-humane practices.

    Further more, some scientists need to pull their head out of their backsides,and take a trip to either of the earths polar caps and measure the nuclear bomb radiation caused from the detonation of nuclear bombs during the 60's. In their endocrinated wisdom they may find the cause of global warming effects caused by extra man made radiation with the sun light angle of incidence effecting the polar absorption from the sun, which is causing the warming of the polar regions. The scientists Pons and Fleischmann demonstrated clearly that the heavy radioactive element deuterium in sea water causes excess energy in sea water to create excess heat. Man made Nuclear bombs effect the deuterium activity in sea water,along with sun light creating warming bands around the globe. Todate there have been 2000 registered nuclear detonations around the globe.

    Climate change is man made from nuclear stupidity. Do we need more of it...?
    Inauguration to the "AI cancel-culture" fraternity 1997...
    •••••• •••[§]• |N | € | o | M | Δ | t | π | ¡ | x | •[§]••• ••••••
  • NeoMatrix
    Senior Tech.

    2,500+ Posts
    • Nov 2010
    • 3514

    #2
    Re: World War III

    Arctic ice is showing signs of warming in Greenland north pole.

    The USA under-ice nuclear base "Camp Century" created in the 1960's is drifting on a glacier with tonnes of toxic waste towards the open sea. The nuclear radiation has already been measure in 2017 by scientists drilling around the top ice layers above the base.

    According to the video,70 years from now may be devastating for not only for Greenland,but the entire Arctic food chain, from krill to whales, and many other migrating animals.

    Video shows detail construction and day to day operations of the USA military nuclear base.

    You tube video. 51:58 mins
    Camp Century - The Hidden City Beneath the Ice | Full Documentary - YouTube

    We have enough problems with nuclear energy radiation now
    Pray we don't see any more...
    Inauguration to the "AI cancel-culture" fraternity 1997...
    •••••• •••[§]• |N | € | o | M | Δ | t | π | ¡ | x | •[§]••• ••••••

    Comment

    • slimslob
      Retired

      Site Contributor
      25,000+ Posts
      • May 2013
      • 36807

      #3
      Re: World War III

      Originally posted by NeoMatrix
      Arctic ice is showing signs of warming in Greenland north pole.

      The USA under-ice nuclear base "Camp Century" created in the 1960's is drifting on a glacier with tonnes of toxic waste towards the open sea. The nuclear radiation has already been measure in 2017 by scientists drilling around the top ice layers above the base.

      According to the video,70 years from now may be devastating for not only for Greenland,but the entire Arctic food chain, from krill to whales, and many other migrating animals.

      Video shows detail construction and day to day operations of the USA military nuclear base.

      You tube video. 51:58 mins
      Camp Century - The Hidden City Beneath the Ice | Full Documentary - YouTube

      We have enough problems with nuclear energy radiation now
      Pray we don't see any more...
      What is needed is a way to produce usable electrical energy directly from the radiation released by nuclear waste.

      Comment

      • NeoMatrix
        Senior Tech.

        2,500+ Posts
        • Nov 2010
        • 3514

        #4
        Re: World War III

        There is a method to reduce the radiation effect in solid materials, using Browns Gas. I'm not sure how it would work with liquids,or on a large scale application. According to Russian propaganda they know how to reduce the radiation in spent nuclear reactor fuel rods. I assume they may know about Browns gas.

        Browns gas can be created by electrolysis of water. I'm informed some time ago that the correct stoichiometric mix of OH OH during the electrolysis phase is the key component to creating Browns gas from water. The OH chemistry component is slightly different from the usual water electrolysis H H or O O gas separation.

        When the Browns gas is created, it's apparently burnt through a flame torch to heat the radioactive material and the OH OH chemical reaction while heating the material reduces the radiation down to much safer levels. How this would work with soil,rock,water on global scale is unknown.

        It's said that a Browns gas flame torch can be used to weld exotic materials together. Eg Iron to aluminium.

        People can purchase a readly available water electrolysis flame torch unit from companies in China. They have been available for about 15 years or more.

        The above is offered has information only. I make no claim as to be able to reduce the effects of global radiation. At the very least the above info offers a glimmer of hope for the future of humanity.
        Inauguration to the "AI cancel-culture" fraternity 1997...
        •••••• •••[§]• |N | € | o | M | Δ | t | π | ¡ | x | •[§]••• ••••••

        Comment

        • tsbservice
          Field tech

          Site Contributor
          5,000+ Posts
          • May 2007
          • 7910

          #5
          Re: World War III

          Neo where have you been for so long. Jeez we were so lone without philosopher
          Tell stupid prophecy we don't know.
          A tree is known by its fruit, a man by his deeds. A good deed is never lost, he who sows courtesy, reaps friendship, and he who plants kindness gathers love.
          Blessed are they who can laugh at themselves, for they shall never cease to be amused.

          Comment

          • NeoMatrix
            Senior Tech.

            2,500+ Posts
            • Nov 2010
            • 3514

            #6
            Re: World War III

            Originally posted by slimslob
            What is needed is a way to produce usable electrical energy directly from the radiation released by nuclear waste.
            The scientists Pons and Fleischmann have already introduce the scientific world to cold fusion.

            The scientist were running an electrical current through sea water which cause the deuterium in sea water to give off excess heat. The conservative claims are 4 times as much heat than the electrical current used to heat it.
            Would using man made contaminated radioactive seawater increase the deuterium heating effect exponentially?

            Construct a cold fusion seawater electrolysis boiler to drive a steam turbine + electrical generator, to power all industry. Would constructing a cold fusion boiler plant in proximity to a contamination site reduce the radiation of the contaminated area of land or sea?
            Hopeful is a positive ...
            Inauguration to the "AI cancel-culture" fraternity 1997...
            •••••• •••[§]• |N | € | o | M | Δ | t | π | ¡ | x | •[§]••• ••••••

            Comment

            • BillyCarpenter
              Field Supervisor

              Site Contributor
              VIP Subscriber
              10,000+ Posts
              • Aug 2020
              • 16308

              #7
              Re: World War III

              Why is the title of the thread WWIII but the OP only talks about nuclear power? I'm so confused.
              Adversity temporarily visits a strong man but stays with the weak for a lifetime.

              Comment

              • slimslob
                Retired

                Site Contributor
                25,000+ Posts
                • May 2013
                • 36807

                #8
                Re: World War III

                Originally posted by BillyCarpenter
                Why is the title of the thread WWIII but the OP only talks about nuclear power? I'm so confused.
                Maybe because WWIII will be a nuclear holocaust. The only way to survive is to know how to deal with radiation.

                Comment

                • Copier Addict
                  Aging Tech

                  Site Contributor
                  10,000+ Posts
                  • Jul 2013
                  • 14360

                  #9
                  Re: World War III

                  "Oxyhydrogen is associated with various exaggerated claims.[15][16][17] It is often called "Brown's gas" or "HHO gas", a term popularized by fringe physicist[18] Ruggero Santilli, who claimed that his HHO gas, produced by a special apparatus, is "a new form of water", with new properties, based on his fringe theory of "magnecules"."

                  Oxyhydrogen - Wikipedia.

                  Comment

                  • BillyCarpenter
                    Field Supervisor

                    Site Contributor
                    VIP Subscriber
                    10,000+ Posts
                    • Aug 2020
                    • 16308

                    #10
                    Re: World War III

                    Originally posted by slimslob
                    Maybe because WWIII will be a nuclear holocaust. The only way to survive is to know how to deal with radiation.
                    I don't think so. I've read the original post twice. His rant has nothing to do with war and everything to do with nuclear power in general. In any event, I disagree with him.
                    Adversity temporarily visits a strong man but stays with the weak for a lifetime.

                    Comment

                    Working...