Good morning everyone,
I have a customer who had a Ricoh MPC3501 that could no longer scan to their server. Rather than upgrade their equipment, they bought a tabletop Fujistu scanner. It worked for them until I started fighting IH coil error codes on the Ricoh so they decided to replace the machine. I installed a Konica Minolta C368 and now they can scan to their server once again. However, their Fujitsu uses OCR to automatically rotate pages that are scanned upside down and thats a feature they now can't live without because they no longer need to go through and rotate stacks by hand before scanning them. My question is, does the LK 105 enable that feature in the machine? Or do I need the LK 110 for that? We are a Muratec dealer so I do have access to the OCR firmware and the machine does have the expanded memory, but our cost is over $400 for that option so I'm looking to see if I can get this token license cheaper for my customer.
I appreciate all you guys do on this site, it's been a tremendious resource over the years.
I have a customer who had a Ricoh MPC3501 that could no longer scan to their server. Rather than upgrade their equipment, they bought a tabletop Fujistu scanner. It worked for them until I started fighting IH coil error codes on the Ricoh so they decided to replace the machine. I installed a Konica Minolta C368 and now they can scan to their server once again. However, their Fujitsu uses OCR to automatically rotate pages that are scanned upside down and thats a feature they now can't live without because they no longer need to go through and rotate stacks by hand before scanning them. My question is, does the LK 105 enable that feature in the machine? Or do I need the LK 110 for that? We are a Muratec dealer so I do have access to the OCR firmware and the machine does have the expanded memory, but our cost is over $400 for that option so I'm looking to see if I can get this token license cheaper for my customer.
I appreciate all you guys do on this site, it's been a tremendious resource over the years.
Comment