Had to set up a MFP these days and did as follows:
Using ipconfig it showed that the workstation had two nics's 10.132.136.3 and 10.139.115.10 so obviously each serving a segment (physical and/or logical I could not establish due to my lack of experience). Since other printers where connected to that workstation using the 10.132.136.xxx range I used Angry-IP-Scan to find an unused address there. However, IP-Scan in the latest beta version is showing automatically the IP-address of the workstation as a default and was giving me 10.220.0.5, WTF? So now we are having three segments? Why didn't give ipconfig or ipconfig /all me this 3rd IP-range?
Than I tried to hook-up the MFP by using the unoccupied 10.132.136.100 address. I could establish a connection, make a testprint and was able to see the web interface of the copier but with some delay. That's why I made a ping and was surprised to see packet losses of 50-75% and even sometimes a 100% loss.
Expecting a router causing this, I used tracert but it showed a direct connection between 10.132.136.3 the workstation and 10.132.136.100 the MFP, without any other nodes inbetween.
Question1:
Why are only two segments visible with ipconfig although obviously three with Angry-IP-Scan are present?
Question2:
Any explanation for the packet loss? I changed already the controller and NIC of the MFP with the same resuslts.
Hans
Using ipconfig it showed that the workstation had two nics's 10.132.136.3 and 10.139.115.10 so obviously each serving a segment (physical and/or logical I could not establish due to my lack of experience). Since other printers where connected to that workstation using the 10.132.136.xxx range I used Angry-IP-Scan to find an unused address there. However, IP-Scan in the latest beta version is showing automatically the IP-address of the workstation as a default and was giving me 10.220.0.5, WTF? So now we are having three segments? Why didn't give ipconfig or ipconfig /all me this 3rd IP-range?
Than I tried to hook-up the MFP by using the unoccupied 10.132.136.100 address. I could establish a connection, make a testprint and was able to see the web interface of the copier but with some delay. That's why I made a ping and was surprised to see packet losses of 50-75% and even sometimes a 100% loss.
Expecting a router causing this, I used tracert but it showed a direct connection between 10.132.136.3 the workstation and 10.132.136.100 the MFP, without any other nodes inbetween.
Question1:
Why are only two segments visible with ipconfig although obviously three with Angry-IP-Scan are present?
Question2:
Any explanation for the packet loss? I changed already the controller and NIC of the MFP with the same resuslts.
Hans
Comment