Re: Do you stop work for lunch?
I've seen it with breaks, without breaks, with half an hour and with an hour. What I've seen from a Service Manager's viewpoint. People who get 1 hour lunches, get more done. Even if they have an hour for lunch and have to work 30 min more in the day to get it. One of the most productive places I've worked, did that very thing. Techs would eat in 15 -20 min, then go lay down in the car and take a nap for the remaining time. Yes, it does throw off the rhythm a bit, but in no time flat they've made it up and cranked out more work than they would have working straight through. They were also happier. Can't seem to get the company here to see that. You are encouraged to have a break and then told that everyone else in the company volunteered to eat on the run (or eat at your desk, if you're sales people). I found out, that all the volunteers no longer work for the company. So I insist that my people take at least 30 min. You got to have downtime.
I've seen it with breaks, without breaks, with half an hour and with an hour. What I've seen from a Service Manager's viewpoint. People who get 1 hour lunches, get more done. Even if they have an hour for lunch and have to work 30 min more in the day to get it. One of the most productive places I've worked, did that very thing. Techs would eat in 15 -20 min, then go lay down in the car and take a nap for the remaining time. Yes, it does throw off the rhythm a bit, but in no time flat they've made it up and cranked out more work than they would have working straight through. They were also happier. Can't seem to get the company here to see that. You are encouraged to have a break and then told that everyone else in the company volunteered to eat on the run (or eat at your desk, if you're sales people). I found out, that all the volunteers no longer work for the company. So I insist that my people take at least 30 min. You got to have downtime.
Comment