from Japan About SP-5-816-001 of SP mode MPC2802

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • osamu takahashi
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2013
    • 7

    #1

    from Japan About SP-5-816-001 of SP mode MPC2802

    機械翻訳です  

    こんにちはみんなしかし、それは初期値をonにすることではなく、電源offを返します0に設定した初期値 2からsp-5-816-001についてです。または他の設定が関連していますか?
    Last edited by osamu takahashi; 07-20-2016, 09:17 AM.
  • slimslob
    Retired

    Site Contributor
    25,000+ Posts
    • May 2013
    • 36153

    #2
    Re: from Japan About SP-5-816-001 of SP mode MPC2802

    It is a machine translation

    Hi guys, however, it is not to the initial value to on, but from the initial value 2 is set to 0, which returns the power off for sp-5-816-001. Or other settings are relevant?

    SP 5816-001 is set according to the Remote Service product is being used. Set at 2 allows the RCGate to find the device when embedded @Remote cannot be used due to the number of devices or presence of devices without embedded @Remote capability.

    SP5816-001が使用されているリモートサービス、製品に応じて設定されています。 @Remoteが原因でデバイスまたは組み込み@Remoteの機能を持たないデバイスの存在の数に使用す ることはできません埋め込まれたときに、デバイスを見つけるためRCGateは2で可能に設定 します。

    Comment

    • osamu takahashi
      Junior Member
      • Jul 2013
      • 7

      #3
      Re: from Japan About SP-5-816-001 of SP mode MPC2802

      Translation was Japanese!
      I didn't notice until it was pointed out.
      I'm sorry!

      Mr. slimslob Thank you very much for your answer. When @REMOTE is set, is it OK for SP 5-5816-001 in the state of 2 of defaults? @ RIMOTE was cleared, so does remote service break?
      Last edited by osamu takahashi; 07-21-2016, 11:57 AM.

      Comment

      • osamu takahashi
        Junior Member
        • Jul 2013
        • 7

        #4
        Re: from Japan About SP-5-816-001 of SP mode MPC2802

        Translation was Japanese!
        I didn't notice until it was pointed out.
        I'm sorry!

        Remote service of SP-5-816-001 is set as 0 from 2 of defaults, a power supply, off and On, when, I return to 2 of defaults again. Is it somewhat well-founded?

        Comment

        Working...