problem with sst 4.11

[Guest]

We've been told that we can't call it "IRA" over here in the UK, with the happenings over in northern ireland
SO it's the AIR instead

But have to say, still a clever box, apart from the crappy plastic ITB handle
See i'll have to have a few of them in the back of my car

So they break!
Thanks for the heads up.

[bnmand]

I have advised my salesman to NOT even mention the advanced box being used as a shared network resource. It is just stupid. Place your files out on your server, not on my copier. The copier hard drive is already incredibly busy,, and now they want to add extra network traffic to it.. When the drive craps out from all the traffic, when the sh** hits the fan, who do you think they are going to call to retrieve lost data,,, not their IT staff... no,, it will be the "copier guy". He/she will be the one responsible for the tragedy.

The network server will be backed up on a regular basis, while the advanced box will just sit there unattended happy as a clam till armegeddon

Even just servicing the copier would cause an interruption to their file access. I don't need any more headaches,, I need less

I agree. Important files should be stored on a server or some other device running RAID. Sure Canon wants their devices to be multifunctional and increase their market share, but you can only add so many features before it starts to become dysfunctional. Copiers can need repair a lot more than servers and I wouldn't trust my data stored on a copier.