Canon IR1740if information

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • irtek
    Trusted Tech

    100+ Posts
    • Jun 2009
    • 110

    #1

    Canon IR1740if information

    Looking for information about the Canon IR1740if? I am looking to possibly sell 3 to replace some Samsung SCX6345N machines. How are they at running envelopes? Thanks for any information on this machine.
  • zoraldinho
    teacher-guide-expert-guru

    Site Contributor
    5,000+ Posts
    • Mar 2008
    • 5006

    #2
    Re: Canon IR1740if information

    It's good machine but depends of envelope quality .
    If it ain't broke, don't fix it
    A picture is worth a thousand words

    Comment

    • irtek
      Trusted Tech

      100+ Posts
      • Jun 2009
      • 110

      #3
      Re: Canon IR1740if information

      Thanks for the information.

      Comment

      • Simons
        Trusted Tech
        • Jun 2008
        • 490

        #4
        Re: Canon IR1740if information

        Id like to know more about how these are doing also. These replaced the ir1025

        Comment

        • RSFarrer
          Technician
          • Sep 2008
          • 20

          #5
          Re: Canon IR1740if information

          can't speak to the envelopes. But we sell a lot of these now for several accounts that are now just looking to have several A4/letter MFPs closer to the people. I am amazed how fast they are.
          They aren't much different from the iR25xx series, but are simple to network. But certainly not as robust in options as the Advanced Series.

          Comment

          • mjarbar

            #6
            Re: Canon IR1740if information

            canon-ir1700-series.pdf

            They are basicaly a small work group machine in a desktop chasis, well optioned we have sold a few and so far not had any problems. i have attached a data sheet if it helps.

            As always with envelopes or any type of media make sure they are a good quality and within spec of the machine to handle.

            Comment

            Working...