My company is debating switching to GSuite for our email provider-- or perhaps outlook. Our current provider is just not reliable, a lot of delayed transmissions, and days where emails just don't seem to send/receive-- and since we often use our servers as a placeholder for customers who do not have their own, this looks really awful when demonstrating the scan-to-email functions of newly installed copiers.
The problem is that we have thousands of machines configured to report via email using our current server, and I'm trying to conceive of a way to remedy this, that will not necessarily require a visit to each and every copier, but I am coming up short.
I'm pretty sure it's not going to be possibel to get around, but I am hoping someone here might be a bit more knowledgeable than myself in such matters.
So far I've been researching whether or not it's possible to get a custom Gsuite SMTP server (in which case perhaps we could rig it so our current config just reports to the new Gmail accounts instead,) buyt that doesn't seem possible. Also been researching possible methods of "rerouting" email, but it only seems to work "internally" if that makes any sense?
Anyway I would appreciate any input you guys might have.`
The problem is that we have thousands of machines configured to report via email using our current server, and I'm trying to conceive of a way to remedy this, that will not necessarily require a visit to each and every copier, but I am coming up short.
I'm pretty sure it's not going to be possibel to get around, but I am hoping someone here might be a bit more knowledgeable than myself in such matters.
So far I've been researching whether or not it's possible to get a custom Gsuite SMTP server (in which case perhaps we could rig it so our current config just reports to the new Gmail accounts instead,) buyt that doesn't seem possible. Also been researching possible methods of "rerouting" email, but it only seems to work "internally" if that makes any sense?
Anyway I would appreciate any input you guys might have.`
Comment