MFC-5720DW Phantom Jamb at power on

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • NeoMatrix
    Senior Tech.

    2,500+ Posts
    • Nov 2010
    • 3514

    #1

    MFC-5720DW Phantom Jamb at power on

    Brother MFC-5720DW has random phantom jamb from power on or every 2nd or 3rd sheet out of the tray.

    The machine has low copy count with only 2700 copies.
    Displays reads "1: Jamb at front".

    Check paper path(s) for possible paper scraps, all seems ok.
    Have execute user Maintenance "remove paper scrap mode."

    Checked encoder strip for damage, all appears ok.

    Suggestions welcome before I pull the machine down.

    Tnx Neo
    Inauguration to the "AI cancel-culture" fraternity 1997...
    •••••• •••[§]• |N | € | o | M | Δ | t | π | ¡ | x | •[§]••• ••••••
  • Elmtech
    Trusted Tech

    100+ Posts
    • Nov 2013
    • 155

    #2
    Re: MFC-5720DW Phantom Jamb at power on

    Possible comtamination on the encoder carriage movement or paper feed. Also possibly paper width sensor on the carriage PCB.

    Comment

    • NeoMatrix
      Senior Tech.

      2,500+ Posts
      • Nov 2010
      • 3514

      #3
      Re: MFC-5720DW Phantom Jamb at power on

      Originally posted by Elmtech
      Possible comtamination on the encoder carriage movement or paper feed. Also possibly paper width sensor on the carriage PCB.
      This model is a pain to get simple access to any sensors.
      Where is the paper width sensor you're referring too ?
      Is that sensor up under the print head carriage ?

      I'll have strip all the covers off this machine,oh joy...
      Inauguration to the "AI cancel-culture" fraternity 1997...
      •••••• •••[§]• |N | € | o | M | Δ | t | π | ¡ | x | •[§]••• ••••••

      Comment

      • Elmtech
        Trusted Tech

        100+ Posts
        • Nov 2013
        • 155

        #4
        Re: MFC-5720DW Phantom Jamb at power on

        Yeah thats the one underneath the carriage pcb. They can be a pain in the ass and tbh i have never had that sensor fail on that model.

        Comment

        Working...